Hi Uwe, Shai and Ian
Thanks for your help with this - I played around with your suggestions
and have got it to work perfectly. The problem was that the
CachingWrapperFilter was not passing the acceptDocs through to my custom
Filter, so I simply removed it.
Best regards
- Chris
On
Hi Uwe,
I guess you're probably a fed up with me and I apologise for the
hassle.
I realise I have asked a lot of questions in the last few days.
If you get a little time could you please have a think about this
problem as I am currently unable to move forward with it - I have tried
all the
Hi Uwe
I have downloaded Lucene 5.0.0 source to look at the Filters you
mention. DocValuesTermsFilter looks promising, however I cannot find
FieldCacheDocIdSet anywhere in Lucene 4.10.2 or in 5.0.0. Where should
I be looking?
I take your point about brute-forcing the DocValues search and
Hi Uwe, thanks for your suggestions. I have tried a couple of things
with no luck yet:
Sorry,
I just noticed, you are using TermFilter not TermsFilter: This one
does not support random access (using bits()). Because of this the
filtered docs cannot be passed down using acceptDocs.
Hi Chris,
Hi Uwe, thanks for your suggestions. I have tried a couple of things with no
luck yet:
Sorry,
I just noticed, you are using TermFilter not TermsFilter: This one
does not support random access (using bits()). Because of this the
filtered docs cannot be passed down using
Hi Shai
I thought that might be what acceptDocs was for, but in my case it is null and
throws a NPE if I try your suggestion.
What am I doing wrong? I'd like to really understand this stuff ..
Thanks
Chris
On 11 Mar 2015, at 13:05, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see that
-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bamford [mailto:ch...@chrisbamford.plus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:39 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Filtering question
Additional -
I'm on lucene 4.10.2
: Filtering question
Hi,
BooleanQuery:
-- Clause 1: TermQuery
-- Clause 2: FilteredQuery
- Branch 1: MatchAllDocsQuery()
- Branch 2: MyNDVFilter
Why does it look like this? Clause 2 should simply be:
ConstantScoreQuery(MyNDVFilter) In that case the BooleanQuery will
execute
Additional -
I'm on lucene 4.10.2
If I use a BooleanFilter as per Ian's suggestion I still get a null acceptDocs
being passed to my NDV filter.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Mar 2015, at 17:19, Chris Bamford ch...@bammers.net wrote:
Hi Shai
I thought that might be what acceptDocs was for,
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:07 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Filtering question
Hi
: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:07 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Filtering question
Hi,
BooleanQuery:
-- Clause 1: TermQuery
-- Clause 2: FilteredQuery
- Branch 1: MatchAllDocsQuery()
- Branch 2: MyNDVFilter
Why does it look like this? Clause 2 should simply
Can you use a BooleanFilter (or ChainedFilter in 4.x) alongside your
BooleanQuery? Seems more logical and I suspect would solve the problem.
Caching filters can be good too, depending on how often your data changes.
See CachingWrapperFilter.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Chris
I don't see that you use acceptDocs in your MyNDVFilter. I think it would
return false for all userB docs, but you should confirm that.
Anyway, because you use an NDV field, you can't automatically skip
unrelated documents, but rather your code would look something like:
for (int i = 0; i
Hi
Sorry for not getting back to you. Been swamped with stuff and work and
home. Just managed to check my lucene emails!
You are right i made some silly mistakes with the testcase and have updated
accordingly. The test is still failing but the properties are set
correctly:
public class
FWWI: a test case with multiple asserts is more useful if you clarify
where it failes ... ie: show us the failure message, or put a comment on
athe line of the assert that fails.
i didn't run your testcase, but skimming it a few things jumpt out at me
that might explain whatever problem you
Hi
Thanks for your reponse. Here is the following testcase:
public class UnderwriterReferenceTest {
private Directory directory;
private Analyzer analyzer;
private IndexSearcher indexSearcher;
private IndexWriter indexWriter;
private Document layerDocumentA;
@Before
Hi
I include a testcase to show what I am trying to do. Testcase number 3
fails.
Thanks
Amin
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman ami...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am looking at applying a security filter for our lucene document and I
was wondering if I could get feedback on
17 matches
Mail list logo
