As an aside on the topic of JavaFX I've recently been working with
JavaFX sequences and creating sequences of functions so I can callback
parts of my UI when changes occur in the data model:
//My list of closures
var callbacksOnAccountListChange:function(:String[])[];
//adding a closure to t
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> There were a few proposals that didn't make it that
> nevertheless received some positive feedback and went through a bunch
> of iterations (case in point: Neal's exception handling proposal!),
> that were nevertheless not shortlisted.
Quality over quantity is a fine goal, but I don't think we can
honestly claim coin did a particularly good job on that. As has been
said, over 90 proposals were submitted. The majority of them were
horrid.
On Sep 16, 10:22 pm, markmahieu wrote:
> On Sep 16, 4:32 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
>
always glad to help. javafx is a fun technology.
On Sep 16, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Dan Haywood wrote:
>
> Cool. I hoped that'd be the case, excellent to know so.
>
> Thanks for your time and the prompt answer!
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>
> On Sep 16, 11:13 pm, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
>> JavaFX can call any
Cool. I hoped that'd be the case, excellent to know so.
Thanks for your time and the prompt answer!
Cheers
Dan
On Sep 16, 11:13 pm, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
> JavaFX can call any Java apis, so if you can do it in Java you can do
> it in JavaFX. Yes, you can create any GUI widgets at runtime
JavaFX can call any Java apis, so if you can do it in Java you can do
it in JavaFX. Yes, you can create any GUI widgets at runtime. The code
below creates a column of rows, where each row has a label with the
name of the field and a text box to edit the value. I've ignored the
Java reflect
Sure... that was a rather vague question (and I think I probably
abused the term 'metaprogramming' horribly).
Anyhoo, my project builds a metamodel from the pojo domain model
(equivalent to a Hibernate .hbm model), and then we use this to
programmatically create widgets on the UI corresponding to
can you define what you mean by 'metaprogramming' in this context?
On Sep 16, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Dan Haywood wrote:
>
> Hi all, first post!
>
> Since we have knowledgeable people responding on another thread about
> JavaFX, I have another question, namely, is there any way to do
> metaprogramming
Hi all, first post!
Since we have knowledgeable people responding on another thread about
JavaFX, I have another question, namely, is there any way to do
metaprogramming in JavaFX. I currently work on an open source
framework (below) that builds a generic OO UI from a metamodel, built
up program
On Sep 16, 4:32 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Why are you
> surprised the community isn't putting in as many proposals as you
> wanted? Putting in that much effort writing excruciatingly boring JLS
> spec with virtually no guarantee is of course not going to find many
> takers.
I interpreted
I should add that now, with lambda expressions, the original
delegation model (in C# from Delphi) becomes somewhat obsolete. I've
heard Anders Hejlsberg talk about this as a redundant corner of C#
that he'd like to clean up but probably can't for reasons of backwards
compatibility.
/Casper
On 16
I haven't listened to the podcast yet, so I'm not sure what they were
referring to. I'm just demonstrating the JavaFX Script syntax.
What makes the syntax great (and an improvement over the Swing way) is
a couple of things:
closures, slightly cleaner than inner classes in Java
button.onMouse
I think you might have been misled by the unfortunate mixing of
concepts in the discussion, so I understand you would question this.
DELEGATES
For events, C# uses delegates which are type-safe method handles.
Normal delegates are strong references, much like in Java, so the
listeners will only be
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:03 PM, faysnyder81234
wrote:
>
> For javaposse group members. HD tube adult movies. Sorted by rating of
> millions users http://www.2watch4.com/redsdkp/includes/db/www/
>
So THESE are the perks of the javaposse-group?
I knew there had to be perks, never could I have ima
If that's all, I'm thoroughly confused.
button.onclick = mymethod
is some sort of revelation compared to:
button.addClickListener(#mymethod);
(yes, closures are nice things, and if that's what this is all about,
that's fine, but the word wasn't mentioned once in the entire podcast,
hence my co
For javaposse group members. HD tube adult movies. Sorted by rating of
millions users http://www.2watch4.com/redsdkp/includes/db/www/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to
Joe specifically complained about a lack of prototypes in various
places. Here's a verbatim quote from a comment he left on his own blog
( http://blogs.sun.com/darcy/entry/project_coin_final_five ):
> Project Coin explicitly encouraged prototypes as a way to demonstrate the
> feasibility and uti
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> On Sep 15, 11:28 pm, Bob Lee wrote:
> > I don't know where multicatch stands. You'll have to ask Neal and Joe. If
> > it's out, I'm sure there's a good reason.
>
> That's the crux of the situation, isn't it?
>
> Where's that reason? We
I've been a long term user of Apache Commons VFS which supports WebDAV, Zip,
FTP, SFTP and other file systems. It also has support for nested file
systems which allows a user to refer to a file within a zip file like this:
"tar:gz:http://anyhost/dir/mytar.tar.gz!/mytar.tar!/path/in/tar/README.txt"
in JavaFX you do this:
Button {
action: function() {
println("I'm doing stuff. Honest!");
}
}
the function above is actually a closure. You could also do this:
function doStuff():Void {
println("I'm really doing stuff this time");
}
Button { action: doSt
Haven't done delphi in 10 years, but it was something like this
(delphi people, i know this isn't correct, but it conveys the
concept):
button.onclick = mymethod
I believe that in later versions they did something like:
button.onclick += mymethod
that way you could have multiple listeners.
I
On Sep 15, 11:28 pm, Bob Lee wrote:
>
> I don't know where multicatch stands. You'll have to ask Neal and Joe. If
> it's out, I'm sure there's a good reason.
>
That's the crux of the situation, isn't it?
Where's that reason? We keep coming back again and again to the exact
same point:
If multi
Marcelo Fukushima wrote:
> there's a jvm argument that makes it dump the heap on OOME. i use that
> as a starting point and either jhat or visualvm to analyze it...
>
the process I've provided it quick and easy. Generational count tells
you exactly which object is leaking, heap walker tells yo
So, after listening to #278 (What do you want from JavaFX?), I'm
curious: How exactly do you 'just register' a listener and forget
about it? In what way is this different from the java experience. If
anyone could put some examples of either C# or delphi source here,
that'd be great.
--~--~
24 matches
Mail list logo
