RE: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

Hi Glen, Is your source code available? I would like to have a look at it and check if whatever I have tried makes sense. --Regards, Rakesh S > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,

RE: Improving search performance

me > ideas to bring back HSearch and Lucene neck to neck performance wise. > I've also explained there why your HSearch vs Lucene perf test was not > fair. > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-194 > > HTH > > Emmanuel > > On

RE: Improving search performance

e > performance a bit if you work with a small pool of searchers instead of a > single searcher. > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > - Original Message > > From: Rakesh Shete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Improving search performance

hreads are running in the application server the CPU utilization is 100% and JBoss consumes all of the heap size. Any pointers on index optimization would be really appreciated. --Regards, Rakesh Shete _ No Harvard, No Oxford. We

Matching symbols like #,$,@

Hi all, I want to match a string like "ABC#$" with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@". The query string generated by QueryParse is as follows: title:ABC#$* I append the "*" so that it becomes a wild card search. It does not return me any records. I did try escaping '#' and '$'. But th

RE: Using multiple filters

ontrib/misc directory > > Erick > > On Jan 3, 2008 10:56 AM, Rakesh Shete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Here is the link I found on googgling: > > > > > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/org/apache/lucene/misc/Chai

RE: Using multiple filters

w them all together in a > > > ChainedFilter and use the ChainedFilter wherever > > > your calls want a Filter. > > > > > > But I haven't tried it ... > > > > > > Erick > > > > > > On Jan 2, 2008 2:28 PM, Rakesh Shete <[EMAIL PR

RE: Using multiple filters

, Rakesh Shete > Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:50:28 + > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Using multiple filters > > BooleanFilter in contrib is similar to ChainedFilter but just expresses > the boolean logic using the same vocab

Using multiple filters

Hi all, I have a query related to using filters. My search would something like this: title:java* +pricerange:[00100 TO 01000] +daterange:[2101 TO 20071231] which retrieves all books with title "java" that have a price between 100 & 1000 and a fall between Jan 01,2000 & Dec 31,2007 datera

RE: Boosting Vs Sorting

te: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:15:29 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Boosting Vs Sorting > > See below... > > On Dec 21, 2007 12:50 PM, Rakesh Shete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > >

RE: Boosting Vs Sorting

gt; > saying "I care about field X more than field Y across *all* > > documents". > > > > So index time boosting doesn't seem to relate to your problem since > > you really want to compare field x across all documents. It seems > > that query-tim

Boosting Vs Sorting

Hi all, I am using Hibernate Search (http://www.hibernate.org/410.html) which is a wrapper around Lucene for performing search over info stored in the DB. I have questions related to Lucene boosting Vs sorting: Is index time boosting of documents and fields better than specifying sorting para

RE: Lucene multifield query problem

Hey Doron, It worked It worked Thanks a lot for the help along with some valuable information about the API for creating queries. Will keep this in mind going ahead. --Regards, Rakesh Shete > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:19:53 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To:

RE: Lucene multifield query problem

eryParser, you should get the results you want with syntax like: > > > > +(i_title:indoor* OR i_description:indoor*) -i_published:false > > +i_topicsClasses.id:1_1_*_* > > > > Have you tried this yet? > > > > Steve > > > > On 12/18/2007

RE: Lucene multifield query problem

-i_published:false) but should have topic id of the form "1_1_*_*" (i_topicsClasses.id:1_1_*_*) i_title:indoor* i_description:indoor* -i_published:false +i_topicsClasses.id:1_1_*_* returns me extra results which should not be fetched. -- Regards, Rakesh Shete > Subject: RE: Luce

Lucene multifield query problem

Hi all, I am facing problem with the following multifield query: i_title:indoor* i_description:indoor* -i_published:false +i_topicsClasses.id:1_1_*_* The above query returns me even results which should not be there. Ideally I would like the query resullts as: (i_title:indoor* i_description: