Re: Different index per user

> This is the fairly simple case, you're not indicating that you're after > some generic Access Control List functionality so I'd stick with > the simple approach until proven inadequate... > > HTH > Erick > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Erdinc Yilmazel >

Different index per user

I am building an online application where I want to provide search functionality to users and each user is to search only within his own data. Can you give me some ideas about the structure of the index that I should have in this scenario? I know I could use a different index per user account but t

Getting score of explicit documents for a query

Hi, Given a query, is there a way to learn score of some specific documents in the index against this query? I don't want to make a global search in the index and rank and sort all the matching documents. What I want to do is learn the rank of a bunch of documents in the index that I can identify

Caching analyzed query

Hi, In my application certain kind of queries for certain kinds of inputs will be repeated on the lucene index. The application flow is something like this: 1. Get input A 2. Lookup a key/value store for key A 3. Load a text from key value store to be used as a query 4. Analyze the te

Re: Proposal for changing Lucene's backwards-compatibility policy

I'd go with B. I never do drop-in replacement of a jar even if it is a minor release for any library. I always recompile. I think the major version number shouldn't be changed unless there are lots of API changes or changes in the index format. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Mark Miller wrote

Re: [ANN] Luke 0.9.9 release

Thanks! On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm happy to announce the new release of Luke - the Lucene Index Toolbox. > > Binaries and sources are available for download at the usual place: > >http://www.getopt.org/luke/ >http://www.getopt.org/l

Re: LegthFilter

ther field not being analyzed with the an analyzer using > the length filter?! > > simon > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Erdinc Yilmazel > wrote: > > Sorry if this is a stupid question. I want my index to contain terms that > > are at least 4 characters long. So I wrote a

LegthFilter

Sorry if this is a stupid question. I want my index to contain terms that are at least 4 characters long. So I wrote a simple analyzer and applied the LengthFilter. When I open the index and get a TermEnum from the directory, I can still see terms that are less than 4 characters... What do you thi

Re: Run your Lucene Applications on Google AppEngine with GAELucene

This is great news! Are you happy with the the performance of the google data store? Do you plan to support in memory indexes using the memcache api? Thanks On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Kerang Lv wrote: > Hi Lucene users, > > Enlightened by the discussion "Can I run Lucene in google app eng

Re: Can I run Lucene in google app engine?

tch >>> that to SerialMergeScheduler which does not use threads. >>> >>> Some optional classes (FilterManager, ParallelMultiSearcher, >>> TimeLimitedCollector) spawn threads, but presumably you could avoid >>> them. >>> >>> Otherwise Lucene doesn

Re: Can I run Lucene in google app engine?

I looked at the lucene source code out of curiosity to see if it spawns threads in indexing/searching and saw that it does. Are you sure it is going to work even if the index is read only? Erdinc 2009/4/13 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् : > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Chris Lu wrote: >> Surely