RE: 3.4.10

on it, when you can have a version built in 2015, with a new, improved 2016 version just around the corner? Mike From: jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kann Sent: 25 February 2016 20:08 To: jbase@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 3.4.10 So if I have

RE: 3.4.10

: Re: 3.4.10 So if I have a client that is on 3.x and wants to get a new system and for some reason does not want to upgrade to 5.x he does not need to. Correct? Granted anyone new and anyone who wants to take advantage of the new 5.x features should go to 5,x anyway. On 2/25/2016 2:52 PM, Mike

Re: 3.4.10

5 is the way forward, is actively being developed and enhanced. Mike *From:*jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Richard Kann *Sent:* 25 February 2016 19:34 *To:* jbase@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: 3.4.10 So bottomline, I can have a Win 7 64b system, run

RE: 3.4.10

is the way forward, is actively being developed and enhanced. Mike From: jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kann Sent: 25 February 2016 19:34 To: jbase@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 3.4.10 So bottomline, I can have a Win 7 64b system, run Jbase

Re: 3.4.10

with the original version. Mike *From:*jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Richard Kann *Sent:* 25 February 2016 18:51 *To:* jbase@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: 3.4.10 Mike, So you are saying I did not have to go to 5.x? I was told if I wanted 64 bit I had

RE: 3.4.10

2016 18:51 To: jbase@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 3.4.10 Mike, So you are saying I did not have to go to 5.x? I was told if I wanted 64 bit I had no choice. Richard Kann Comp-Ware On 2/25/2016 1:32 PM, Mike Street wrote: The version that Alan is alluding to is a new build of jBASE 3.4.10

Re: 3.4.10

bit Windows platform. Mike *From:*jbase@googlegroups.com [mailto:jbase@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Richard Kann *Sent:* 25 February 2016 18:13 *To:* jbase@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: 3.4.10 Jbase 3.x is a 32 bit system and will not install on Win 7 64b. You can put a 32b version

RE: 3.4.10

@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 3.4.10 Jbase 3.x is a 32 bit system and will not install on Win 7 64b. You can put a 32b version of windows 7 on a 64b platform though. Richard COmp-Ware On 2/25/2016 11:45 AM, David Grenfell wrote: Good morning all: Just curious. I attempted an install on windows 7

Re: 3.4.10

Jbase 3.x is a 32 bit system and will not install on Win 7 64b. You can put a 32b version of windows 7 on a 64b platform though. Richard COmp-Ware On 2/25/2016 11:45 AM, David Grenfell wrote: Good morning all: Just curious. I attempted an install on windows 7, 64 bit and was rejected.

Re: 3.4.10

Zumasys actually has an install for 3.4 for Windows 64-bit. Alan Fields alan.fie...@verizon.net -Original Message- From: David Grenfell To: jbase Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2016 8:45 am Subject: 3.4.10 Good morning all: Just curious. I

Re: 3.4.10 on win7 printing delay

http://www.jbase.com/r5/knowledgebase/manuals/3.0/30manpages/man/env2_JBC_DESPOOLSLEEP.htmOn 06/16/14, David Grenfelld.grenf...@hotmail.com wrote:Hi all:When spooling out a report, there is a default delay of about 30 seconds before the printer starts printing. I remember seeing on this group

Re: 3.4.10 on win7 printing delay

Did you set the environmental variable JBC_despoolsleep to 1 as my sheet I sent you showed? On 6/16/2014 12:08 PM, David Grenfell wrote: Hi all: When spooling out a report, there is a default delay of about 30 seconds before the printer starts printing. I remember seeing on this group years

Re: 3.4.10 on win7 printing delay

NO From: Richard Kann Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 12:50 PM To: jbase@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 3.4.10 on win7 printing delay Did you set the environmental variable JBC_despoolsleep to 1 as my sheet I sent you showed? On 6/16/2014 12:08 PM, David Grenfell wrote: Hi all: When