Take a look at the quality package under contrib/benchmark.
Regards,
Doron
On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Panos Konstantinidis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello I am a new lucene user. I am trying to calculate the
recall/precision of
a query and I was wondering if lucene provides an easy way
Should be the parenthesis which are part of the query syntax
Try escaping - \( \)
Also see
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_0/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters
Doron
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 9:03 AM, saikrishna venkata pendyala
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am facing
Dear All,
I'm relatively new to Java and especially new to Lucene. I study Computational
Linguistics and this term we are required to make projects using Lucene.
My choice was to write a user-friendly application, which could allow user to
crate collections of text files and then search through
Thank you.
So I will call flush in 2.3 (and may lose data when machine dies) and
commit() in 2.4+ (here a sync() will save the data).
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 8. Februar 2008 21:01
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Exactly!
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you.
So I will call flush in 2.3 (and may lose data when machine dies) and
commit() in 2.4+ (here a sync() will save the data).
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 8. Februar 2008 21:01
QueryParser uses special syntax, which can get in the way, for
operators and grouping, etc. Parenthesis are part of that special
syntax, and need to be backslash escaped for QueryParser to skip
treating them as grouping operators, for example: Ajit_\(Agarkar\)
Erik
On Feb 10,
PhraseQuery.extractTerms() returns the terms making up the phrase,
and so it is not adequate for 'finding' a single term that represents
the phrase query, one that represents the searched entire text.
It seems you are trying to obtain a string that can be matched against
the displayed text for
So nobody's run into anything like this before? The need to share the
index between many copies of the app possibly running on multiple servers?
Russ
Ruslan Sivak wrote:
The app does other things then search the index. I'm basically using
ColdFusion for the website and have four instances
9 feb 2008 kl. 00.53 skrev Matt Ronge:
On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
6 feb 2008 kl. 23.10 skrev Matt Ronge:
I may index the token house maybe found in different places with
different types. If the user query contains house, I want to
report the number of instances of
On Feb 9, 2008 12:07 AM, Ruslan Sivak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The app does other things then search the index. I'm basically using
ColdFusion for the website and have four instances running on two
servers for load balancing. Each app does the searches, and the search
times are small, the
Is it a single index ? My index is also in the 200G range, but I never
managed to get
a single index of size 20G and still get acceptable performance (in
both searching and updating).
So I split my indexes into chunks of 10G
I am curious as to how you manage such a single large index.
Cedric
So, I have a question about 'splitting indexes'. I see people say
this all over, but how have people been handling this. I'm going to
start a new thread, and there probably was one back in the day, but I
am going to fire it up again. But, how did you do it?
On Feb 10, 2008 9:18 PM, Cedric Ho
Hi,
Thanks a lot Cohen and Erik. Yes \) works, I tried it even before. But I
was wondering why the Whitespace analyzer is breaking the string at (.
Now it's clear, thnks once again.
--Saikrishna.
On Feb 10, 2008 9:17 PM, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QueryParser uses special syntax,
I guess it would be quite different for different apps.
For me, I do index update on a single machine: index each incoming
documents into one chunk according to some rule to ensure even
distribution. Then copy all the updated indexes to some other machines
for searching. Each machine will then
14 matches
Mail list logo
