Thanks again Daniel,
It's working now. But for some reason, TermQuery is not working for me (i
think because I have special characters in the query). I replaced the
TermQuery with the query below and I got the results I was expecting.
Thanks
String escapedType = QueryParser.escape(type);
Que
On Dienstag, 26. August 2008, Andre Rubin wrote:
> Now I was the one who didn't follow: How do I add a query to an existing
> query?
Something like this should work:
BooleanQuery bq = new BooleanQuery();
PrefixQuery pq = new PrefixQuery(...);
bq.add(pq, BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
TermQuery tq =
Now I was the one who didn't follow: How do I add a query to an existing
query?
Let me be more clear on my use case:
I have two documents:
1)
label:One Two Three
type:sequence
2)
label:One Two FOUR
type:other
I want to be able to make the same kind of search as you described earlier
using Pref
On Dienstag, 26. August 2008, Andre Rubin wrote:
> I just have one more use case. I want the same prefix search as before,
> plus another match in another field.
Not sure if I'm following you, but you can create your own BooleanQuery
programmatically, and then add the original PrefixQuery and an
That worked great! Thanks Daniel.
I just have one more use case. I want the same prefix search as before, plus
another match in another field.
I was using MultiFieldQueryParser.parse(), but then I have the same problem
with the "One Tw*" query, cause MultiFieldQueryParser.parse() returns a
Boolea
On Dienstag, 26. August 2008, Andre Rubin wrote:
> For some reason, the TermQuery is not returning any results, even when
> querying for a single word (like on*).
Sorry, I meant PrefixQuery. Also, do not add the "*" to the search string
when creating the PrefixQuery.
Regards
Daniel
--
http:/
For some reason, the TermQuery is not returning any results, even when
querying for a single word (like on*).
query = new TermQuery(new Term(LABEL_FIELD, searchString));
On 8/25/08, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Montag, 25. August 2008, Andre Rubin wrote:
>
>> I tried it out but w
On Montag, 25. August 2008, Andre Rubin wrote:
> I tried it out but with no luck (I think I did it wrong). In any
> case, is MultiPhraseQuery what I'm looking for? If it is, how should I
> use the MultiPhraseQuery class?
No, you won't need it. If you know that the field is not really tokenized
Hi all,
Let's say that I have in my index the value "One Two Three" for field 'A'.
I'm using a custom analyzer that is described in the forwarded message.
My Search query is built like this:
QueryParser parser = new QueryParser(LABEL_FIELD, ANALYZER);
Query query = parser.parse(LABEL_FIE
