On 24-7-2013 21:58 Sriram Sankar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
Scoring has been a major focus of Lucene. Non-scored filters are also
available, but the query parsers are focused (exclusively) on scored-search.
When you say filter do you
It looks like something is wrong with your IO system? Is this a local
drive or a remote mount?
IndexWriter tried to create a new file and hit that odd Input/output error...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:53 PM, ash nix nixd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you describe what your test is doing? How do you purge the
index? It's best to open IndexWriter with OpenMode.CREATE to purge
(rather than remove the files yourself).
Lock obtain timed out means another IndexWriter is currently using
that directory.
Mike McCandless
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your help.
This is remote mount.
Do you know possible reasons of why it can crash on remote mounts.
Thank,
Ashwin
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
It looks like something is wrong with your IO system? Is this a local
Something must have gone wrong on the remote mount's end, or in the
network communications b/w the client and the server? It could really
be anything...
In general it's riskier and often far lower performance to host the
index on a remote mount.
It's better to replicate the index locally; the
My test case first create an empty disk index folder then feed some doc
then do some query.
I purge the index by delete all files in the folder.
My unit test has several test cases they use same directory in the disk.
But it runs one by oneļ¼and I dont think there will be 2 threads use the
Are you sure each test always closes the IndexWriter?
Still, it's best to have each test uses its own directory to avoid any
risk of confusing failures ...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Yonghui Zhao zhaoyong...@gmail.com wrote:
My test case
Thanks everyone. I'm trying this out:
So searching would become:
- Create a Query with only your termA
- Create a TermsFilter with all your termB's
- execute your preferred search-method with both the query and the filter
I don't the get the same results as before - and am still debugging.
Hi,
I just did the setup for solr in Tomcat, set the schema pointing to a big
database, create 50 cores (one for each US state), the indexes are
generated.
Where can I find an example servlet and a jsp with a form to search those
indexes ?
thanks, your help is appreciated.
--
View this
Hi Sriram,
I don't see any obvious mistakes, although you don't need to create a
FilteredQuery: There are plenty of search-methods on the IndexSearcher
that accept both a query (your TermQuery) and a filter (your TermsFilter).
The way I understand Filters (but I have no advanced in-depth
Shai and Michael,
Thanks for your help. That did the trick, getting the live
IndexDeletionPolicy from the live writer config.
I also agree with Michael, it's not obvious at all from the docs and/or
Lucene in Action book. Maybe this can be clarified on the
IndexDeletionPolicy javadocs going
Well, it's sort of documented on IndexWriterConfig already:
* Once {@link IndexWriter} has been created with this object, changes to
this
* object will not affect the {@link IndexWriter} instance. For that, use
* {@link LiveIndexWriterConfig} that is returned from {@link
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Marcos Juarez Lopez mjua...@gmail.com wrote:
Shai and Michael,
Thanks for your help. That did the trick, getting the live
IndexDeletionPolicy from the live writer config.
I also agree with Michael, it's not obvious at all from the docs and/or
Lucene in
In addition, although I am a bit beyond my expertise here, I believe you
should be able to take any query object, including one returned from a query
parser, wrap it with a ConstantScoreQuery, and then search on the CSQ to
avoid all the scoring overhead.
For example, *:* is super fast even
14 matches
Mail list logo
