Jan,
The Pro JavaFX book was written with both academic and corporate
adoption in mind in terms of both the structure and content. During the
writing process we had the benefit of early feedback from Dr. Jan
Stelovsky of the University of Hawaii, who intends to use it as the
textbook for his
Yes it is. The authors of the book we given early access to javafx so
that the could keep th book up to date as javafx 1.2 was finished. It
is a good book.
- Josh, on the go
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:05 PM, Jan Goyvaerts
wrote:
> I'm searching for a book to give to students of a JavaFX cours
I'm searching for a book to give to students of a JavaFX course I'm giving.
I'd rather give them one really covering 1.2 instead of "being compliant"
with 1.2.
So, is this book covering 1.2 ?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
> why, that's crazy talk! :)
>
> On Jun 18, 20
why, that's crazy talk! :)
On Jun 18, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Jan Goyvaerts wrote:
> Really ? The storage, new controls and all 1.2 new features ? The
> authors would now upfront what was coming ! :-)
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:21 AM, jespdj wrote:
>
> I bought "JavaFX: Developing Rich Internet A
Really ? The storage, new controls and all 1.2 new features ? The authors
would now upfront what was coming ! :-)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:21 AM, jespdj wrote:
>
> I bought "JavaFX: Developing Rich Internet Applications" by Clarke,
> Connors and Bruno at JavaOne, it covers JavaFX 1.2.
>
> http:
I bought "JavaFX: Developing Rich Internet Applications" by Clarke,
Connors and Bruno at JavaOne, it covers JavaFX 1.2.
http://www.amazon.com/JavaFX-Developing-Rich-Internet-Applications/dp/013701287X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1245388810&sr=8-1
Jesper
On 14 jun, 14:20, Jan Goyvaerts wrote:
I've uploaded Charlie Nutter's CommunityOne talk on JRuby and the JVM
on YouTube. He provides insights into getting Ruby to work on the JVM.
Part 1 of 5.1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQh-LDArq7g
Part 2 of 5.1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTKpEfKJDjc
Part 3 of 5.1http://www.youtube.
I'm always happy to share NetBeans tips :) Somebody encouraged me to
write a blog series on it a while ago, I think I might just do that
since I can't really cover my daytime work in my blog these days...
Another cool thing about our Open Type and Open Symbol implementations
is that they work cr
I can imagine an area where it would be useful is if you have some
kind of data file, such as obfuscated JavaScript, or JSON data, and
you want to view it.
For some languages we have better ways to handle it. For both of these
scenarios (and XML etc), just hit Format (ctrl-shift-f). We will
prett
Thanks Tor for pointing out Ctrl-Shift-Cmd-O, didn't know of that one.
I didn't even think of this feature. I use Eclipse most of the time,
and I don't think Eclipse has this feature. I only know of Open Type
(Ctrl-Shift-T) and Open Resource (Ctrl-Shift-R).
--~--~-~--~~~--
maybe the were entering a one-line-coding-contest? i used to type
those as a kid in the back of Nibble and Byte magazine (in apple soft
basic with a ton of semicolons :)
On Jun 18, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Augusto wrote:
>
> I like this comment from the bug report;
>
> "This feature is necessary, fo
I feel similar. NetBeans is quite nice in many regards, but generally
lacking in terms of code hygiene. Between NetBeans not even
auto-formatting generated code and Eclipse fixing dozens of things as
"Save Actions" a lot is still to be done.
Let me elaborate. The premise is that I'm a bloody l
I like this comment from the bug report;
"This feature is necessary, for simple usability because is impossible
read a line code with thousands columns."
A line of code should never have "thousands of columns".
On Jun 18, 7:49 pm, TorNorbye wrote:
> On Jun 18, 4:26 pm, TorNorbye wrote:
>
> >
Indeed. In fact, we expect games to be the first big sellers. One of
our launch titles is a 3D swords and sorcery game called Runescape.
On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Augusto wrote:
>
> Looks good, I think a neat feature is that you guys are autogenerating
> the JNLP and for games are includ
one word: modules
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Robert Casto wrote:
> There are plenty of date pickers available for download. Why should
> one be bundled with the JVM and make it even larger?
>
> These guys should work on the language. If we want Swing to be
> updated, perhaps it should be d
yep. those are all on the list.
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Augusto wrote:
>
> This language feature should be at the bottom of your list. I rather
> get closures than this.
>
> But you guys are better off spending time finishing the more important
> bits of JavaFX;
> * Tooling
> * Components (
On Jun 18, 4:26 pm, TorNorbye wrote:
> On Jun 18, 11:18 am, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
>
> > Don't get me started on the deficiency of Netbeans. This feature is a must
> > and has been in all others IDEs forever.
>
> Maybe it's been in "all other IDEs forever", but I just fired up
> Eclipse 3.4 and
Yeah, NetBeans should add soft word wrapping.
Eclipse doesn't have it either (except for a third party plugin,
currently at version 0.0.2, which doesn't work with some languages and
apparently breaks line numbering) - but people coming to NetBeans from
for example TextMate certainly miss this fea
On Jun 18, 11:18 am, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
> Don't get me started on the deficiency of Netbeans. This feature is a must
> and has been in all others IDEs forever.
Maybe it's been in "all other IDEs forever", but I just fired up
Eclipse 3.4 and I can't find it. I'm sure it's there but I'm too
Casper Bang wrote:
> Sure, but it really would be faster to just guide you to the top 4'th
> voted item on the issue tracker:
> http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89894
>
Thanks.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywher
Sure, but it really would be faster to just guide you to the top 4'th
voted item on the issue tracker:
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89894
As I write somewhere among the comments, EditPlus is a good example of
the feature:
http://www.editplus.com/ss/editplus.gif
/Casper
On 18 J
Casper Bang wrote:
> Yes NetBeans HAS come a very long way but it's true its not there yet.
> For me, one of the few really big things missing now is line wrapping.
>
Can you elaborate?
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
have you tried the current production suite? it does this already
today. you just don't get the nice visual assembler. you can take
photoshop graphics and directly export them to fx, add some code, make
changes in photoshop, recompile and it works without any code changes.
On Jun 18, 2009,
Yes NetBeans HAS come a very long way but it's true its not there yet.
For me, one of the few really big things missing now is line wrapping.
I see people requesting this on the bug tracker almost every single
day.
/Casper
On 18 Jun., 20:48, Ryan Waterer wrote:
> Erlend,
>
> Netbeans has come a
The Adobe plug-ins allow the designer's Photoshop and/or Illustrator
work to be artifacts that you consume in the development process of a
JavaFX application. So there is no translation process of what it
looks like in photoshop to JavaFx. This can be a huge time saver,
especially when there are
On Jun 18, 2:18 pm, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote:
> I really like Netbeans. But until you get REAL editor support for JAVA, I
> can't use it.
Can't read your mind, so what do you feel is missing?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Erlend,
Netbeans has come a very long way in the last couple of years.
Since Tor has been talking about NetBeans, and the other Posse members have
commented how fantastic it is, I decided to look into it again back in
March. I now develop exclusively using Netbeans at home, and have started
the
if you want to develop in javafx go to javafx.com and download the
sdk. that's all you need.
the designer tool is a tool for designers. Our main target is for
content assemblers. People who take content from photoshop,
illustrator, video editing tools, etc. and combine them into a single
a
I am still a person that don't "get" JavaFX yet.
Why do I want to care that you have any features in Photoshop?
I work with designers, and their designs are ALWAYS a guideline.
No designer has the final word about what works technically anyway, so why
do I care?
A usability expert might, but that
Don't get me started on the deficiency of Netbeans. This feature is a must
and has been in all others IDEs forever.
Why the hell isn't JAVA a language that needs attention in Netbeans?
Since this is written in Java, why isn't this the main language supported
Java is the LEAST developed language of
So is the intention to install that for all the graphic manipulations
and then export as necessary, then switch to Netbeans with the JavaFX
plugin to do the coding? Will the Java FX Studio be instead of
photoshop, or complementary? I'm not sure I understand what I would
need to develop in JavaFX
Regarding "IDEs can only help to search for a class if I know its
name.":
As of NetBeans 6.5 you can search for symbols too (Navigate > Go To
Symbol -- Ctrl-Shift-Cmd-O), not just classes - I use that sometimes
when I can't remember the class name. If I remember the method, or
field, I'm after I
I would also like the Posse to discuss this topic on the podcast. I
already posted a question (#21) on the Google Moderator for listener
feedback. You can vote on the question. Perhaps someone wants to
rewrite the question.
I find it quite hard to find out what makes a feature; it's not always
ar
Well in the meantime you can have a preview of such debate (between
Eric Newcomer and Alex Buckley) in this thread;
http://modualrit.blogspot.com/2009/06/osgi-standard-questions.html
On Jun 18, 8:15 am, Augusto wrote:
> That sounds like a great idea :-)
>
> On Jun 18, 7:55 am, Mohamed Bana wrot
That sounds like a great idea :-)
On Jun 18, 7:55 am, Mohamed Bana wrote:
> why not have a debate? e.g., two people from osgi and jigsaw.
>
> 2009/6/17 Paulo Siqueira
>
>
>
> >> I like lots of content, too, but would much prefer two 45 minute
> >> podcasts to one 90 minite one.
>
> > I agree,
why not have a debate? e.g., two people from osgi and jigsaw.
2009/6/17 Paulo Siqueira
>
>
>
>> I like lots of content, too, but would much prefer two 45 minute
>> podcasts to one 90 minite one.
>
>
> I agree, it's easier to keep the listening up-to-date this way =)
>
> []s,
>
> --
> Paulo Rena
36 matches
Mail list logo
