On Tuesday 28 November 2006 12:12, Stanislav Jordanov wrote:
> Paul,
> we are using a slightly modified version of Lucene,
> so in order to run the performance tests on a nightly build, I need
> Lucene's sources, not the compiled classes.
> Is there a nice and easy way to get them?
The sources ar
Paul,
we are using a slightly modified version of Lucene,
so in order to run the performance tests on a nightly build, I need
Lucene's sources, not the compiled classes.
Is there a nice and easy way to get them?
Stanislav
Stanislav Jordanov wrote:
Paul,
We are working on delivering the next
Stanislav,
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 09:52, Stanislav Jordanov wrote:
> Paul,
> We are working on delivering the next release by the end of the week so
> I have to take care of 2 or 3 issues before I try the nightly build.
> I promise to try it and report the results here.
I have made a firs
Paul,
We are working on delivering the next release by the end of the week so
I have to take care of 2 or 3 issues before I try the nightly build.
I promise to try it and report the results here.
Best,
Stanislav
Paul Elschot wrote:
Stanislav,
Could you also try a nightly build to test the la
Switch to the old scorer (via BooleanQuery.setUseScorer14(true) )
solved the performance issue - now Lucene 1.9.1 & 2.0.0 perform on the
same load test just as 1.4.3 does
Thanks a lot Yonik!
Any chance there exists a non-professional explanation what's the
difference between old and new boole
On 11/21/06, Stanislav Jordanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've identified a significant querying performance decrease after
switching from Lucene 1.4.3 to 1.9.1.
It is steadily demonstrated no mater if the concurrent querying threads
are 1, 2, 4 or 8 (or even more) -
If N queries are executed a
: Could you also try a nightly build to test the later performance improvement
: on BooleanScorer2? The nightly builds are here:
: http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/java/nightly/
: The jar is called lucene-core-nightly.jar in the .tar.gz build.
:
: It's not likely that this is faster than th
Stanislav,
Could you also try a nightly build to test the later performance improvement
on BooleanScorer2? The nightly builds are here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/java/nightly/
The jar is called lucene-core-nightly.jar in the .tar.gz build.
It's not likely that this is faster than th
Hi guys,
We've identified a significant querying performance decrease after
switching from Lucene 1.4.3 to 1.9.1.
It is steadily demonstrated no mater if the concurrent querying threads
are 1, 2, 4 or 8 (or even more) -
If N queries are executed against 1.9.1 for a given time, then 1.4.3
execu
