Hi
We've run into problems w/ LockFactory usage on our system. The problem is
that the system can be such that the index is configured on a local file
system, or a remote, shared one. If remote/share, the protocol is sometimes
SMB 1.0/2.0, Samba, NFS 3/4 etc. In short, we have no control on the FS
Hi Shai,
> have other uses as well? What about multiple IndexWriters from the same
> JVM?
This also needs a lock. But if it is guaranteed to only have one JVM
accessing the index, you can use an in-JVM-Locking mechanism which is
provided by
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_0/api/all/org/apache/l
I have multiple JVMs on different machines accessing the shared file system.
I don't really have multiple IndexWriters on the same JVM, I asked this just
out of curiosity.
So I don't understand from your reply if it's safe to use NoLockFactory, or
I should use SimpleFSLockFactory and unlock if nee
Hi, just upgraded my code to Lucene 3.0 and on one simple search I get
the following stacktrace when I pass Integer.MAX_VALUE to the
Searcher.search(Query query,int n) method, if I change the value to 1000
it works okay.
java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
at
org.apache.lucene.util.Prior
Currently the sole usage of the LockFactory within Lucene is for the
write.lock, ie, to prevent more than one writer (= IndexWriter, or,
IndexReader trying to do deletions or set norms) from being open on
the index at once.
If your app has external mechanisms that can ensure, without fail,
that on
Thanks Mike.
I'm pretty sure about our mechanism to control one JVM opening the index for
write, but bugs can always be discovered. That's why we used
NativeFSLockFactory - because even if the JVM is killed, the lock file
should be removed. So if we do find the lock, it's fishy (Siamese or not).
B
Hello all,
I'm actually looking for a software who can search in a computer (and on
windows network drive) all files and the contents of files based on indexing
method.
I have few questions about lucene :
- Lucene engine does index only the contents ? or is it possible to index
the name of fold
If you want to have all results, you do something wrong. :-)
Full text engines like lucene are made for returning only top-ranking
results. So if you use TopDocs results you must know before how many TopDocs
you want to have. Internally Lucene works with PriorityQueues that filter
the top ranking
Yes, Lucene is an API. You'd have to write a significant amount
of code to accomplish what you want. The Lucene demo would
be a good place to start.
Lucene by itself doesn't index anything. You have to design a
schema, feed it data and search that data. You can make it
index file names, dates, siz
This forum is probably not the best place to ask this question, since this
is Lucene developers/users forum. If you want to write a tool, then this is
the place is to be. If you want an ready tool, one I am aware of is
searchmyfiles.exe from Nirsoft.
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/search_my_files.ht
Uwe Schindler wrote:
If you want to have all results, you do something wrong. :-)
Full text engines like lucene are made for returning only top-ranking
results. So if you use TopDocs results you must know before how many TopDocs
you want to have. Internally Lucene works with PriorityQueues that
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 15:50:45 archibal wrote:
>
> -optionnally i want to have a central server which index all data
> (name of files, folders and file content) on network and i would like
> to connect via a browser on the central server ? are there project
> who does this or something like
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 16:20:28 Stefan Trcek wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 December 2009 15:50:45 archibal wrote:
> > -optionnally i want to have a central server which index all data
> > (name of files, folders and file content) on network and i would
> > like to connect via a browser on the cen
Hi,
I'm using SpellChecker (in Lucene contrib) to help users of SVNSearch
who can't type right:
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?logMessage=lusene
SpellChecker works very well for my purpose, but I've encountered a
possible file resource leak issue:
I can't find any way to close
WEBINAR:
Hosted by KMWorld and featuring speakers from The Motley Fool and
Lucid Imagination
Tuesday, Dec 8: 2pm ET/11amPT/1900 GMT
Sign up here: http://www.kmworld.com/webinars/lucid/08dec2009/luc3
Greetings,
I'll be presenting along with some of our customers from Motley Fool
at a free we
Hi,
In my application certain kind of queries for certain kinds of inputs will
be repeated on the lucene index. The application flow is something like
this:
1. Get input A
2. Lookup a key/value store for key A
3. Load a text from key value store to be used as a query
4. Analyze the te
Hi,
As per title...is it possible to store image using Lucene? And if its
possible...how can I do that?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Storing-image-with-Lucene-tp26620107p26620107.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Hi,
Lucene supports string/int literals for indexing and searching. In other
words, anything that can be transformed into a string/int can be consumed by
the lucene api. Moreover, so are you trying to implement an image search? In
that case perhaps you'd have to either figure out a transform else t
Hi,
Yes you can, create a binary field which you can use to store the image
in.
Field(String name, Reader reader) Use this to store your image and use
binaryValue() to get the image back.
You can also look at storing the features of the image into the index in
similar way.
--Thanks and Regards
Thanks for the reply...yes i am trying to create an Image Search. And I did
create something similar to your
suggestion on only storing the links. But due to some limitations being set
on me...I have to find a way to
store the image..
Maybe I could try the transform idea.
Anshum-2 wrote:
>
>
Hi Vaijanath,
Just wanted to know if you can perform a search on the binary field (as I
haven't tried this ever) ?
--Original Message--
From: Rao, Vaijanath
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
ReplyTo: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Storing image with Lucene
Sent: Dec 3, 2009 08:27
oh...thanks for the suggestion. I will try using the idea.If it works I will
let u all know..
Anshum-2 wrote:
>
> Hi Vaijanath,
> Just wanted to know if you can perform a search on the binary field (as I
> haven't tried this ever) ?
> --Original Message--
> From: Rao, Vaijanath
> To: ja
I found a solution already.
That is to convert the image from byte array of the image >> string
Then the string will be stored in the index. But beware, the byte will have
to be encoded to Base64
or the image retrieved will be mess up(meaning the pic is totally ruin)
blazingwolf7 wrote:
>
> o
What kind of queries are these? I.e. How much work goes into step 4? Is
this
a fairly standard combination of Boolean/Phrase/other stock Lucene queries
built
up out of tokenizing the text?
If so, it's going to be nowhere near the bottleneck in your runtime (we're
talking
often way less than a mi
24 matches
Mail list logo