RE: lucene farsi problem

Hi Steve, i used the locale as ar and it works fine . again thanks a lot for your help. Esra Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Esra, On 05/06/2008 at 7:38 AM, esra wrote: i tried the class and it works fine with the locale parameter ar. Cool, I'm glad this addressed your problem! Actually

RE: lucene farsi problem

Hi Steven , Hi Steven, i tried the class and it works fine with the locale parameter ar. Actually we are using fa for farsi and ar for arabic. I have added a little control for the locale parameter in my code and now i can see the correct results. Thank you very much for ypur help. Esra

RE: lucene farsi problem

Hi Steven, thanks for your help Esra Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Esra, I have created an issue for this - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1279. I'll try to take a crack at a patch this weekend. Steve On 05/02/2008 at 12:55 PM, esra wrote: Hi Steven , yes

RE: lucene farsi problem

Hi Steven, sorry i made a mistake. unicodes are like this: د=U+62F ژ = U+632 and the first letter of ساب ووفر is س = U+633 you can also check them here :http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/persian-alphabet.html Esra Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Esra, Going back to the original

RE: lucene farsi problem

Hi Steven , yes the correct one is ژ /ze/U+632. my problem is when i do search forد-ژ range. The result is ساب ووفر and this word's first letter is س and it's unicode is U+633 and it is not in the in the [ U+062F - U+0632 ] range. am i wrong? Esra Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Esra

RE: lucene farsi problem

this letter is not after the س letter but it's unicode is bigger than س letter's and the searcher works with unicodes. Esra Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Esra, You are *still* incorrectly referring to the glyph with three dots over it: On 05/02/2008 at 12:18 PM, esra wrote: yes the correct one is ژ

RE: lucene farsi problem

the lowerTerm is د and the upperTerm is ژ. And while comparing for the result ساب ووفر also takes the first letter as س and does the comparison for this letter. د=U+62F ژ = U+698 and the first letter of ساب ووفر is س = U+633 Esra, Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Esra, Caveat: I don't speak, read

Re: lucene farsi problem

=0) here keywordIndex is ساب ووفر. i also installed the luke.jnlp but i don't know what to check by Luke. Thanks, Esra Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote: I am not sure how Standard Analyzer will perform on Farsi. The thing to do now would be to get Luke and have a look at the actual document

lucene farsi problem

and the first letter of ساب ووفر is س = U+633 Do you have any idea how to solve this problem, there are analyzers for different languages , will this be usefull if so do you know where to find a farsi analyzer? I would bu glad if you help. thanks , Esra -- View this message in context: http

Re: lucene farsi problem

analyzer and found nothing also i am not sure it if would solve my problem or not. Thanks, Esra Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote: What Analyzer are you using? You might try looking in Luke to see what is in your index, etc. It also isn't clear to me what your documents look like. As for a Farsi