Any thoughts on this?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:23 PM
Subject: [Bulk] Multiple sort field
Hello all,
I have more than one record having same time stamp. When i sort by date time in
decending order, the set of records which
Hi Folks,
I need your help in determining whether we upgrade to 3.6 or wait till 4.0
becomes stable.
We are currently using 2.x version of lucene and would like to upgrade to
3.6(and 4.0 ultimately). But we were informed by few blogs that 4.0 will
not be backward compatible which means that the o
It's lucene
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Heyde [mailto:ralf.he...@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 10:42 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: AW: Lucene reorganizing indexes
Do you use Lucene or Solr?
We faced the problem in Solr due too big Caches, which where (re)warmed up
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce the release of Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox for
Lucene 4.0.0-ALPHA. Standalone binary and sources are available as usual
from:
http://code.google.com/p/luke
Changes in v. 4.0-ALPHA (released on 2012.07.17):
---
Hi,
Tests show that TermEnum.docFreq() returns sum of all docs, including
the deleted ones. Which seems to (indirectly) contradict the javadoc
This frequency count is used to compute uninverted index
(DocTermOrds.uninvert()). The code goes like:
final int df = te.docFreq();
if (df <=
Hello all!
I solved my problem by short-circuting the filter part of the query and
adding my checks during the getFilteredScorer method of my extended
org.apache.lucene.search.FilteredQuery class. In here, the documents
referenced are part of the results set and I can add my post search
filtering
Dear Carsten,
your question was about the purpose of the offset-Attribute and the
reader.getTermFreqVector method.
You have asked because this method is not very fast.
imho main reason for TermFreqVectors is highlighting.
(FastVectorHighlighter and DefaultSolrHighlighter#doHighlightingByHighligh
Am 16.07.2012 13:07, schrieb karsten-s...@gmx.de:
Dear Karsten,
> abstract of your post:
> you need the offset to perform your search/ranking like the position is
> needed for phrase queries.
> You are using reader.getTermFreqVector to get the offset.
> This is to slow for your application and
Hello all,
I have more than one record having same time stamp. When i sort by date time in
decending order, the set of records which have same time stamp are displayed in
the order of insertion. Basically it is displayed with asscending order of
docid. But i want the reverse of that.
Consider
