Re: [The Java Posse] Syntax for default methods and order of type parameters changes. Both to the worse?

On Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:22:40 AM UTC+1, Roland Tepp wrote: > I must admit, the choice of the default value syntax for annotations felt > less than intuitive to me when I first saw it. > One can get used to it, but it still feels weird... > > New proposal for default method syntax kind of

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Don't be evil(?)

On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 07:12 -0800, Eric Jablow wrote: […] > > Accusing someone falsely of pedophilia is not a small lapse in > journalistic judgement. Covering up your fellow employees pedophilia > is not a small lapse in journalistic judgement. Not stopping your fellow > employees from raping chil

Re: [The Java Posse] Syntax for default methods and order of type parameters changes. Both to the worse?

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Casper Bang wrote: > However, Josh Bloch could clearly not copy all of C#'s attributtes given > the difference between the two languages. Alas, it seems like the "default" > keyword will carry 3 different semantics in Java 8. How so? In all three cases, it speci

Re: [The Java Posse] Syntax for default methods and order of type parameters changes. Both to the worse?

On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:59:16 PM UTC+1, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote: > > How so? In all three cases, it specifies a default value (in a switch, in > an interface and in an annotation). > > Seems semantically consistent to me. Much more so than, say, final. > > Just cautious of overloaded con

[The Java Posse] State of the Collections in Java 8

Here is a good summary from Brian of where things are in Java8's collections . -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@goo