lucene to sort by this field, so I want to
avoid this and instead use a less sharp priority based ordering.
Can anybody give me a hint?
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I dont know which filter to use and how. I saw a example
of a RangeFilter which seems quite simple but a range is not enough! I
dont need to check against a range but against a list of allowed ids.
Can anybody help me an give me a hint how I can accomplish this?
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto
) for each document before
writing it to the index it doesnt change anything. Even worse if I look at the
index using Luke (Version 0.7.1) each document got a boost of 1 not of the
value supplied.
Who can help me?
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
present as when this document was indexed.
I already know this, but ALL documents got a bost of 1. The values
should a least differ some how, shouldnt they?
Thanks!
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tored. Could you open an
> issue for this?
As I dont understand the bug or the problem you are pointing at I dont think I
can ope a bugreport.
Regards
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hy,
Im writing a kind of bulletin-board-software in java (servlet+velocity as
template framework, mysql5 as backend). As the whole database is in INNODB
and this doesn't support Fulltext-Indexes I looked for alternatives and liked
the concept of Lucene. But I got serveral questions:
1. Everybod
Hy,
how can I limit the result-count of a query in order to save time? I searched
the web but didn't find a solution.
Thanks
Dominik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by relevance. But the result of
the SQL-Query is sorted by the id which destroys the relevance-sorting.
Does anybody know a work-arround?
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dbruhn.de
-
To unsubscribe
Hy,
I index articles using two fields, one for the title and one for the text. Now
I want to display 5 similiar Articles for every Article during viewing. How
can I manage this? Any premade solutions?
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dbruhn.de
rst 500 Entries get added in about 2 seconds. But
for the 1167*500 to (1167+1)*500 Entries it takes more than 10 Minutes. Also
the RAM-Usage is increasing dramatically. Is this a normal behaviour, or is
it a mistake in my code or is it a bug in Lucene? I remeber someone here on
the list t
read the trick here and so I did it. I'll try without it to see if
its a difference!
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dbruhn.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
can I avoid this?
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dbruhn.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hy,
thanks for your answers.
Uppon creation of the Reader, does Lucene copy the whole Index into RAM? Or is
this cache filled while searching? How can I find out how long it takes to
create the IndexReader? Just time to Create-Call?
Thanks
--
Dominik Bruhn
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
13 matches
Mail list logo