Hi,
Take a look at Proximity (http://proximity.abstracthorizon.org/px1/) a
Maven Proxy that include Lucene search.
Patrick
Olivier Dehon wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone worked on a lucene maven plugin?
I am thinking of embedding a lucene index as part of a maven artifact,
so that artifact
Did you take a look at the
org.apache.lucene.analysis.ngram.NGramTokenFilter? Or other ngram
implementation? Works great for us.
Patrick
Ulrich Vachon wrote:
Hi all,
It's possible to use simplely (without java preprocessing, if possible)
Lucene to find items with this constraints
th it?
Many thanks.
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
log.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html
Best
Patrick
Ravikumar Govindarajan 于2021年5月24日周一
上午9:54写道：
> Thanks Michael!
>
> This was just what I was looking for!!. Just a couple of questions.
>
>
>- When we call addIndexes(IndexReader...),
Sorry for the delayed response, as for caching termDict data across
threads, I do not aware of any existing lucene mechanism could do that (and
it might be tricky since it is across threads), but maybe worth trying to
see whether we can get some extra speed based on that!
Patrick
Ravikumar
Hi Elbek,
Maybe go with ContainedByIntervalsSource? ContainingIntervalsSource is
actually the big source filtered by small source, and
ContainedByIntervalsSource is the opposite so it should give the expect
behavior?
Best
Patrick
elbek kamoliddinov 于2021年6月2日周三 下午2:55写道：
> Hello every
How to test if a value in a multi-value field matches a specific query?
Example of the problem:
I've created a query to return all documents of some specific authors. The
authors field contains multi-value sorted set.
When showing the result, I want to show only the name of the authors
specified
How to test if a value in a multi-value field matches a specific query?
Example of the problem:
I've created a query to return all documents of some specific authors. The
authors field contains multi-value sorted set.
When showing the result, I want to show only the name of the authors
specified
Let me clarify:
Example query: "(author:Patrick author:Michael) && type:pdf"
Example result: 2 items: Doc1 with authors "Patrick, Adalberto" and Doc2
with authors "Patrick, Michael, Elias"
I want to show the 2 items, but when I show the authors, I only wa
<https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/StandardDirectoryReader.java#L218>,
and seems all we can do right now is to reload the whole index and that
could be potentially a high cost.
Sorry for the long email and thank you in advance for any replies!
Best
Patrick
replicator/nrt module has not provided a solution
on when the primary node (main indexer) is down, how would we recover with
a back up indexer?
Thanks
Patrick
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 7:16 PM Robert Muir wrote:
> This multiple-writer isn't going to work and customizing names won't
>
at playing with
filenames can become quite
troublesome, but still, even out of my own curiosity, I want to understand
whether we're able to control
the segment names in some way?
Best
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 6:36 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> +1 trying to coordinate multiple writer
; No, you can't control them. And we must not open up anything to try to
> support this.
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 7:28 PM Patrick Zhai wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike, Robert
> >
> > Thanks for replying, the system is almost like what Mike has described:
> one wri
s://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_7_4/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/StandardDirectoryReader.java#L288>
)
So basically the applyAllDeletes you passed into SearcherManager will
affect every call to the maybeRefresh.
Best
Patrick
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:03 PM Ningshan
knows more
can chime in, but in the unit
test since you're just deleting one doc, it's quite possible that
IndexWriter will apply the delete right away
regardless of what you have passed in.
Hope that helps
Patrick
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:50 PM Ningshan Li wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
<https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DirectoryReader.java#L75>
when you're opening the IndexReader
Patrick
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:28 PM Wei wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a index that has multiple segments generated with continuous
>
For that part I'm not entirely sure, if other folks know it please chime in
:)
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 8:48 AM Wei wrote:
> Thanks Patrick! In the default case when no LeafSorter is provided, are the
> segments traversed in the order of creation time, i.e. the oldest segment
> is
; Thanks,
> Wei
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 3:33 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> > There is no meaning to the sequence. The segments are created
> concurrently
> > by many threads and the merge process will merge them without regards to
> > any ordering.
> >
&g
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.8.0.
Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library
written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any
application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting,
nearest-n
I'm using Lucene via Solr and recently upgraded from an early Summer nightly
build to the released version of Solr 1.3 (which seems to use something in
the neighborhood of Lucene 2.3). I'm posting this here because I believe
that my issue is with Lucene, not Solr.
After the upgrade, I noticed th
this would cause but there would be a fair amount of
repetitive data. (The documents tend to fall into types which are
somewhat similar as a group, thus their field orders would be similar.)
Having the field order implicitly defined by the indexing process
would be more efficient but I don't ha
't state it explicitly, I have
verified this behavior with the most recently released
version of Lucene (2.4) without Solr being involved.
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
mors my user name "pjaol" is actually an acronym of my
full name, which is only ever used
by my mother when I'm in trouble :-)
It will be a pleasure to continue working with all of you, and thank you
again for this honor.
Thanks
Patrick O'Leary
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:54 P
Porter is a little outdated I've found KStem much better
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem
You'll still need a good protected word list, but KStem is just a little
nicer
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:20 PM, David Woodward wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Any good protwords.txt out t
Committed revision 735928.
Adding myself to contrib committers list / testing karma
Thanks
Patrick
scootie:site pjaol$ svn diff docs/*.html
Index: docs/whoweare.html
===
--- docs/whoweare.html (revision 735927)
+++ docs
mkjjyy
On 8/10/07, Askar Zaidi wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am trying to do something similar. Make the content search-able as
soon as
it is added to the website. The way it can work in my scenario is
that , I
create the Index for a every new user account created.
Then, whenever a new document is
Sounds like your most difficult part will be the question parser using POS.
This is kind of old school but use something like the AliceBot AIML library
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIML
Where the subjective terms can be extracted from the questions, and indexed
separately.
Or as Grant and others
I think you need to ask the question what do you want?
A person asked me one, which is better, a gold pen fountain pen or a plastic
bic pen?
The answer - depends
If you want the most fluid writing instrument, which gives you a certain
level of accomplishment as you use it, and looks superb then th
You might want to play with both boosting and multiple sorting.
You might want to look at something like Solr's boost queries or boost
functions
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#head-6862070cf279d9a09bdab971309135c7aea22fb3
Or if you want to go down the path of a custom score, most
,3,4}))
searcher.search(q,...);
Which would allow me to avoid the Integer -> String -> Padded String ->
String -> Integer coding/decoding to index an integer, and avoid Object
-> String -> Object conversion (which per abo
version (which per above is quite expensive).
Thanks for any help!
Regards,
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
I'd start by doing some research on the question rather than asking for a
solution..
What your asking for can be considered 'Federated Search'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federated_search
And it can be conceived in as many ways as you have document types. Any
answer will probably end up
customize
Why not put the keywords into the same document as another field? and search
both fields
at once, you can then use lucene syntax to give a boosting to the keyword
fields.
e.g.
body:A good game last night by the redskins
keyword: redskins
Query= body:(game OR redskins) keyword:(game OR redskins)^10
1) The only reason for ConstantScoreQuery is because it lets me convert the
LocalLucene filter to a query.
2) TierRangeQuery- not at the moment, we're not really doing a range search,
we're pulling predefined id's (e.g. a shape) from the index using the term
enumerator.
Average time take for a bo
Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: patrick o'leary [mailto:pj...@pjaol.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:33 AM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apach
Why not have 1 servlet and based on a parameter / url, serve 2 different
outputs?
if(request.getString("asXML") !=null)
showXML();
else
showOtherStuff();
Save yourself the hassle of dealing with jndi / contexts / spring or
SingleTons
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:01 PM, David Seltzer wrote:
everything hit the same
> doGet().
>
> -Original Message-
> From: patrick o'leary [mailto:pj...@pjaol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 12:51 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Servlets Sharing Resources
>
> Why not have 1 servlet and base
There will always be levels of where data will be insecurely available. Most
notably within the memory of an application once it's running. Unless you
want to go down the path of encrypting and decrypting each and every string.
At which point you loose dictionary functionality and well any useful
e
Hi,
Don't know the size of your dataset. But, couldn't you index in 2
fields, with PerFieldAnalyzer, tokenizing with Standard for 1 field,
and WhiteSpace for the other.
Then use multiple field query (there is a query parser for that, just
don't remember the name right now).
Patr
the trick quite simply.
Patrick
On 10/1/07, John Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the size wouldn't be a problem, we could afford the extra field.
> But it would seem to complicate the search quite a lot. I'd have to run
> the search terms through both analyzers. It
d before they are added to the
new index.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/contrib/miscellaneous/src/java/org/apache/lucene/misc/IndexMergeTool.java
Thanks for your help,
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
Add a field to your document.
document.add(new Field("id", idString));
Or something like that. (Don't have the doc handy right now).
Hope this helps.
Patrick
On Feb 9, 2008 7:38 AM, Gauri Shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to get the contro
oy contrib locally without
having to create all the pom.xml files.
Another way to put my question (not being sure it is clear) is : what
should the "generate-maven-artifacts" ant task be used for? And where
can I get the latest version of the *.pom.template files?
M
Did you try the IndexSearcher.doc(int i, FieldSelector fieldSelector) method?
Could be faster because Lucene don't have do "prepare" the whole document.
Patrick
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Stephane Nicoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From the FAQ:
>
> &quo
Take a look at the ngram classes (probably in contrib, don't remember
for sure right now).
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] ASF Mirrors (linked in our release announcements or via the Lucene
website)
[] Maven repository (whether you use Maven, Ant+Ivy, Buildr, etc.)
[] I/we build them from source via an SVN/Git checkout.
[] Other (someone in your company mirrors them internally or via a
downstream project)
I need to define different similarity scores per document field.
For example for field A I want to use Lucene tf.idf score, for the numerical
field B I want to use a different metric (difference between values) and so
on...
thanks
; return sim.lengthNorm(fieldName, numTokens);
>}
> }
> // same for scorePayload. For the others, I just delegate
> // to defaultSimilarity (all I really need is scorePayload in
> // my case).
> }
>
> and in the schema.xml, I just set this class to be the similarity
Can i read the javadocs for Lucene nightly build 4.0 ?
How ?
thanks
I've downloaded Lucene nightly build because I need to customize the
similarity *per field*.
However I don't see the field parameter passed to the methods to compute the
score such as "tf" and "idf"...
how can I implement different similarities score per document field then ?
thanks
the modules as JARs):
>
> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/lastSuccessfulB
> uild/artifact/maven_artifacts/org/apache/lucene/
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> e
What's the best way to replace WhitespaceAnalyzer in this line in Lucene
nightly build 4.0 ? Is there a generic analyzer I can use ?
writer = new IndexWriter(FSDirectory.open(INDEX_DIR), new
WhitespaceAnalyzer(), true, IndexWriter.MaxFieldLength.LIMITED);
thanks
etaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Patrick Diviacco [mailto:patrick.divia...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 2:34 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: WhitespaceAnalyzer in Lucene nightly build ?
> >
>
)
thanks
On 3 March 2011 16:34, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Patrick Diviacco
> wrote:
> > I've downloaded Lucene nightly build because I need to customize the
> > similarity *per field*.
> >
> > However I don't see the
ass implementing the SimilarityProvider
and then implement the get method ?
Also, inside the get method should I check the passed string field and
return different custom similarities classes ?
thanks
Patrick
On 4 March 2011 19:57, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Patrick Di
20:39, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Patrick Diviacco
> wrote:
> > hey Robert,
> >
> > I know there is the documentation, I'm sorry I've confused setSimilarity
> > with setSimilarityProvider.
> >
> > However, my questio
Nevermind, I've finally solved.
I just now need to figure out how to retrieve the scores per fields in my
results.
I need to know how much similar each field is. I know I can use explain()
but it slows down computations...
thanks
On 4 March 2011 21:21, Patrick Diviacco wrote:
> ok tha
:07, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> Why do you want to replace the WhitespaceAnalyzer? I don't really
> understand what you are up to.
>
> simon
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Patrick Diviacco
> wrote:
> > What's the best way to replace WhitespaceAnalyzer in this li
I'm new to Lucene. If I use
description = new TermQuery(new Term("description", "my string"));
I ask Lucene to consider "my string" as unique word, right ?
I actually need to consider each word, should I use PhraseQuery instead ? Or
is it correct ?
thanks
I'm combining several scores for my queries performed with Lucene and other
software.
My issue is that I have lucene scores + other scores (not related to Lucene)
for each query result.
The other scores are all normalized between 1 and 0.
I need to normalize Lucene scores (over all queries) beca
>
>
> If description field is tokenized/analyzed during indexing you need to use
> PhraseQuery.
>
Uhm yeah I'm using a WhitespaceAnalyzer. This is the code using for
indexing:
writer = new IndexWriter(FSDirectory.open(INDEX_DIR), new
IndexWriterConfig(org.apache.lucene.util.Version.LUCENE_40, new
One more thing: It is actually not clear to me how to use PhraseQuery... I
thought I can just pass a phrase to it, but I see only add(Term) method...
should I parse the string by myself to single terms ?
On 21 March 2011 18:05, Patrick Diviacco wrote:
>
>> If description field is
I'm new to Lucene and I would like to know what's the difference (if there
is any) between
PhraseQuery.add(Term1)
PhraseQuery.add(Term2)
PhraseQuery.add(Term3)
and
term1 = new TermQuery(new Term(...));
booleanQuery.add(term1, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
term2 = new TermQuery(new Term(...));
bo
OK, so I'm currently doing this:
booleanQuery.add(new QueryParser(org.apache.lucene.util.Version.LUCENE_40,
"tags", new
WhitespaceAnalyzer(org.apache.lucene.util.Version.LUCENE_40)).parse(phrase[i]);
, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
I just want to add single terms to my booleanQuery. if I pass a q
I'm using the following code because I want to see the entire collection in
my query results:
//adding wildcards-term to see all results
rest = new TermQuery(new Term("*","*"));
booleanQuery.add(rest, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
But it doesn't work, I only see the relevant docs and not all the o
Is there a way to display Lucene scores per field instead of the global one
?
Both my query and my docs have 3 fields.
I would like to see the scores for each field in the results. Can I ?
Or should I run the query 3 times for each single field ?
thanks
I don't think the link you suggested can help, but maybe I'm wrong.
Also, the parameter MAX_HITS is not useful, it just limit the results, it
doesn't add the not relevant docs.
On 22 March 2011 12:10, Anshum wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> You may have a look at this, perhaps th
ll' documents or only docs matching your query?
> 2. if its about fetching all docs, why not use the matchalldocs query?
> 3. did you try using a collector instead of topdocs?
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:46
the queries after they're assembled. I believe you'll
> find that the difference is that the PhraseQuery would find text like
> "Term1 Term2 Term3" but not text like "Term1 some stuff Term2 more
> stuff Term3" whereas BooleanQuery would.
>
> Best
> Eri
I've been told search explain should be used for debugging only because it
slows down a lot computations. Is it true ?
On 22 March 2011 14:29, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Try Searcher.explain.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Patrick Diviacco
> wr
t
> you only cared about this for debugging. What is the use-case
> for having it on all the time?
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Patrick Diviacco
> wrote:
> > I've been told search explain should be used for debugging only becau
d is probably perferred.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Patrick Diviacco
> wrote:
> > OK, so I'm currently doing this:
> >
> > booleanQuery.add(new
> QueryParser(org.apache.lucene.util.Version.LUCENE_40,
> > "tags"
s:f14 tags:usm tags:canonef50mmf14 tags:canonef50mmf14usm
I can see the tags field repeated multiple times, so it seems to me
correctly parsed... correct ?
On 23 March 2011 07:50, Patrick Diviacco wrote:
> Your answer is quite clear, but my question is a bit more specific:
> as you s
ou may have a completely different option that you
> haven't read which someone could advice if they know the exact intent.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Patrick Diviacco <
> patr
ser to do it?
We know we could always modify QueryParser.jj to add them to the list,
but we'd rather like not to have to recompile/rejar each time there is a
new version of Lucene.
Thanks
--
Patrick Turcotte
-
To unsub
I've started to look into this (and the whole javacc syntax) I'll keep
you posted on my results.
Patrick
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Currently AND/OR/NOT are hardcoded into the .jj file. A patch to make
this configurable would be welcome!
Erik
On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Patric
runtime using the
ResourceBundle paradigm. I'll keep you posted.
Patrick
> -Message d'origine-
> De : karl wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 8 octobre, 2006 10:14
> À : java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Objet : Re: QueryParser syntax French Operator
>
>
to the those who can decide to
integrate it? Where? In what format? Etc.
Thanks,
Patrick Turcotte
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rocessing with matchedToken.image to get to the
matched string, set matchedToken.kind accordingly.
// USES fields set by the QueryParser to decide on behavior
}
Hope this answer your question.
Patrick
thanks,
-Mark
On 10/13/06, Patrick Turcotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
Submitted to Jira with key LUCENE-682
Patrick
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for the work. Create a bug in JIRA and upload a patch (see svn
diff). See the Wiki for information on how to contribute.
Thanks,
Grant
Thanks Mark!
I have to mention Benoit Mercier here who worked with me so we could
understand how to expand a term and use TOKEN_MGR_DECLS.
Patrick
On 10/13/06, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great work Patrick. I was unfamiliar with the use of TOKEN_MGR_DECLS.
Looks
like a pow
it possible? How would I go about it?
Design III
?
Thanks!
Patrick
I don't remember the syntax right now, but how about giving a boost to
certain fields, either while indexing or while searching ?
Patrick
On 10/30/06, Amit Soni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Erick,
Thanks for the reply.
Actually the priorities mean when i search for example for
I was referring to
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/analysis/ISOLatin1AccentFilter.htmlwhich
is in the
2.0 version of Lucene.
Patrick
On 10/31/06, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
actually yes, it would be a good result!
is the class you mentioned t
Should both results be returned in both cases?
If so, take a look at the IsoLatin1Filter class, it will remove those
accents for indexing and searching if needed.
Patrick
On 10/31/06, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello,
i use lucene to index documents in Italian. many
It will make mails list more easy to read (I am using gmail and I do
not have client-side filters).
That is not true.
You can have labels, and, if you look at the top of the page, right beside
the "Search the Web" button, you have a "create filter" link.
Patrick
Hi,
Did you take a look at IsoLatin1AccentFilter ?
Patrick
On 11/6/06, hans meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Lucene indexes documents from 3 different countries here
(English, German and French). I want to normalize some
characters like umlauts. ä -> ae
I did it in the
title","examples"
Take a look at org.apache.lucene.queryParser.MultiFieldQueryParser, it
probably does what you want.
Patrick
boost performance even more.
Don't hesitate to contact me directly if you have more questions.
Patrick
On 12/13/06, Mark Mei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the bottom of this email is the sample xml file that we are using
today.
We have about 10 million of these.
We need to know whether Lucene
On 12/14/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Patrick Turcotte wrote:
> I would suggest you take a look at exist-db (http://exist-db.org/).
I really doubt eXist can handle 10M XML files. Last time I tried it,
it choked on 20k of them.
It
previous location for next round, where
you won't need the initial copy to a fresh folder.
That way, you won't have to reindex all your documents (assuming only a
small subset needs updating) and will be able to switch to a more up to date
index more easily and often.
Patrick
On 12/20
) for more
info.
Patrick
On 12/22/06, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Non of the stemmers always stem to a valid word. It is not important as
you should be stemming the query as well. The only thing that is
important is that each word always stems to the same base. Many English
w
ll be optimized for you.
I think you can also use Luke (google Luke Lucene) to do this.
In any cases, I suggest you backup your index before trying, just to be
sure.
Hope this helps.
Patrick
On 2/7/07, maureen tanuwidjaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
May I also ask wheter there is a
Hi
You could try SOLR
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
This is obviously Java but you can access it using .NET...
Hope this helps
Patrick
On 09/02/07, Kainth, Sachin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
Does anyone know if there is a .NET version of Lucene Web Service?
Cheers
This
aybe you should consider using a stemming
analyzer instead. Look for stemmer filter/analyzer in contrib.
Patrick
Hi,
Please suggest what should be the query String for a pharse search.
Did you take a look at:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html ?
Patrick
Hi,
What we did was this:
1) When you application starts, it scans the index for terms values and
store them in a map or something.
2) When you receive "ajax requests", you compare with the map data and
return the relevant part. Works quite fast for us, without round trips
to Lucene
7;t Lucene wonderful!
Patrick
Mathieu Lecarme wrote:
> If you do that, you enumerate every terms!!!
> If you use a alphabeticaly sorted collection, you can stop, when match
> stop, but, you have to test every terms before matching.
> Lucene gives you tools to match begining of a term, just
something stupid... but I cannot think what to try next.
Thanks for your help
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
investigations as soon as possible.
Thanks for your help
Patrick
On 29/06/07, Doron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi Patrick,
Mike is the expert in this, but until he gets in, can you add details on
the update pattern - note that the DeletionPolicy you describe below is not
(afaik) related
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
