Hi all,
I made a mistake, finished indexing all my database (millions of
documents..), regarding field dates as usual fields.
Instead of doing:
doc.add(Field.Keyword(indexDate, new Date());
I added it as:
doc.add(new Field(indexDate, String.valueOf(new Date().toString()),
Field.Store.YES,
Thank you all for your support.
I'm using now RegEx query from Lucene Contrib package which handles it fine
in my unit test. I'm waiting for confirmation from the other developer team
if this fixed their issue.
--
View this message in context:
How are you searching? If looking for exact dates I guess you could
make it work by passing in the exact value but ranges would be
challenging.
My advice would be to upgrade to a current version of Lucene and
reindex everything with the date as a NumericField.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at
You're welcome!
One small clarification: it's the section (10.2 -- CLucene) not the
whole chapter 10 that's free for downloading...
Mike
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote:
Hi,
Just to let everyone know Manning have released an extra chapter from
Hi All,
I am finally having some time to upgrade our lucene from the 2.4 series
to the 2.9 series. And I am having a problem that while everything
compiles great I am getting a new UnsupportedOperationException.
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
at
I was afraid this would be the answer..
Thanks a lot!
Liat
On 29 June 2010 12:03, Ian Lea ian@gmail.com wrote:
How are you searching? If looking for exact dates I guess you could
make it work by passing in the exact value but ranges would be
challenging.
My advice would be to upgrade
Hey,
I need to add a new field (a stored , not indexed field) for all documents
present in an existing large index. Reindexing the whole index will be very
costly. Is there a way to do this or any work around?
I would also like to know, if data or term vector, of a field indexed
without storing,
Unfortunately, I don't think it is possible to add new field without
re-indexing.
As for extracting content from the field, it should be possible to
retrieve data if the term vectors
were stored with positions offset
(Field.TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS). If not, I don't
think it's possible.
Hi all,
I'm looking for a functionality similar to IndexWriter.updateDocument()
*IndexWriter.**updateDocumenthttp://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/api/core/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.html#updateDocument%28org.apache.lucene.index.Term,%20org.apache.lucene.document.Document%29
Can someone point me to a code example that demonstrates processing terms from
a query result? I want to extract payloads from the terms that are selected by
the query. I'm having difficulty getting to an object in the query result that
implements getPayload().
Thank you for the assistance,
Can someone point me to a code example that demonstrates processing tokens from
a query result? I want to iterate over TermPositions but can't find my way to
an object that instantiates that interface.
Thank you for the assistance,
Peter
I am out of the office until 01/07/2010.
Note: This is an automated response to your message example of processing
terms in query results? sent on 29/6/10 18:09:45.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Hi Erick,
Any comments about this requirement?
2010/6/29 a peng zhoudengp...@gmail.com
Hi Erick,
Thanks for you reply, now I get the point why I can not get the search
result. But can you guide me how can I use Lucene to implement the following
search feature:
Basically we can call this
No, I really don't have a good solution off the top of my head, perhaps
others can chime in...
Although I suppose you could fire multiple queries dropping out
some number of search terms, but I don't know whether that
satisfies your requirements. E.g. search the following phrases
this is a formal
while calling addindexes or addindexes with no optimize can any gurantee be
given about the document order in the new documents given that the order of
directories/indexreader is fixed.
So is it that ith document coming from jth indexreader will always have some
x(i,j) position in the final
Similar kind of code is given in Lucene in Action 2nd edition book , you
can dwld the code from the manning website.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Peter Wilkins pwilk...@mit.edu wrote:
Can someone point me to a code example that demonstrates processing tokens
from a query result? I want
16 matches
Mail list logo