Re: Split package in Lucene 8.2.0

to avoid this issue. Philippe On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:29 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > this issue is known and cannot be solved by just patching lucene, it > affects the whole lucene infrastrcuture. A change on this would break > almost any app out there so it needs to be done on

Split package in Lucene 8.2.0

likely just moving classes in distinct packages which should not be too complex. Philippe [1] https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jsplitpkgscan

Memory consumption on lucene 2.4

by their index size what is good tool to do that (Luce?) and how ca we do such request ? Regards, Philippe -- Philippe Kernévez Directeur technique (Suisse), pkerne...@octo.com +41 79 888 33 32 Retrouvez OCTO sur OCTO Talk : http://blog.octo.com OCTO Technology http://www.octo.com

Custom similarity calculation ignoring fieldnorm

Dear Lucene group, I wrote my own Scorer by extending Similarity. The scorer works quite well, but I would like to ignore the fieldnorm value. Is this somehow possible during search time? Or do I have to add a field indexed with no_norm? Best, Philippe

Restore documents marked as deleted

the index leads to deletion of these documents. However, is there a possibility to avoid this? Or do I have to re-index all documents again? Best, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

Rank by Number of token

Hi all, I want to rank my query by the number of tokens in a field. What would be the best way to implement such a ranking? Regards, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

Rank results only on some fields

? Regards, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Get all terms of a specific field

. However, I did not fully understood your first idea. During indexing I can store the TermVectors on disk. What do I have to do during retrieval? I mean, does lucene automatically profit from the TermVectors? Or do I have to use something different instead of getValues(). Regards, Philippe Am

Get all terms of a specific field

and iterating the scoredocs is quite costly. So is there a better/faster way to perform this? Cheers, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h

Fastest way to get number of matching documents

Hi, for some queries I'm only interested in the number of matching documents. Is there a better/faster way to perform such a query, instead of retrieving all TopDocs and counting the number of totalHits [1]? And is it possible/worthwhile to deactivate ranking? Cheers, Philippe [1

Re: Fastest way to get number of matching documents

Hi Paul, thanks for the code. It is much faster than the implementation before. Cheers, Philippe Am 26.07.2010 16:25, schrieb Paul Libbrecht: Le 26-juil.-10 à 16:01, Michael McCandless a écrit : You can make a custom Collector? Ie, it'd just increment a counter for each hit. As long

Fast way to get all Terms in a matching query

around a QueryWrapperFilter. However, I wanted to know if anybody is aware of a faster solution? Regards, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user

Re: Different ranking results

StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_29)); 1.) Query q = parser.parse(lucene); 2.) Query q = parser.parse(TITLE:lucene OR BOOK:lucene); Regards, philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional

Re: Different ranking results

Well, that's difficult at the moment as I can also just reproduce this error for some few cases. But I will try to generate such an example.. Cheers, Philippe Am 22.07.2010 12:34, schrieb Ian Lea: No, I don't have an explanation. Perhaps a minimal self-contained program or test case

Different ranking results

); 2.) Query q = parser.parse(TITLE:lucene OR BOOK:lucene); Regards, philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Get lengthNorm of a field

Hi, is there a possibility to retrieve the lengthNorm for all (or a specific) fields in a specific document? Regards, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: Get lengthNorm of a field

method. Cheers, Philippe -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com Regards, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h

Sort by the number of matching fields

interested in documents containing the ids (5,6) so Document2 should be ranked higher than Document1. What would be the best way to perform this? Regards, Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr

Re: Sort by the number of matching fields

. The Problem is that the list of relevant ids is often changing... Regards, Philippe Ian Lea schrieb: I'm not sure I understand what you are asking, but if you search for id:5 id:6 then I think doc2 will be ranked higher, because it contains both fields. Or are you saying you want to rank based

RE: Is Lucene Java trunk still stable for production code?

, but that's just me! -Grant On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Jean-Philippe Robichaud wrote: Hello Dear Lucene Users! Back in the old days (well, last year) the lucene/java/trunk subversion path was always stable enough for everyone to use into production code. Now, with the 2.0/2.1/2.2

RE: Is Lucene Java trunk still stable for production code?

That's really wonderful. Everything gets cleaner now. Thanks, I mean really Thanks, for all the hard work that goes in Lucene code + Doc + Processes + Mailing list. Lucene is really something I refer other as what (open source) software development should be. I'll go with lucene_2_1 ! Jp

Is Lucene Java trunk still stable for production code?

Hello Dear Lucene Users! Back in the old days (well, last year) the lucene/java/trunk subversion path was always stable enough for everyone to use into production code. Now, with the 2.0/2.1/2.2 braches, is it still the case? In December, I 'ported' my app to use the lucene 2.0 release.

RE: Catalog backend for document stored fields?

[sorry for the long delay for my answer, we are having some issues with our mail server...] Thanks for your comment. Yes it would make sense if the log files were not so big. In fact, I'm only indexing a subset of the log information. Because I store the information in Lucene, it is easier and

RE: Catalog backend for document stored fields?

: Friday, October 20, 2006 5:00 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Catalog backend for document stored fields? On 10/20/06, Robichaud, Jean-Philippe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3- Any ideas on how else I could do this? I'm fully open to discussion! How about not storing

Catalog backend for document stored fields?

! Jp _ JEAN-PHILIPPE ROBICHAUD Speech Scientist Professional Services NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1500 University, suite 935 Montreal, Quebec H3A 3S7 514 904 7800 Office 514 843 6872 Fax http://www.nuance.com/ NUANCE.COM

RE: Occurence (freq) and ordering

Thanks for the Field.setOmitNorms(true) tip! Regarding the Similarity implementation I am trying to do, somehow it does not work. Here's what I understand: Scorer implementation uses the method defined in Similarity, to compute score. (the formula expressed in

TermFreqVector and performance, index size

are the OFFSETS and POSITIONS used for? Do I need it for Highlighting? Can I create the TermFreqVector on the fly for a document, or do I have to include them in the index? Philippe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Occurence (freq) and ordering

it in 1.9? I am just starting to read on Similarity, weights etc. Can someone give me a heads up? Thanks! Philippe Deslauriers

Optimizing insertion of duplicate documents

Hi Everyone, I have a special scenario where I frequently want to insert duplicates documents in the index. For example, I know that I want 400 copies of the same document. (I use the docboost of something else so I can't just add one document and set the docboost to 400). I would like to

Writting a custom query/indexSearcher

Hi everyone. I need a special query type that looks like a phrase query but with special logic inside (like allowing inversions of certain terms only and not of others, special score manipulation on certain 'events', ...) I wonder what approach I should take? How does someone build a custom

SimilarityDelegator examples ?

Hi Everyone, I've been using Lucene a lot and I would like to know how the SimilarityDelegator should be used. I would like to override only the lengthNorm member of the DefaultSimilarity and I understand that this is exactly the purpose of SimilarityDelegator ? Am I right? Does this class

RE: ACLs and Lucene

What about: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/luce ne/index/ParallelReader.java?rev=169859view=markup Jp -Original Message- From: Bruce Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 11:26 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE:

RE: PerFieldSimilarity

@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: PerFieldSimilarity Robichaud, Jean-Philippe wrote: How cool, I did not knew that... that may help me... If I understand you correctly, I can create a boolean query where each clause use a different similarity ? Yes. That would look something like: BooleanQuery

PerFieldSimilarity

Hi Everyone, I've been searching the archive without success to answer this one: is it possible to specify one similarity class per field, just like we can do with an analyzer ? I know I can change the similarity of the searcher, but that restrict me to break some complex queries into different

Implementation of a ScoreObject ?

, Exceptional Results Jean-Philippe Robichaud :: Solution Speech Scientist ScanSoft :: Professional Services 5100-75 Queen Street, Montreal, QC P +1 514 843 4884

RE: SPECIFIC HIT

___ SpeechWorks solutions from ScanSoft. Inspired Applications, Exceptional Results Jean-Philippe Robichaud :: Solution Speech Scientist ScanSoft :: Professional Services 5100-75 Queen Street, Montreal, QC P +1 514 843 4884 -Original Message