This is wierd. I indexed using DiskDocValuesFormat as the default codec and
observed 16K qps with BinaryDocValuesField. But with a simple StoredField,
I observed a much higher 30K qps. When I added both fields
(BinaryDocValuesField and StoredField) to the index, I observed only 100
qps on each
I'm looking for a consultant for Lucene Solr.
Our team of 3 extended OpenBravo (Java ERP) with a built-in Shopping Cart
(written in JS).
I'm now on the search/faceted-search part of the shopping cart, and would
love to have someone lead our team in implementing Lucene Solr.
Thanks for your
Hi Nick,
do you have exact spezification of what you wan't to get done
by solr ?
do you need assistance and consultation in your office or would
you be fine with remote work / assistance ?
Greetings,
Marc
Am 28.03.2013 19:32, schrieb Nick Hoffman:
I'm looking for a consultant for Lucene
I believe that when Lucene indexes documents, it generates counts for a
term by counting how many times the term appears in a particular document.
Instead of having Lucene do the counting, I want to do my own counting and
feed a term-frequency vector representation of a document directly into the
Hi,
Some of the stuff I've read suggests that Lucene is not especially well-suited
to storing the documents. It's supposed to be great at indexing those
documents, but not so great at storing the docs themselves.
Can someone shed some light on this?
If this is true, then am I right to think
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Paul arach...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Some of the stuff I've read suggests that Lucene is not especially
well-suited to storing the documents. It's supposed to be great at
indexing those documents, but not so great at storing the docs themselves.
If you
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Sharon Tam sharon...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that when Lucene indexes documents, it generates counts for a
term by counting how many times the term appears in a particular document.
Instead of having Lucene do the counting, I want to do my own counting
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Paul arach...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Paul,
Some of the stuff I've read suggests that Lucene is not especially
well-suited to storing the documents. It's supposed to be great at indexing
those documents, but not so great at storing the docs themselves.