Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread bhecht
rding to a specific value in a record to be indexed. Before I break my head understanding how this can be implemented, I wanted to know if this approach is correct? Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10353549 Sent from

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread karl wettin
7 maj 2007 kl. 10.02 skrev bhecht: This means I index and search using the same analyzer. I was interested to know if this is the way to go? That would be the way to go (unless you are really sure what you're doing). -- karl --

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread bhecht
scribes exactly my problem, and I just want to be sure this is how people with Lucene expiriance would have approached this problem. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10354930 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archiv

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread karl wettin
7 maj 2007 kl. 12.16 skrev bhecht: My question regarding "the way to go", was if it is a good solution to index a content of a table, using more than 1 analyzer, determining the analyzer by the country value of each record. I'm not sure what you mean, but I'll try. Do you ask if it makes

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread bhecht
Search", which allows only 1 analyzer to be defined. Thanks, I will post my problem now in the Hibernate search forum. Good day. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10355770 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list a

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread karl wettin
7 maj 2007 kl. 13.27 skrev bhecht: The last option seems to be the right one for me, using a stemmed and unstemmed field. I assume when you mean "unstemmed", you mean indexing the field using the UN_TOKENIZED parameter. No, I mean TOKENIZED, but not using a stemmer analyzer. -- karl

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread bhecht
field might not be found. Am I correct? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10357611 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread karl wettin
7 maj 2007 kl. 15.45 skrev bhecht: OK, thanks, I think I got it. Just to see if I understood correctly: When I do the search on both stemmed and unstemmed fields, I will do the following: 1) If I know the country of the requested search - I will use the stemmed analyzer, and then the

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread bhecht
ry entered ni a search, I will use the non stemming analyzer. Am I going the right direction? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10361747 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archiv

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-07 Thread Doron Cohen
bhecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/05/2007 10:26:27: > I have implemented my own analyzer for each country. > So as I see it, when I index these records, I want to > provide lucene, with a specific analyzer per record > i'm indexing. > > When a user performs a query in my JSF form, I will > us

Re: Multi language indexing

2007-05-08 Thread bhecht
: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10372286 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL