Hello ,
Can we use subset of documents , for searching .
Lets say I
have hash map of
P1 -1,2,3,4
P2 - 3,4,5
P3-7,5,3
Now I have an
documents in lucene index stored as
1-P1
2-P1
3-P1,P2,P3
4-P1,P2
5-P2,P3
7-P3
..
..
when i search docs with P2 I get 3,4,5
Now I
On 2010-06-30 05:12, Apoorv Sharma wrote:
while calling addindexes or addindexes with no optimize can any gurantee be
given about the document order in the new documents given that the order of
directories/indexreader is fixed.
So is it that ith document coming from jth indexreader will
yes, with lucene's current API's, it does not seem possible.
But, as this is a problem that many might be facing, I was hoping someone
might have figured out a solution.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Mango bgh...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't think it is possible to add new field
On 2010-06-29 13:40, Naveen Kumar wrote:
Hey,
I need to add a new field (a stored , not indexed field) for all
documents present in an existing large index. Reindexing the whole
index will be very costly. Is there a way to do this or any work
around?
There are some other low-level ways to
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/
and
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/04/18/refresh-getting-started-with-payloads/
On Jun 29, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Peter Wilkins wrote:
Can someone point me to a code example that demonstrates processing
This implies there is no way to merge two parallel indexes(based on parallel
reader) to get a new parallel index. Correct me if I am wrong.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Andrzej Bialecki a...@getopt.org wrote:
On 2010-06-30 05:12, Apoorv Sharma wrote:
while calling addindexes or
Hi,
I use an AnalyzingQueryParser with the StandardAnalyzer and german
stopwords in Lucene 3.0.1. If I have a query with a stopword followd by
a wildcard (e. g. das*) I get a ParseException: Cannot build PrefixQuery
with analyzer class org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer
-
On 2010-06-30 22:16, Apoorv Sharma wrote:
This implies there is no way to merge two parallel indexes(based on parallel
reader) to get a new parallel index. Correct me if I am wrong.
Do you mean sequentially, using IW.addIndexes(new
IndexReader[]{index1,index2}), so that the fields from