ed the sortable
> fields as 'stored' then the process above would preserve those
> fields and hence sorting would proceed as normal.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Thanks
>
> Alan
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ould preserve those
fields and hence sorting would proceed as normal.
Does that make sense?
Thanks
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/14/2006 18:00
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: Newbie question: lucene sort
On 9/14/06, Alan Boshier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That was my understanding (that they had to be indexed) but
making them stored seems to have fixed the problem we were
seeing, which is odd.
Not being an expert on how lucene works internally, I'm
struggling to see how this change could have ma
Original Message-
From: Mordo, Aviran (EXP N-NANNATEK) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/14/2006 17:18
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: Newbie question: lucene sorting problems and stored
fields
AFIK, the field has to be indexed, but I don't think it
On 9/14/06, Alan Boshier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it a requirement when creating a field for sorting to
make it stored?
No, stored doesn't matter... it must be indexed though.
-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server
-
ssage-
From: Mordo, Aviran (EXP N-NANNATEK) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/14/2006 17:18
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: Newbie question: lucene sorting problems and stored fields
AFIK, the field has to be indexed, but I don't think it has to be stored
AFIK, the field has to be indexed, but I don't think it has to be stored
(but then again maybe I'm wrong)
Aviran
http://www.aviransplace.com
-Original Message-
From: Alan Boshier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:39 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subjec
