RE: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Steven A Rowe
Thanks Dawid. – Steve From: dawid.we...@gmail.com [mailto:dawid.we...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dawid Weiss Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 4:45 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Steven A Rowe Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information This is the e-mail you're looking for, Steven (it w

Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Michael McCandless
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Paul Taylor wrote: >> Hmm maybe that is enough, Im not sure. I'm profiling with YourkitProfiler >> and it doesnt show anything within the lucene classes so I assumed this >> meant they didnt contain the neccessary debugging info but I would have >> thought that -g

Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Dawid Weiss
This is the e-mail you're looking for, Steven (it wasn't forwarded to the list, apparently). Dawid -- Forwarded message -- From: Paul Taylor Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information To: Dawid Weiss On 29/04/2011 15:17, D

RE: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Steven A Rowe
Hi Paul, On 4/29/2011 at 4:14 PM, Paul Taylor wrote: > On 29/04/2011 16:03, Steven A Rowe wrote: > > What did you find about Luke that's buggy? Bug reports are very > > useful; please contribute in this way. > > Please see previous post, in summary mistake on my part. Okay... Which previous post

Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Paul Taylor
On 29/04/2011 21:14, Paul Taylor wrote: Hmm maybe that is enough, Im not sure. I'm profiling with YourkitProfiler and it doesnt show anything within the lucene classes so I assumed this meant they didnt contain the neccessary debugging info but I would have thought that -g is all I need tha

Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Dawid Weiss
Instead of profiling, provide some more info about the following: - what are the problematic (slow) queries -- are they generated from the code, are they parsed from text? What are they? Certain query types are slow(er) than other query types. - what is the index built from? Natural language (tex

Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Paul Taylor
On 29/04/2011 16:03, Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Paul, What did you find about Luke that's buggy? Bug reports are very useful; please contribute in this way. Please see previous post, in summary mistake on my part. The official Lucene 3.0.3 distribution jars were compiled using the -g cmdline a

RE: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Steven A Rowe
; Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 7:09 AM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information > > Is there a built debug version of lucene 3.0.3 so I can profile it > properly to find what part of the search is taking the time. > > Note:Ive already pr

Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Dawid Weiss
> lucene/Search that is taking the time, I also had another attempt using > luke > > but find it incredibly buggy and of little use > Can you expand on this too? What kind of "incredible bugs" did you see? Without feedback there is little progress, so bug reports count. Dawid

Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Simon Willnauer
Hey paul, you can simply checkout the tag or download the sources right? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/ or http://ftp.download-by.net/apache//lucene/java/3.0.3/ simon On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Paul Taylor wrote: > Is there a built debug version of lucene 3

Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information

2011-04-29 Thread Paul Taylor
Is there a built debug version of lucene 3.0.3 so I can profile it properly to find what part of the search is taking the time. Note:Ive already profiled by application and determined that it is the lucene/Search that is taking the time, I also had another attempt using luke but find it incred