Re: Querying with Term Frequency Vectors

Store the term value as payload, and score with it. On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Sharon Tam wrote: > Hi, > > I have generated my own term-frequency vector representations of documents > and would like to be able to query these with term-frequency vector queries > instead of a text-string que

Bulk indexing and delete old index files

Hi. I want indexing all documents once a day and after indexing delete old index files that indexed before a day. I think to do this, indexing all documents in new directory and replace IndexSearcher and IndexWriter with olds, and delete old index directory. Is there more good indexing strategy?

Re: Lucene 4.1: IntField cannot be found by a NumericRangeFilter/NumericRangeQuery

Phew, thanks for bringing closure! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Konstantyn Smirnov wrote: > Ah yes, my bad! > > I indeed used my own fieldTypes for my numeric fields. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c

Re: Lucene 4.1: IntField cannot be found by a NumericRangeFilter/NumericRangeQuery

Ah yes, my bad! I indeed used my own fieldTypes for my numeric fields. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-4-1-IntField-cannot-be-found-by-a-NumericRangeFilter-NumericRangeQuery-tp4044544p4044670.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archiv

Re: 答复: About the Sorting of Groups during Grouping by

Hello Oliver, We are very interested in group sorting based on some aggregation function also. Would you consider contributing your code to Lucene, or posting your results? Tom Tom Burton-West Information Retrieval Programmer Digital Library Production Service University of Michigan Library http

Querying with Term Frequency Vectors

Hi, I have generated my own term-frequency vector representations of documents and would like to be able to query these with term-frequency vector queries instead of a text-string query. Is there anyway to bypass the Lucene preprocessing that occurs in the indexing of documents and queryparsing t

Re: Split index and store

100 terms in a boolean query is not so costly. You could wrap that query in a ConstantScoreQuery to avoid the score calculation. Why do you have separate indexes? It would be better to build a single document and index+store it on a single index. Thanks Emmanuel 2013/3/1 Ramprakash Ramamoorthy

Re: Lucene 4.1: IntField cannot be found by a NumericRangeFilter/NumericRangeQuery

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Konstantyn Smirnov wrote: > changing FT to indexed=true did the trick, thanks > > Shouldn't it be enabled by default? It should be, and I think it is, so now I'm confused/worried why you see it not enabled for indexing by default. This is how IntField inits its T

RE: Lucene 4.1: IntField cannot be found by a NumericRangeFilter/NumericRangeQuery

changing FT to indexed=true did the trick, thanks Shouldn't it be enabled by default? If I invert a field using one of numeric classes, I'd expect it to be indexed. Otherwise I would use a StringField or StoredField... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene

RE: Lucene 4.1: IntField cannot be found by a NumericRangeFilter/NumericRangeQuery

The field is not indexed (see the debug output, it says indexed = false). - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Konstantyn Smirnov [mailto:inject...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 5:

Lucene 4.1: IntField cannot be found by a NumericRangeFilter/NumericRangeQuery

Hi guys, On my path of migrating from 3.6.x to 4.1, I'm facing the following problem: I create a document with an IntField in it: doc.add new IntField( 'freeSeats', 5, Store.YES ) After adding to the doc and writing to the index, the field looks like (copied from eclipse debugger): [20]Int