On Nov 24, 9:00 pm, Casper Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why the requirement it be interpreted?
it makes it difficult to leverage the proejct code. If a build is
compiled and it references existing code then the build won't compile
until the existing code is compiled. I ran i
m I the only one who sees this need (it seems
like it)...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
yes. I've noticed the best/most successful projects are usually a
small team of really smart people. Not design by committee. The JCP
isn't appropriate for language design.
On Nov 22, 11:47 am, gafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 4, 3:40 pm, Patrick Wright <[E
his group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ou are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
se you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
a Perforce plug-in for it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
, with C# you can do the former as
if (myList.GetType().GetGenericArguments()[0] == typeof(String)) {
//
}
and the latter as
class Foo {
public void Bar() {
if (typeof(T) == typeof(String)) {
//
}
}
}
-Brett
On Nov 4, 11:16 pm, "Frederic Simon&q
claredProperties();
We would also need a corresponding java.lang.reflect.Property class,
or with your suggestion would this mean that java.lang.reflect.Field
would be extended to support property specific metadata?
-Brett.
On Nov 3, 3:51 pm, RogerV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My current pain poi
received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How about jdocs.com? They have javadoc for several libraries. Search
is there, so is modern interface.
On Oct 29, 6:02 am, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I (like Tor, I noted) pretty much use google exclusively for that.
> Sometimes it confuses me, sometimes I am sans
ya, it would have to be done all in local javascript. it's doable
tho.
On Oct 28, 9:24 am, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said in a previous email, search is not there yet but it's a
> feature we are working on. I don't know if it will make
-~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group
oup.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
se you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ave been
shared?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http:
reuse code?
- Does it work?
Discuss?
Karl
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options
ons project!
What I want to know is?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Wow, that news shocked me.
Probably means no "Java Puzzlers 2" book.
On Sep 26, 8:56 pm, Weiqi Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://twitter.com/gafter
>
> Casper Bang wrote:
> > Reference? Gafter did state his disappointments with SUN and their
> > lack o
--~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
use you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ng.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ogle Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
oment!
On Sep 22, 7:19 am, RogerV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hudson - CI build tool
> PMD/CPD - source code static analysis
> FindBugs - byte code static analysis
> Coberatura - test coverage analysis
> JLint - static analysis that can uncover threading issues
> Macker - enf
n the past.
On Sep 19, 12:27 pm, Casper Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There certainly are library catalogs available currently, their
> trustworthiness and discoverability is just somewhat questionable.
> Among those I turn to are:
>
> http://www.java-tips.org/java-libr
group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Ahhh the irony...a Java development environment that only works on one
platform.
On Sep 18, 11:26 am, "Viktor Klang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > out of curiosity, why does your app ne
Hi Craig,
Fair enough...the tooling point is a good one. I can only think of a
work-around (maybe an adapter class) to the issue you raise.
-Ken
On Sep 17, 2:21 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Yes, but as someone pointed out in the c
, I am not criticizing Ken for his
decision. It's just that, as someone who writes API for a living (and
has learned many lessons the hard way), I'm interested in the pros and
cons of the approach..
Craig
On Sep 17, 8:16 pm, Alexey Zinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On W
Hi Joshua,
Even if you sub-classed JComponent, couldn't you achieve the same
result by making your class final?
Craig
On Sep 17, 4:34 pm, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By using this factory system it means that the client developer cannot
> subclass the co
on the roundabouts!
Craig
On Sep 17, 11:59 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> At some level you have to expose the actual visual components, so yes,
> there is that constant. What is much cleaner though, is the
> presentation of the AP
Exactly.
On Sep 17, 11:34 am, Joshua Marinacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By using this factory system it means that the client developer cannot
> subclass the component. They can only instantiate and configure it.
>
> On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
.
If Swing were redesigned, I suspect they would avoid the deep
hierarchies that have become so unwieldy.
-Ken
On Sep 17, 3:31 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> In the end, don't you expose exactly the same API whether you deri
Hi Alexey,
In the end, don't you expose exactly the same API whether you derive
from JComponent or return JComponent via an accessor method?
I'm not necessarily arguing against doing it, I'm just playing devil's
advocate!
Craig.
On Sep 17, 3:54 am, Alexey <[EMAIL P
m
does. However, one of the other rules is to keep the API as small as
possible, but no smaller, which this design pattern/idiom promotes. I
guess what you gain on the swings (no pun intended) you lose on the
roundabouts!
Craig.
On Sep 16, 2:40 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTE
he
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
and people say Java is verbose don't know why ;)
On Sep 10, 2:13 pm, Christian Catchpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And again with the typos.. I havn't compiled it..
>
> public static Object[] expandArray(Object[] source) {
> Object[] result =
&
s the route I wanted to take, much like iTunes did.
-Ken
On Sep 9, 4:20 am, BoD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is this using native calls? If not, what does it
> look like on windows?
>
> BoD
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In case anyone's
posse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
up.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
d email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
43 matches
Mail list logo
