Yet another NFS Question...

Hi everyone, There has been a lot of discussion regarding Lucene+NFS pitfalls. I'm not sure how to proceed with a more distributed operation. I'm trying to take the indexing load off of our search server. I can do this either by building a new server which hosts the Indexer and the Index, or a

Boolean Logic inside a QueryWrapperFilter

Hi Everyone, I have some code that dynamically creates a Boolean query designed to work as a filter. After the query runs I end up with this filter. Filter: QueryWrapperFilter(+(-SourceID:100) +spanNear([ArticleContent:nuclear, ArticleContent:proliferation], 30, false)) My expectation is that

RE: Faceting, Sort and DocIDSet

. MultiSearcher works also fine: If you have one index for each year and for each of this indices the indexorder in order of date, also the MultiSearcher will have correct INDEXORDER: Take a look to the variable int[] starts in MultiSearcher. David Seltzer wrote: Is INDEXORDER based on the DocumentID

RE: Servlets Sharing Resources

unrealistic. The stuff you want to achieve normally works by either placing objects into the HTTP session (user-bound) or attaching them to your application context (application-bound). Regards, Mindaugas On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:01 PM, David Seltzer dselt...@tveyes.com wrote: Hi All, Sorry

RE: Servlets Sharing Resources

of dealing with jndi / contexts / spring or SingleTons On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:01 PM, David Seltzer dselt...@tveyes.com wrote: Hi All, Sorry for the slightly off-topic question, but I've just run into a gap in my understanding of Servlet programming. The question: Is it possible for two

RE: Servlets Sharing Resources

at 12:56 PM, David Seltzer dselt...@tveyes.com wrote: That certainly seems like the simple way to solve the problem. I was just wondering if I was overlooking a simple way to do this via web.xml servlet-mapping. I was trying to avoid having everything hit the same doGet(). -Original Message

RE: Faceting, Sort and DocIDSet

many in average? Possible http://www.nabble.com/Taxonomy-in-Lucene-td20929487.html is also interesting for you. Best regards Karsten David Seltzer wrote: I have a set of indexes, each index contains a month's worth of Articles. I need to be able to search the index (sorting by date

RE: Faceting, Sort and DocIDSet

sort case. hope this helps, Robert On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:12 AM, David Seltzer dselt...@tveyes.com wrote: Hi Karsten, My index contains about 100M documents, and I'm trying to count results on around 300 facets. At the moment I'm keeping a set of cached facet bitsets and then comparing

Faceting, Sort and DocIDSet

) Is using BitSets the wrong way to quickly generate facet counts? I've read about DocIDSets, but I'm not sure how to use them in the same way. (I'm basing my faceting technique on Sujit Pal's article http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.ht ml) Thanks! -Dave David

RE: Retrieving TokenStream from Tokenized Non-Stored Field

have to mark the field as Field.Store.YES in order to see that field when you retrieve the doc at search time. You'll then be able to retrieve the string value. Mike On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM, David Seltzer dselt...@tveyes.com wrote: Hi All, I have a document with a field called

Using SpanNearQuery.getSpans() in a Search Result

Hi all, I'm trying to figure out how to use SpanNearQuery.getSpans(IndexReader) when working with a result set from a query. Maybe I have a fundamental misunderstanding of what an IndexReader is - I'm under the impression that it's a mechanism for sequentially accessing the documents in

Retrieving TokenStream from Tokenized Non-Stored Field

Hi All, I have a document with a field called TextTranscript. Its created using the following command: myDoc.add(new Field(TextTranscript, sTranscriptBody, Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)); I'm then trying to retrieve the TokenStream by pulling the field. Field fTextTranscript =

Sort Performance Question

Hi All, I have a sort performance question: I have a fairly large index consisting of chunks of full-text transcriptions of television, radio and other media, and I'm trying to make it searchable and sortable by date. The search front-end uses a parallelmultisearcher to search up to three

RE: Sort Performance Question

Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:03 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Sort Performance Question Are you using a cached IndexSearcher such that successive sorts on the same field will be more efficient? Erik On Mar 20, 2007, at 3:39 PM, David