Absolutely. User experience is our top priority right now. You will
see continual improvements throughout this year.
On Feb 27, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Christian Hvid wrote:
>
> You guys are starting with the wrong problem.
>
> Development tools, language, frameworks doesn't really matter.
>
> It is
You guys are starting with the wrong problem.
Development tools, language, frameworks doesn't really matter.
It is whether it works at the end-user.
How fast it loads, whether there are obscure security dialogs, whether
graphics flashes and flickers ...
Solve that and you will have users and d
On Feb 24, 12:58 am, Alan Kent wrote:
> For my personal needs its things like tables with sortable columns with
> lots of values, so you need to lazily load subsets of the data (not
> download the whole lot and search). Fairly typical database access stuff.
I think that's what the Flex data gri
On Feb 23, 6:06 pm, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
> Hi Karsten. This is Josh from Sun.
Thank you for dropping in here!
> You are correct that JavaFX is not as mature as Flex and Sliverlight.
> This is simply because it is newer. When comparing JavaFX to these
> other toolsets please keep that in
5:58 PM
To: javaposse@googlegroups.com
Subject: [The Java Posse] Re: #230: JavaFX vs. Flash/Flex/Silverlight
Joshua Marinacci wrote:
> Components: JavaFX currently has only the TextBox component.
> ... we are planning a full set of new components
Any ETA on the components? How rich?
For my pe
Joshua Marinacci wrote:
> Components: JavaFX currently has only the TextBox component.
> ... we are planning a full set of new components
Any ETA on the components? How rich?
For my personal needs its things like tables with sortable columns with
lots of values, so you need to lazily load sub
Hi Karsten. This is Josh from Sun.
You are correct that JavaFX is not as mature as Flex and Sliverlight.
This is simply because it is newer. When comparing JavaFX to these
other toolsets please keep that in mind. JavaFX 1.0 was released only
about 3 months ago. But we are working very hard
On Feb 21, 6:49 am, Steven Herod wrote:
> I'm very much in favor of JavaFX - I've been working with it
> constantly since the 1.0 release, I think it has alot of potential,
> and it's allowed me to do things in Java on the client site I've
> never, ever been able to do previously.
>
> But it's no
I (and probably most people on this forum) would generally agree with
everything you said. Flash/Flex is generally a more mature platform
for most web RIA projects.
Personally, I'm really excited about JavaFX, I love the concise and
elegant syntax, but I don't think there is any game changing rea
My thoughts on the question
"So, why should we switch from Flex to JavaFX?"
is 'Don't do it, not yet - and maybe in some circumstances, not ever'
I'm very much in favor of JavaFX - I've been working with it
constantly since the 1.0 release, I think it has alot of potential,
and it's allowed me
10 matches
Mail list logo
