What spec are you reading. It clearly says Neal Gafter in the top right corner. From what I hear it's trimmed down version of bgga with fcm syntax.
On 11/18/09, Fabrizio Giudici <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> wrote: > Casper Bang wrote: >> Yeah it's confusing, what made them suddenly change their mind? And >> doesn't this kinda portrait Coin as a joke (not wanting to touch the >> type system, only small changes etc.). It feels like a last minute >> 180, perhaps an attempt to keep up and not be characterized as a >> legacy language? (which the blogosphere has been saturated with the >> last couple of years) >> > RIght. > > BTW, it took a while for me to realize that the closures they're talking > about are neither BGGA nor CICE, but rather a simpler version based on a > proposal of Stephen Couleborne and Stefan Schulz. I've just read it - I > appreciate the minimalistic approach and it makes me worry much less > than BGGA - but it's not a finished proposal: I understand that there > are still some issues *in the specifications* to be resolved. So, we're > switching from "only small changes" to "let's put in a thing that is not > yet finished". Perhaps they plan to postpone the release? > > -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people > fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=. > > > -- Sent from my mobile device -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=.
