...or too late (but not really since pre Java 7 was never an option)?
I think the complexity of these proposed Closures are just right for
Java. Not so for Rock Start Programmers, but for 90% of us.
Syntax takes getting used to, but that's not biggie.
Less pitfalls than BGGA, that's what makes
mikaelgrev wrote:
...or too late (but not really since pre Java 7 was never an option)?
Too much for me - but above all I'd say that the decisional process is
in total confusion if first they say they'll add only project Coin
stuff, and then change their mind all of a sudden. Not a good
What spec are you reading. It clearly says Neal Gafter in the top
right corner. From what I hear it's trimmed down version of bgga with
fcm syntax.
On 11/18/09, Fabrizio Giudici fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it wrote:
Casper Bang wrote:
Yeah it's confusing, what made them suddenly change their
