On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, McKinley, James T
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for responding to my message. Are you saying that you or others have
> encountered problems running Lucene 4.8+ on the 64-bit Java SE 1.7 JVM with
> G1 and was it on Windows or on Linux? If so, where can I find
is in order? For example, "we've found that the OpenJDK/Oracle
> 32-bit JVM (if only on Windows, say only on Windows) has a bug that when used
> in combination with the the G1 garbage collector causes incorrect code to be
> produced possibly resulting in index corruption", o
t the OpenJDK/Oracle
> 32-bit JVM (if only on Windows, say only on Windows) has a bug that when used
> in combination with the the G1 garbage collector causes incorrect code to be
> produced possibly resulting in index corruption", or something along those
> lines. It seems a
ng
G1GC with the 64-bit JVM given that it has better performance on large heaps
which are becoming more common today.
FWIW,
Jim
From: McKinley, James T [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 11:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
tigate it.
Jim
From: Erick Erickson [[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 2:22 PM
To: java-user
Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
The G1C1 issue reference by Robert Muir on the Wiki page is at a
Lucene level. Lucene, of
gt; G1GC has bugs as does CMS but we've found it to work pretty well so far in
>> our runtime system. Of course YMMV, thanks again for the info.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> From: Uwe Schindler [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January
yway), G1GC seems to
> work well with Lucene.
>
> Jim
>
> From: Piotr Idzikowski [[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:35 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4)
work well with
Lucene.
Jim
From: Piotr Idzikowski [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
Hello.
A little bit delay
gt; H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [email protected]
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: McKinley, James T [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:58 PM
> > To: [email protected]
om: Uwe Schindler [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
Hi.,
About G1GC. We consistently see problems when running the Lucene Testsuite with
G1GC enabled. The people fr
27, 2015 2:49 PM
> To: [email protected]; 'kiwi clive'
> Subject: RE: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
>
> Java 8 update 20 or later is also fine. At current time, always use latest
> update
> release and you are be fine with
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
> -Original Message-
> From: kiwi clive [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (
e
eMail: [email protected]
> -Original Message-
> From: kiwi clive [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
>
> Hi Hoss,
> Man
;[email protected]" ; kiwi clive
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
: I seem to remember reading that certain versions of lucene were
: incompatible with some java versions although I cannot find anyth
: I seem to remember reading that certain versions of lucene were
: incompatible with some java versions although I cannot find anything to
: verify this. As we have tens of thousands of large indexes, backwards
: compatibility without the need to reindex on an upgrade is of prime
: importance
15 matches
Mail list logo
