So while the flash experience is better for installation, it actually
appears to be heavier behind the scenes.
So if the new installer aids with this, it could be on to something.
On Sep 7, 11:29 am, RogerV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What motivated this posting is that I started with a fresh
I don't know if there will be an API for this, but it should be
technically possible. The most likely place for it would be an
additional service available to Java Webstart apps, similar to the
single launch service. Esp. now that both applets and webstart apps
share the same infrastructu
> Yep. The new plugin actually has a small headless instance of Java
> which does run inside the browser. This instance manages all of the
> other ones (since there are cases when there *should* be more than one
> worker instance). It will shut down and start up the worker instances
> as
What motivated this posting is that I started with a fresh blank WinXP
SP3 that I had installed Google Chrome on.
When I added the Adobe Flash Player for the first time, it was ready
to go in just a few seconds.
When I installed the Java 6 JRE that Chrome required, it was a lengthy
and involved
As a purely unscientific asides loading this page, using a Javascript
RIA based technology, adds 30MB to my Safari footprint
http://www.extjs.com/deploy/dev/examples/desktop/desktop.html
And loading this flex based demo site adds a 110MB
http://flex.org/showcase/
It's interesting, a f
On Sep 6, 2008, at 1:46 PM, RogerV wrote:
>
> When I installed the Java 6 1.6.0_10-rcb28 that Google Chrome is
> requiring, I didn't see anything new going on in the installation
> process. It looked to behave much as prior Java JRE installs.
>
> When is the optimized web install process going t
2 things:
1) I doubt (from what little I have seen) that silverlight is much
better, it may be "good enough" though, but its not as light at ajax
or flash.
2) I think lightness of process could also be useful for server apps
as well (as in many hosting environments people do actually want to
run
Demo of Draggable Applet:
https://jdk6.dev.java.net/plugin2/#EXPERIMENTAL_FUNCTIONALITY
If I understand correctly, applets by default are not draggable.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Poss
When I installed the Java 6 1.6.0_10-rcb28 that Google Chrome is
requiring, I didn't see anything new going on in the installation
process. It looked to behave much as prior Java JRE installs.
When is the optimized web install process going to show up? Or what
does it take to get that to happen i
Hi. This is Josh from the JavaFX team at Sun (posting from my gmail
account). I'd like to correct a few things you got wrong here:
> Now Safari, and most existing browsers that support Java, will
> typically run Java applets on the same JVM instance. So the overhead
> of the JVM gets shared amo
10 matches
Mail list logo
