Done. Will remember in future now that I have done this a couple of times :)
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 2:17 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-440167 ] null finder arg
> Tagging the m
User: mnf999
Date: 01/07/11 00:00:06
Added: pictures jboss.survey.zip
Log:
Andreas survey
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/pictures/jboss.survey.zip
<>
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[
User: mnf999
Date: 01/07/10 23:37:00
Modified:.navigation.jsp lists.jsp cvs.jsp head.jsp
Log:
new logo look pointing to forums
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +12 -7 newsite/navigation.jsp
Index: navigation.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 01/07/10 23:34:05
Modified:pictures head2.gif head3.gif
Added: pictures head000.jpg
Log:
new logo
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +9 -10 newsite/pictures/head2.gif
<>
1.2 +8 -9 newsite/pictures/head3.gif
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 22:52:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/lock/test Main.java
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/lock/test EnterpriseEntityTest.java
Log:
o updated lock test to excersise commit-option a, b (c & d but those are
not enabled at the moment).
o
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 22:52:09
Modified:src/resources/lock/META-INF ejb-jar.xml
Added: src/resources/lock/META-INF jboss.xml
Log:
o updated lock test to excersise commit-option a, b (c & d but those are
not enabled at the moment).
o abstracted the actuall te
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 22:52:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/lock/bean EnterpriseEntityBean.java
Log:
o updated lock test to excersise commit-option a, b (c & d but those are
not enabled at the moment).
o abstracted the actuall test outside of Worker, into Task s
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 22:52:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/lock/interfaces
EnterpriseEntity.java
Log:
o updated lock test to excersise commit-option a, b (c & d but those are
not enabled at the moment).
o abstracted the actuall test outs
Well, I have not been able to track it down fully, but I modified the
locktest to be a bit more agressive. First I simply up'd the thread and
iteration count (which could cause a NullPointerException in the entity
syncrhonization interceptor... but not all the time). It will also hang
some times
Next Monday (just read the orginal email, too).
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fw: "Using JBoss.org: A Java 2 Enterprise
Edition-based Container"
> I can't find it.
man! mad andy _knows_ teaser
you go check out the article that i write one day gets out :)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:07 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] F
I can't find it. Is it out? Do you have a url?
thanks
david jencks
On 2001.07.10 02:21:28 -0400 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi Geeks
>
> Look out my article about JBoss gets published. Hope you
> like it.
>
> Mad Andy
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Anglin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 20:49:42
Modified:src/examples cluster-run.bat
Log:
Moved the jbossmq-cluster.xml to the client directory since it is only used by
clients.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +10 -1 jbossmq/src/examples/cluster-run.bat
Index: cluster-r
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 20:49:42
Added: src/client jbossmq-cluster.xml
Log:
Moved the jbossmq-cluster.xml to the client directory since it is only used by
clients.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbossmq/src/client/jbossmq-cluster.xml
Index: jboss
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 20:49:42
Removed: src/etc/conf/default jbossmq-cluster.xml
Log:
Moved the jbossmq-cluster.xml to the client directory since it is only used by
clients.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 20:38:56
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.jcml
Log:
Added back the default queues and topics
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +38 -8 jbossmq/src/etc/conf/default/jboss.jcml
Index: jboss.jcml
==
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 20:23:40
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.jcml
Added: src/etc/conf/default jbossmq-state.xml
Log:
Change so that the state file used is configurable via JMX
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -0 jbossmq/src/etc/conf/default/jb
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 20:23:31
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmq/server StateManagerMBean.java
StateManager.java
Log:
Change so that the state file used is configurable via JMX
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +5 -1 jbossmq/src/main/org/jbo
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 20:05:58
Modified:src/build build.xml
Log:
Adjustment in rmic since the package org change some
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +6 -9 jbossmq/src/build/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:53:50
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmq/referenceable ObjectRefAddr.java
SpyConnectionFactoryObjectFactory.java
Log:
The objects are now serialized using a MarshalledObject and a ByteArrayOutputStream
This should help us work on
ok,
scott has put his finger on a solid fact, you can screw up your PK and the
cache key won't save you. It is not what I thought.
I think the point he makes is that even though the PK hashcode and equals
are really easy to screw up at least it is your responsibility as per the
spec.
Frankly w
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:52:16
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/pm/file MessageLog.java
PersistenceManager.java
PersistenceManagerMBean.java TxLog.java
Log:
These are the 3 PersistenceManager implementations we have so far. The a
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:52:17
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/pm/logged IntegrityLog.java
ObjectIntegrityLog.java PersistenceManager.java
PersistenceManagerMBean.java SpyMessageLog.java
SpyMessageLogTester.ja
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:52:17
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/pm/jdbc MessageLog.java
PersistenceManager.java
PersistenceManagerMBean.java TxLog.java
Log:
These are the 3 PersistenceManager implementations we have so far. The a
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:47:27
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/pm/file - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:47:11
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/pm/jdbc - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:46:19
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/pm PersistenceManager.java
TxManager.java
Log:
Making a more solid interface to the persistence manager.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/pm
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:46:29
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/pm/logged - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:26:25
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/il/uil - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:26:15
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/il/rmi - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:31:04
Removed: src/main/org/jbossmq/persistence IntegrityLog.java
ObjectIntegrityLog.java PersistenceManager.java
SpyMessageLog.java SpyMessageLogTester.java
SpyTxLog.java
Log:
T
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:31:42
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/pm - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:30:52
Removed: src/main/org/jbossmq/filepersistence MessageLog.java
PersistenceManager.java TxLog.java
Log:
This package has been moved under the pm package
___
Jboss-development ma
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:30:59
Removed: src/main/org/jbossmq/jdbcpersistence MessageLog.java
PersistenceManager.java TxLog.java
Log:
This package has been moved under the pm package
___
Jboss-development ma
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:29:31
Removed: src/main/org/jbossmq/multiplexor DemuxInputStream.java
MultiplexorTest.java MuxOutputStream.java
SocketMultiplexor.java StreamDemux.java
StreamMux.java
Log:
This p
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:28:34
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/il/oil OILClientIL.java
OILClientILService.java OILServerIL.java
OILServerILService.java
OILServerILServiceMBean.java
Log:
This is the il pack
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:28:34
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/il/rmi RMIClientIL.java
RMIClientILRemote.java RMIClientILService.java
RMIServerIL.java RMIServerILRemote.java
RMIServerILService.java
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:28:35
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/il/uil/multiplexor
DemuxInputStream.java MultiplexorTest.java
MuxOutputStream.java SocketMultiplexor.java
StreamDemux.java StreamMux.java
Log:
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:28:35
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/il/uil UILClientIL.java
UILClientILService.java UILServerIL.java
UILServerILService.java
UILServerILServiceMBean.java
Log:
This is the il pack
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:28:34
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/il/jvm JVMClientIL.java
JVMClientILService.java JVMServerIL.java
JVMServerILService.java
JVMServerILServiceMBean.java
Log:
This is the il pack
I have been trying to track down this transactional contention, then I ran
into a problem where the spooler eventually hung, after a seemingly random
number of messages.
SpyXAQueueConnection.createXAQueueSession() would not return from
SpyConnection.createReceiver().
SpyConnection.createReceiver
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:28:34
Added: src/main/org/jbossmq/il ClientIL.java ClientILService.java
ServerIL.java ServerILFactory.java
ServerILJMXService.java
ServerILJMXServiceMBean.java
Log:
This is the
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:26:04
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/il/oil - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:26:40
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/il/uil/multiplexor - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:25:53
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/il/jvm - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:25:14
Removed: src/main/org/jbossmq/distributed/interfaces
ConnectionReceiver.java
ConnectionReceiverSetup.java
DistributedConnectionFactory.java
DistributedC
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:25:15
Removed: src/main/org/jbossmq/distributed/server
ConnectionReceiverINVM.java
ConnectionReceiverOIL.java
ConnectionReceiverOILClient.java
ConnectionRecei
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:25:37
jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/il - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:07:40
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.jcml jndi.properties
Removed: src/etc/conf/default jbossmq.properties jbossmq.xml
Log:
JBossMQ is now tottaly configured via JMX. Changing config files to reflect that
Revision ChangesPath
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:05:10
Modified:src/examples TestClient.java SampleUtilities.java run.bat
Log:
Adjusted where the client classpath and what the where the connection factories are
named in JNDI
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2 jbossmq/src/example
User: chirino
Date: 01/07/10 19:03:16
Added: src/client jndi.properties jbossmq.properties
Log:
Adding these files here since client need them in thier CLASSPATH
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbossmq/src/client/jndi.properties
Index: jndi.properties
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 129
Successful tests: 128
Errors:1
Failures: 0
[time of test: 11 July 2001 2:47 GMT]
See http://lubega.com
I don't see why the burdon is not put on the primary key implementor. Its
clearly documented in the spec that hashCode() and equals() are required for
client use, so why not leverage this? What do we do in the general case of
an
unkown primary key class(type = java.lang.Object)?
9.2.9 Entity bean
Tagging the main branch is good, but more importantly the release branch
needs to
be tagged and this was not done. You need to add a Rel_2_4_0_15 tag to the
entire jboss cvs module in your working directory that has the Branch_2_4
checked out.
- Original Message -
From: "Vinay Menon" <[EM
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 17:29:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jms/ra JmsManagedConnectionFactory.java
Log:
o re-indent (no code change)
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +147 -157 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jms/ra/JmsManagedConnectionFactory.java
Index: JmsManaged
User: olegnitz
Date: 01/07/10 17:27:08
Modified:.jboss-castor.jsp
Log:
Added description of the new AutoStore attribute of the CastorJDO service.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +13 -10newsite/jboss-castor.jsp
Index: jboss-castor.jsp
===
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 17:20:04
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jms/ra JmsManagedConnection.java
Log:
o re-indent & fixup javadoc header (no code change)
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +389 -388 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jms/ra/JmsManagedConnection.java
Index: Jm
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 01/07/10 17:13:08
Modified:.binary.jsp
Log:
added latest JBoss-Jetty release
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +6 -0 newsite/binary.jsp
Index: binary.jsp
===
RCS
User: olegnitz
Date: 01/07/10 16:59:51
Modified:src/build build.xml
Log:
Added CastorJDO integration module to the main distribution,
because castor-0.9.1.jar is already here.
Revision ChangesPath
1.80 +8 -3 jboss/src/build/build.xml
Index: build.xml
=
User: olegnitz
Date: 01/07/10 16:59:51
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.jcml
Log:
Added CastorJDO integration module to the main distribution,
because castor-0.9.1.jar is already here.
Revision ChangesPath
1.44 +12 -2 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/jboss.jcml
User: olegnitz
Date: 01/07/10 16:59:51
Added: src/main/org/jboss/jdo/castor CastorJDOImpl.java
CastorJDOImplMBean.java
Log:
Added CastorJDO integration module to the main distribution,
because castor-0.9.1.jar is already here.
Revision ChangesPa
User: olegnitz
Date: 01/07/10 16:53:21
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jdo/castor - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: olegnitz
Date: 01/07/10 16:52:41
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jdo - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 16:49:14
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins
EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java
Log:
o re-indent (no code change)
Revision ChangesPath
1.40 +452 -451
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/EntitySynchroni
User: gropi
Date: 01/07/10 16:43:28
Modified:src/docs howtotimer.xml
Log:
typo
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -1 manual/src/docs/howtotimer.xml
Index: howtotimer.xml
===
RCS file: /cvsroo
User: gropi
Date: 01/07/10 16:28:43
Modified:src/docs howtovisualagedebug.xml
Log:
Update/rewrite of the VAJ integration guide for JBoss 2.2.2 and VAJ 3.5p2
Thanks to the author Craig Doremus
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +353 -448 manual/src/docs/howtovisualagede
This has now been patched in to Branch_2_4 and HEAD. The release has been
incremented to Rel_2_5_0_3 [pls let me know if this is incorrect...].
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:24 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bu
Oh ya, the vm the mdb runs in is now wedged and needs to be killed =(
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: kvvinaymenon
Date: 01/07/10 16:04:37
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc Tag: Branch_2_4
JDBCDefinedFinderCommand.java
Log:
Fix for checking null arguments in Finders and ensuring that the NULL sql datatype
is assigned to such a variable.
I thought I had my app working again, but that was just a dream. =| Does
anyone have a clue why I might be getting "Transactional contention on
context" messages?
I have one thread invoking a session bean in a loop, that session bean
creates two entities then queues a JMS message, then returns.
User: user57
Date: 01/07/10 15:45:41
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins
EntityInstanceInterceptor.java
Log:
o just a re-intent (no code change)
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +280 -277
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/EntityInstanceI
User: kvvinaymenon
Date: 01/07/10 15:42:32
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc
JDBCDefinedFinderCommand.java
Log:
Fix for checking null arguments in Finders and ensuring that the NULL sql datatype
is assigned to such a variable. (Bugs item #440
|> Why? Because Serialization includes the private state of the
|> object. This is
|> a perfectly valid PK which is not handled correctly by CacheKey. If the
|> _hashCode value is marked as transient all works. The assumption being
|> made by CacheKey is that the only ivars in the PK are its field
Toby Allsopp wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:48:15AM +0200, Vincent Harcq wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I want to add a feature that will allow to set the FetchSize associated with
>> Statement in Jaws/JBossPool.
>> The default FetchSize is in fact dependant of the driver (and is not always
>> 0, meani
Hi,
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:48:15AM +0200, Vincent Harcq wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I want to add a feature that will allow to set the FetchSize
> associated with
> > Statement in Jaws/JBossPool.
> > The default FetchSize is in fact dependant of the driver (and
> is not always
> > 0, meaning get all
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:48:15AM +0200, Vincent Harcq wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to add a feature that will allow to set the FetchSize associated with
> Statement in Jaws/JBossPool.
> The default FetchSize is in fact dependant of the driver (and is not always
> 0, meaning get all records), that's an
Many thanks Scott.
I'm a firestarter, twisted firestarter
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> Scott M Stark
> Envoyé : mardi 10 juillet 2001 20:32
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : [JBoss-dev] Fool proof? I think not.
>
>
> // TestPK
damn these *ucking emails.
--jason
On 10 Jul 2001, Postmaster wrote:
> MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER NOTIFICATION
>
> The following message:
>
> TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DATE: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:15:45 +0100
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] IT'S ALIVE!
>
>
> has bee
good catch scott,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:32 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Fool proof? I think not.
|
|
|// TestPK.java
|class AccountPK implements java.io
|I'm surprised it hasn't already happened:
|
|Maybe we could all mail him a core file - making sure it didn't contain
|the string 'xxx' or 'ad:' ?
LOL :) be nice, come on... don't
well... maybe a couple I got a really nice one here what is the sed grep
command...
marcf
|
|
|Jules
|
|
|Scott M S
I'm surprised it hasn't already happened:
Maybe we could all mail him a core file - making sure it didn't contain
the string 'xxx' or 'ad:' ?
Jules
Scott M Stark wrote:
> How long before this guy gets wacked from the list?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Postmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECT
10 seconds go there and remove the bastard
"Quarantined! your mails contains word(s)/phrase "bastard""
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:43 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [J
No it is just that I am doing "open heart surgery" without anethesia and you
guys see it all.
Cowboy administration with my balls on the tab key... not the best policy in
the world, but I want to be done by tonight (leaving tomorrow for spain)...
it should be up now
re the load: 95% idle LOL, B
How about whacking him on the head! By the way maybe until then we can
avoid using more than 2 ! or x/X characters in the subject of any e-mails.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I just togged nomail on him.
-- Juha
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> How long before this guy gets wacked from the list?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Postmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:22 PM
> Subject: [JBoss-de
How long before this guy gets wacked from the list?
- Original Message -
From: "Postmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Mail Delivery Status Notification
> MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER NOTIFICATION
>
> The following
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER NOTIFICATION
The following message:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DATE: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:15:45 +0100
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] IT'S ALIVE!
has been quarantined by Mail Essentials for the following reason(s):
Subject contains word(s)/phr
Feature Requests item #440169, was opened at 2001-07-10 12:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=440169&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
Bugs item #440167, was opened at 2001-07-10 12:24
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=440167&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned
did we just bring down the site with all the traffic?
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:07 PM
Subject: [JB
will do it if not today then tomorrow.
thanks!
vinay
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ROWID: Final Call :(
> vinay,
>
> chill, you have been here before. I recommendatio
// TestPK.java
class AccountPK implements java.io.Serializable
{
private int _hashCode = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
public java.lang.String id;
public AccountPK(java.lang.String id)
{
this.id = id;
}
public int hashCode()
{
if (_hashCode == Integer.MIN_VALUE)
{
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER NOTIFICATION
The following message:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DATE: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:07:12 -0400
Subject: [JBoss-dev] IT'S ALIVE!
has been quarantined by Mail Essentials for the following reason(s):
Subject contains word(s)/phrase(
I agree, I was a bit too enthousiast on this problem, it will cause
confusion. I leave it to you.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc
> fleury
> Envoyé : mardi 10 juillet 2001 17:42
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev
what what bothers me with this on-going discussion: we don't care whether
you fuck up your own hashcode or not, we wrap it up and afaik Bill plugged
teh last hole there, so that should really be tight as a drum...
show me a clear bug repro on this and I will buy it... if it is plain gone
then le
Yep.
I am working on 2.5. Checked out every week or so.
But the problem of Hiram is its hashCode of, "my hand in the fire".
> the changes of the cache are found in 2.5. I might retrofit them
> to 2.4 for
> other reasons.
>
> are you using 2.5 when you say the problems are gone?
>
> |I got
|Hey,
|
|Can those people using Tabbed indentation please turn it off? Please use
|spaces for indenting.
|
|Thanks,
right 1 tab == 3 spaces
marcf
|
|Bill
|
|> -Original Message-
|> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|> Dillon
|> Sent: Tuesday, July 1
Hiram,
Can you send a stack trace?
Thanks,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hiram
> Chirino
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Any problems vith the cache in 2.4?
>
>
>
>
go ahead and commit.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Vinay Menon wrote:
> Hello guys,
> Has anyone had the chance to take a look at the ROW ID thingey I had
> posted [3 times!]. I have not heard back from anyone and think that if we
> are NOT interested I should stop posting this question over and ove
Hey,
Can those people using Tabbed indentation please turn it off? Please use
spaces for indenting.
Thanks,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> Dillon
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
