Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-22 Thread jeffthorne
I am new to Lucene and going through the Lucene in Action 2nd edition book. I have a quick question on the best way to add fields to a document now that Field.Index is deprecated. Here is what I am doing and what most example online suggest: doc.add(new Field("id", dbID, Store.YES, Field.Index.NO

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-22 Thread Michael McCandless
We badly need Lucene in Action 3rd edition! The easiest approach is to use one of the new XXXField classes under oal.document, eg StringField for your example. If none of the existing XXXFields "fit", you can make a custom FieldType, tweak all of its settings, and then create a Field from that.

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-22 Thread Simon Willnauer
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > We badly need Lucene in Action 3rd edition! go mike go!!! ;) > > The easiest approach is to use one of the new XXXField classes under > oal.document, eg StringField for your example. > > If none of the existing XXXFields "fit", you can

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-22 Thread Michael McCandless
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> We badly need Lucene in Action 3rd edition! > go mike go!!! Once is enough :) Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com --

RE: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
simon.willna...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: Field.Index deprecation ? > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Michael McCandless > > wrote: > >> We badly need Lucene in Action 3rd edition! > > go mik

RE: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-22 Thread Igal Sapir
a-user@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com > > Subject: Re: Field.Index deprecation ? > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Simon Willnauer > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Michael McCandless > > > wrote: > > >&

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-23 Thread Simon Willnauer
t;> > -Original Message- >> > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] >> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:41 PM >> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com >> > Subject: Re: Field.Index deprecation ? >&g

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-23 Thread jeffthorne
Thanks for the response Mike and pointing me in the right direction. I see that TextField is indexed, tokenized, without term vectors StringField is indexed, but not tokenized If I wanted a stored field that is tokenized with stored term vectors would this be the recommended approach? FieldTy

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-23 Thread Michael McCandless
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:12 AM, jeffthorne wrote: > Thanks for the response Mike and pointing me in the right direction. > > I see that > > TextField is indexed, tokenized, without term vectors > StringField is indexed, but not tokenized > > > If I wanted a stored field that is tokenized with sto

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

2013-03-23 Thread jeffthorne
Thanks again for the help Mike. Much appreciated. Have a good one, Jeff -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Field-Index-deprecation-tp4050068p4050766.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---