Re: Changing the default FSLockFactory implementation

Yes, that’s what I need! Thank you! On 5/31/17, 1:58 PM, "Chris Hostetter" wrote: : We are experiencing some “Lock obtain timed out: NativeFSLock@” issues : on or NFS file system, could someone please show me, what’s the right : way to switch

Re: Collecting all stemming token

} Sincerely, --Xiaolong On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Xiaolong Zheng <zhengxiaol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying collect stemming changes in my search index during the > indexing time. So I could collect a list of stemmed word -> [variety > original word]

Re: Non-index files under the search directory

Regards, > András > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Xiaolong Zheng <zhengxiaol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks, StoredField seems still down to the per-document level, which > means > > for every document they will contains this search field. > > >

Re: Non-index files under the search directory

ield to each document to hold your information? > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Xiaolong Zheng > <zhengxiaol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to adding some meta data

Non-index files under the search directory

Hello, I am trying to adding some meta data into the search data base. Instead of adding a new search filed or adding a phony document, I am looking at the method org.apache.lucene.store.Directory#createOutpu, which is create new file in the search directory. I am wondering does indexwriter can

Re: Query the doc frequency across multiple search field.

> uses the max of the doc freqs as the aggregated doc freq. > > Otherwise, you can also compute this number by running a BooleanQuery with > one SHOULD clause per field. > > Le mar. 19 juil. 2016 à 19:08, Xiaolong Zheng <zhengxiaol...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > Hi, > &g

Query the doc frequency across multiple search field.

Hi, I want to know is there any way that query the doc frequency across multiple search field? The existing API seems only provide the query for a single search field: indexReader.docFreq(new Term(field, word)) Any suggestions that I could get the doc frequency from multiple field? Thanks

How to prevent WordDelimiterFilter tokenize the string with underscore?

Hi, How can I prevent WordDelimiterFilter tokenize the string with underscore, e.g. word_with_underscore. I am using WordDelimiterFilter to create my own Camel Case analyzer, I was using the configuration flag: flags |= GENERATE_WORD_PARTS; flags |= SPLIT_ON_CASE_CHANGE; flags |=

Searching for "iso surface", and looking for "isosurface"

Hi All, I want to know what's the common way to implement the searching with whitespace removal. For example, if I searching "iso surface" in google, it not only search for "iso" or "surface", but also have a search for "isosurface". Is that just simply add another search clause by removing the

Does Lucene 4.6.1 compatible with Java 8?

that they have not be tested? None of the bug fixes associated with the 4.8 release seem to be related to Java 8 compatibility. Any advises would be appreciated. Thanks, Xiaolong Zheng

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ignore a match in a query

-analysis/ Thanks, Xiaolong On 7/23/15, 1:56 PM, Fielder, Todd Patrick tpfi...@sandia.gov wrote: Unfortunately, that removes all records since all records have the term Record type -Original Message- From: Xiaolong Zheng [mailto:xiaolong.zh...@mathworks.com] Sent: Thursday, July 23

Re: ignore a match in a query

Maybe you can use the phrase search like: NOT \Record type\ On 7/23/15, 12:53 PM, Fielder, Todd Patrick tpfi...@sandia.gov wrote: Hi, I'm wondering if there is a way to ignore a match in a query? For example, I have two strings 1) Record type: record 2) Record type: cd I

Re: Lucene Upgrade from 2.9.x to 4.7.x

://lucene.apache.org/core/4_7_2/MIGRATE.html I would like to say number 5 is also very helpful. Thanks, Xiaolong Zheng On 5/29/14 9:56 AM, Buddhavarapu, Suresh suresh.buddhavar...@emc.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for some documents/information on upgrade from Lucene 2.9.x to 4.7.2