-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Can-you-use-reduced-sized-test-indexes-to-predict-performance-gains--for-a-larger-index
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Can-you-use-reduced-sized-test-indexes-to-predict-performance-gains--for-a-larger
I'd like to try some experiments to see if I can improve search
performance by changing analysis (e.g. adding/removing word bigrams or
commongrams), or by changing how I map my source records into Lucene
documents. The problem is that my index currently is about 1TB in size
and takes about 2-3
