Documents cannot be re-used in v3.0?
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed
-glen
http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/
On 2 February 2010 02:55, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ganesh,
do you reuse your Document instances in any way or do you create new
docs
They can.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Glen Newton [mailto:glen.new...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:03 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exception while
They can be reused, but the exception and looking into the code shows that you
are doing it wrong. You can reuse Documents but only under two conditions:
a) In one thread, not one document in multithreaded app - one document per
thread! And using one document in more than one thread is what you
Yes. I am using the objects across threads. Thanks for pointing out.
But still i didn't see much increase in performance by reusing documents and
field objects.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday,
But still i didn't see much increase in performance by reusing documents and
field objects.
Oh well, some you win, some you lose. Although it sounds like you're
still winning. Are you following all the other advice on
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed. Maybe the
best
Ian Lea wrote:
Sounds like a job for near realtime search aka NRT.
Take a look at IndexWriter.getReader().
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/NearRealtimeSearch
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/04/10/real-time-search-with-lucene/
And more with the help of your favourite search
Hi Nariman,
In my understanding of ComplexPhraseQueryParser this class is not longer
supported.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486#action_12782254
Instead with lucene 3.1 the new
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.standard.parser.StandardSyntaxParser will do
this job.
I'm not sure that I understand the question. Can you not use a
searcher based on the reader returned by IndexWriter.getReader() to
determine if the doc is already in the index?
Or just use IndexWriter.updateDocument to save or replace as appropriate.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:21 PM,
Second concern: boosting a
phrase (java developer^10.0) doesn't seem to be applied
when you look at the result explanations when using the
ComplexPhraseQueryParser - it's respected on single word
queries and it's respected on phrases using the basic
QueryParser.
I just tested and able to
I'm not able to see the boost applied even with an additional term added.
The original query:
+(JOB_TITLE:java developer^15.0 TEXT:java developer) +LANGUAGE:EN
+GATEWAY:work
Modified to:
+(JOB_TITLE:java developer^15.0 JOB_TITLE:java TEXT:java developer)
+LANGUAGE:EN +GATEWAY:work
Dear Lan Lea,
Thanks much for your reply.
Please tell me more details of coord.
what is its default?
how to customize it, why we have to define.
Thank you much for understading my question.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Ian Lea ian@gmail.com wrote:
I presume that quote is from the
with my idea,
using BooleanQuery, you can make every thing.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Asif Nawaz asifna...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, I am new to use lucene, I have a query string of multiple terms. i) i
want to return query string by removing stop words and stemmed version of
the query.
Hi, I have the following test case point to the index generated in our
application. The result is confusing me and I don't know the reason.
Lucene version: 2.9.0
JDK 1.6.0_18
public class IndexTest1 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
FSDirectory directory
I am using org.apache.lucene.analysis.snowball.SnowballAnalyzer.
Looking through luke, I see that www.fubar.com was indexed, not fubar. So,
clearly, I'm not stripping out the stop words of www and com. Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
Is there an analyzer like keyword analyzer, but will also lowering the data
from lucene? Or I have to do a customer analyzer by myself?
Thanks
From: java8...@hotmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: During the wild card search, will lucene 2.9.0 to convert the
search
Seeing www.fubar.com in the index means that your analyzer returns it as a
single token. To strip out www and com, you have to use an analyzer that
returns tokens as www, fubar and com.
Try to use a different analyzer( or write your own as below ).
//a C# example
public class
I am working on building a web search engine and I would like to build a reults
page similar to what Google does. The functionality I am looking to include is
what I refer to a rolling up sites, meaning that even if a particular site
(defined by its base URL) has many relevent hits on various
Hi Mike,
Not really through queries, but you may do this by writing a custom
collector. You'd need some supporting data structure to mark/hash the
occurrence of a domain in your result set.
--
Anshum Gupta
Naukri Labs!
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the
18 matches
Mail list logo
