2
>
> This would result in doc4, doc5, doc2, which is the desired behavior.
>
> Steve
>
>
> (12:30:14 PM) sarowe:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Iam Jabour [mailto:iamjab...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:22 PM
>> To: j
ult in doc4, doc5, doc2, which is the desired behavior.
Steve
(12:30:14 PM) sarowe:
> -Original Message-
> From: Iam Jabour [mailto:iamjab...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:22 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Hierarchical Fields
>
> Let
than token2?
>
> Steve
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Iam Jabour [mailto:iamjab...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 9:20 AM
>> To: lucene-group
>> Subject: Hierarchical Fields
>>
>> Hello, any one can help me with fie
1 to contribute
more to the score than token2?
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Iam Jabour [mailto:iamjab...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 9:20 AM
> To: lucene-group
> Subject: Hierarchical Fields
>
> Hello, any one can help me with fields?
&g
Hello, any one can help me with fields?
I have the same problem posted in
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/out?u=http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HierarchicalFields,
but I don't like the proposed solutions. I need a order field, like [
token1, token2, token3]
If a query match with toke