Couldn't one write a custom filter that modified the inbound term
semantics before doing the search? Then, wildcard behavior can be added to
terms without doing query string splicing.
> You might take a look at Ngrams. These can be used to find partial
> matches without resorting to wildcards, alt
You might take a look at Ngrams. These can be used to find partial
matches without resorting to wildcards, although they may add to
your index size...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Dirk Reske wrote:
> No, we don't want to user to write the * itself.
> And seperate fields for the f
Tokenizing and then passing through the query parser sounds reasonable
to me. You could build the query yourself, but that will be a bit
more work. You could also combine a non-wildcard search with a
wildcard search, boosting the first one. So that "John Doe" would
score higher than "Johnny Donc
In this case also, You may need to index the fields separately. This will
give better control. Have a parser, which splits the terms and applies * to
the end. Search using the terms.
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dirk Reske wrote:
> No, we don't want
No, we don't want to user to write the * itself.
And seperate fields for the first and the last name are also not
acceptable.
Image all the social networks, where you type a part of a name into the
textbox, and get all people whose names (first or last) contains one of
your searched words. The use
Yes. Correct. It would be good, If User inputs the search string with *.
My Idea is to index two fields separately first name and last name. Provide
two text boxes with first name and last name. Leave the rest to the User.
Regrads
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:44 P
Thanks, works like a charm.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Elschot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:05 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Simple Search Question.
On Monday 14 March 2005 19:59, Kyong Kwak wrote:
>
> I looked and didn't fi
This will help:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/index/TermEnum.html
Otis
--- Kyong Kwak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I looked and didn't find anything and wanted to know what the best
> way
> might be for getting a unique list of values in a given field?
> so if I hav
On Monday 14 March 2005 19:59, Kyong Kwak wrote:
>
> I looked and didn't find anything and wanted to know what the best way
> might be for getting a unique list of values in a given field?
> so if I have a field named "category" ( it's a keyword ) and I wanted to
> get all the unique values for th
