And, no RamDirectory does not help.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> Can you use filter queries? Filters short-circuit a lot of search
> processing. "City:San Francisco" is a classic filter - it is a small
> part of the documents and it is reused a lot.
>
> On Sat, May 26,
Can you use filter queries? Filters short-circuit a lot of search
processing. "City:San Francisco" is a classic filter - it is a small
part of the documents and it is reused a lot.
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Yang wrote:
> I'm using disjunction (OR) query. unfortunately all of the clauses ar
I'm using disjunction (OR) query. unfortunately all of the clauses are
optional
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Yang wrote:
> > I tested with more threads / processes. indeed this is completely
> > cpu-b
if you don't score but sort by id, it may be a little bit faster. but
for 3.x, you can hardly speed up by simpler scoring function. for your
situation, the bottleneck is cpu. you can speed up by paralleling. so
the best one is to split index and searching concurrently. so the cpus
can be fully used
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Yang wrote:
> I tested with more threads / processes. indeed this is completely
> cpu-bound, since running 1 thread gives the same latency as 4 threads (my
> box has 4 cores)
>
>
> given this, is there any way to simplify the scoring computation (i'm only
> using l
I tested with more threads / processes. indeed this is completely
cpu-bound, since running 1 thread gives the same latency as 4 threads (my
box has 4 cores)
given this, is there any way to simplify the scoring computation (i'm only
using lucene as a first level "rough" search, so the search quali
thanks a lot guys
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Ian Lea wrote:
> Lots of good tips in
> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveSearchingSpeed, linked from
> the FAQ.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Li Li wrote:
> > something wrong when writing in my android client.
Lots of good tips in
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveSearchingSpeed, linked from
the FAQ.
--
Ian.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Li Li wrote:
> something wrong when writing in my android client.
> if RAMDirectory do not help, i think the bottleneck is cpu. you may try to
> tune jvm
something wrong when writing in my android client.
if RAMDirectory do not help, i think the bottleneck is cpu. you may try to
tune jvm but i do not expect much improvement.
the best one is splitting your index into 2 or more smaller ones.
you can then use solr s distributed searching.
if the cpu is
在 2012-5-22 凌晨4:59，"Yang" 写道：
>
> I'm trying to make my search faster. right now a query like
>
> name:Joe Moe Pizza address:77 main street city:San Francisco
>is this a conjunction query or a disjunction query？
> in a index with 20mil such short business descriptions (total size about
3GB) take
10 matches
Mail list logo
