Hi,
Is there a way to link indexed records in Lucene?
I am working with collections and a record might be a part of a
collection and this collection can again be a part of super collection.
So if the search result has the record, is there a way to find out all
the collections under which the reco
Hi All,
Any pointers on how to handle range queries if the data type is double
or float?
Best,
Urvashi
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
Why do i get the following warning messages? I couldn't find any
information in javadocs. I am using java version 1.4.2 and lucene
version 1.5.
Thanks for the help,
Urvashi
---
IndexingApp.java:131: warning: T
okay...so what are alternative methods i should use? Where can i get
the information?
Best,
Urvashi
Quoting Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: Why do i get the following warning messages? I couldn't find any
: information in javadocs. I am using java version 1.4.2 and lucene
: version
Hi All,
My system requires traversing Hits (search result) and extracting some
data from it. If the result set is very large my system becomes very
slow.
Is there a way to increase performance? Is there a way i can limit the
number of most relevant documents returned?
Best regards,
Urvashi
Hi All,
I am trying to filter my search using RangeFilter class but i get
BooleanQuery TooManyClauses exception.
Exception in thread "main"
org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses
at org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery.add(BooleanQuery.java:109)
at org.apache.lucene.search.Bo
Hi All,
I am trying index and search a phrase (multiple words seperated by
spaces). How should i index it so that it remains atomic. I have
observed that if i index the phrase are keyword, lucene doesn't let me
retrive the phrase in search.
Please advice.
Urvashi
---
Hi,
I am using ChainedFilter to combine various filters. No mattar which
logical operator i try to apply to all filters, when i try to print the
chained filters using toString() method, i see
ChainedFilter: [views:[0.4-0.6] level:[1-} ]
i am concerned about not being able to see the logical
Hello All,
My requirement is to combine 2 or more fields using some critera (for
example weighted average) and sort the search results based on the
combined fields.
I am looking at DistanceComparatorSource class to implement custom sort
but it takes only one field for calculation and then so
No...the information is available only at search time
Quoting Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Could your computation be done at indexing time rather than at search
time? If so, pre-compute the value and index that into a single
field.
Erik
On Apr 18, 2006, at 3:46 PM, U
scores. It will be painful if you need
more than 3 fields. So far I didn't find any other way to do it. Hope
we can see some new classes to address the problem. To be able to
customize ranking is very important to a search engine.
Yang
Urvashi Gadi wrote:
No...the information is availa
I am looking at DistanceComparatorSource class (for csutom sorting) and
looks like it calculates the distance for each record in the index and
not just the records returned from search, making the system very slow.
Is my observation correct? Are there ways to optimize this process?
Thanks,
Urv
12 matches
Mail list logo