Hi all,
I have an index task which will index thousands of records with lucene 3.0.1.
My confusion is lucene will always create a .cfx and a .cfs file in the file
system, sometimes more, while I thought it should create a single .cfs file if
I optimize the index data. Is it by design? If yes, i
t with the extension .cfx.
In addition to
Compound File .cfs An optional "virtual" file consisting of all the other
index files for systems that frequently run out of file handles.
Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: 张志田 [mailto:zhitian.zh...@dianping.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoc
ns a merge from the findMergesForOptimize for this case (the
default MergePolicy returns null since it thinks this case is already
optimized).
Or... if you index with two separate IndexWriter sessions, and then
call optimize, that should also merge down to one file.
Mike
2010/5/5 张志田 :
> Uwe, t
Dear Luceners,
I'm using lucene-3.0.2 in our app. There is some testing code for switching
index, however, when my code run a couple of times, I found the index file
was locked, I can not delete the old index files.
The code looks like:
public class SearchTest
{
private static final int MA
'Q') you don't close the
> current searcher. Could that be it?
>
> Also you are calling FSDir.open each time but should only do it once
> (though this should be "harmless").
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 AM, 张志田 wrote:
> > Dear Luc
gt; exception?
>
> Also, can you whittle down your example even more? EG if calling
> this method twice causes the problem, make a method that calls it
> twice and hits the exception and then start simplifying from there...
>
> Mike
>
> 2011/1/12 张志田 :
> > Mike, thanks for
ssing the directory needs to be closed before opening a new one.
>
> dir.close();
> dir = FSDirectory.open(new File(getIndexPath()));
>
> why not to open two IndexSearcher objects in an array of two instead of
> swapping them back and forth?
> it would be a lot easier.
>
> yu
es of
> only opening new searcher if need to.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
> 2011/1/13 张志田 :
> > Hi Yuhan,
> >
> > dir.close() can not solve the problem.
> >
> > The reason I have to close the old searcher is my program will replace
> the
> > old ind
IndexSearcher(dir); line with
>
> if (needToOpenNewSearcher()) {
> ...
> }
>
> where the logic in needToOpenNewSearcher() is for you to write.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> 2011/1/13 张志田 :
> > Ian, thanks for your response. Your suggestion worked for me.
&g
