[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/web/test TestWebIntegration.java

2001-10-04 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/10/05 00:23:05 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/web/test Tag: Branch_2_4 TestWebIntegration.java Log: Remove the ejb interfaces from the web war. Updated the access failures tests to assert that the error code was a 401 so that a c

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/build/subprojects build-web.xml

2001-10-04 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/10/05 00:23:04 Modified:src/build/subprojects Tag: Branch_2_4 build-web.xml Log: Remove the ejb interfaces from the web war. Updated the access failures tests to assert that the error code was a 401 so that a client browser would attempt a login. Rev

[JBoss-dev] unsubscribe

2001-10-04 Thread Roger Thomas
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/09/01 07:30:19 >>>these now use the new build system stuff from jboss-all.I did not change how the jboss-website outputs, so there is still nothingever put into the build/output directory.You will need to checkout jboss-docs again, since its CVSROOT/modulesmapping has

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-468195 ] The authentication logic is flawed

2001-10-04 Thread noreply
Bugs item #468195, was opened at 2001-10-05 00:07 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=468195&group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-10-04 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE Hello, The org.jboss.Shutdown class does

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-10-04 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 126 Successful tests: 107 Errors:9 Failures: 10 [time of test: 5 October 2001 6:26 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-10-04 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE Hello, The org.jboss.Shutdown class does

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-10-04 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 115 Successful tests: 101 Errors:12 Failures: 2 [time of test: 5 October 2001 5:16 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-468161 ] Errors in example build.xml file?

2001-10-04 Thread noreply
Bugs item #468161, was opened at 2001-10-04 20:57 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=468161&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonym

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Reply-To list is not coming back

2001-10-04 Thread Jason Dillon
Do you know much about news? inn in particular? --jason On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Peter Wone wrote: > I have a news server on a backbone. I've offered the use of it before, and > the offer > stands. > - Original Message - > From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[JBoss-dev] org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-10-04 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE Hello, The org.jboss.Shutdown class does

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-10-04 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 126 Successful tests: 107 Errors:9 Failures: 10 [time of test: 5 October 2001 4:6 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.

[JBoss-dev] org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2001-10-04 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE Hello, The org.jboss.Shutdown class does

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-10-04 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 115 Successful tests: 100 Errors:12 Failures: 3 [time of test: 5 October 2001 3:16 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: website-forums/src/web/forums footer.jsp header.jsp

2001-10-04 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/10/04 18:01:19 Modified:src/web/forums footer.jsp header.jsp Log: o updated footer/header Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -0 website-forums/src/web/forums/footer.jsp Index: footer.jsp

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: website-forums/src/metadata jive-web.xml

2001-10-04 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/10/04 17:58:40 Modified:src/metadata jive-web.xml Log: o patched jive.jar to hopefully fix the NPE's Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +5 -1 website-forums/src/metadata/jive-web.xml Index: jive-web.xml ===

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: website-forums/src/lib jive.jar

2001-10-04 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/10/04 17:58:40 Modified:src/lib jive.jar Log: o patched jive.jar to hopefully fix the NPE's Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +3354 -3301website-forums/src/lib/jive.jar <> ___ Jboss-deve

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/jvm JVMServerIL.java JVMClientIL.java

2001-10-04 Thread David Maplesden
User: dmaplesden Date: 01/10/04 16:26:45 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/jvm JVMServerIL.java JVMClientIL.java Log: Fix for a subtle bug. If messages are not copied on delivery to client and client then modifies the message and does a rollback, the modifi

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/pm/rollinglogged PersistenceManager.java

2001-10-04 Thread David Maplesden
User: dmaplesden Date: 01/10/04 16:28:28 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/pm/rollinglogged PersistenceManager.java Log: Fix a problem with cleaning up data files. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +5 -1 jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/pm/rollinglog

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq SpyTopicPublisher.java

2001-10-04 Thread David Maplesden
User: dmaplesden Date: 01/10/04 16:25:12 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq SpyTopicPublisher.java Log: No need to copy message in publish Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +2 -5 jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/SpyTopicPublisher.java Index: SpyTopicPublisher.java

RE: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-04 Thread Ignacio Coloma
You can document it as a bug on Sun. If it really is, they can confirm it. Only take care of NOT SPEAKING ABOUT any imaginary patch :) > -Mensaje original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Jung > , Dr. Christoph > Enviado el: jueves, 04 de octubre de 2001 9

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Reply-To list is not coming back

2001-10-04 Thread Andreas Schaefer
Yeah, but the sender can remove them (except the list) before sending. Andy - Original Message - From: "danch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Reply-To list is not coming back

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why do init, start, etc have to be done per deployment unit? (rh/3.0)

2001-10-04 Thread David Jencks
The reply to all "feature" is still biting... Thanks! Will this work? (first conceptually, then how much change would it take) I take it there are several queues for each persistence manager. A queue has a dependency (mbean ref) to a persistence manager. If the queue gets deployed first, it

[JBoss-dev] Why do init, start, etc have to be done per deployment unit? (rh/3.0)

2001-10-04 Thread David Jencks
Hi, When Marc put in the new classloading stuff for 3.0, he had each mbean being configured, inited, and started individually (although in the order of the *service.xml file). David Maplesden added some package depending on mbean dependency control and changed the config/init/start to do each st

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS-NET needs solid soldier

2001-10-04 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Providers are the "last" interceptors (there called handlers) in the Axis invocation chain. They are responsible for mapping a preprocessed Web-Service message-Context to a concrete target logic: Request-Transport --> Intermediate-Handler --> Deserialisation-Handler --> etc --> Provider --> Logi

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS-NET needs solid soldier

2001-10-04 Thread David Jencks
What does the EJBProvider do? Is it related to the invoker chains set up by ContainerFactory? I ask because I am working on setting up the invokers as independent (unlinked) mbeans with linking info carried in the MI, as discussed in the thread started by Rickard. Is this related or in conflict

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS-NET needs solid soldier

2001-10-04 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Thx Marc for the advertisement, as soon as the EJBProvider is working (targetted an integrated .wsr C .ear example by the end of this week), I will make up a nice web-page, some doco and set up sourceforge things (maybe Jason can help me with that), and send a proper announcement of the project,

AW: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-04 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Ole & others, IMHO, your nice patch has partly solved the problem, i.e., the issue that Sacha was noticing with the patch.jar NOT;-) applied. And even without patch.jar, it should have greatly diminished the deadlock possibilities ... But nevertheless, I could imagine a scenario, where a synch

AW: [JBoss-dev] java.lang.ClassLoader misery. Verify this patch!

2001-10-04 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hello David, -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2001 21:43 >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] java.lang.ClassLoader misery. Verify this >patch! >In my (unproven) opinion the problem comes from the loadCla

AW: [JBoss-dev] java.lang.ClassLoader misery. Verify this patch!

2001-10-04 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
My impression from the problemAgain stacktrace is that there was indeed a change in behaviour: Thread1 does call java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal() [instance CL1, no lock obtained] org.jboss.system.ServiceLibraries.loadClass() [instance SL1, no lock obtained] org.

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ thread model

2001-10-04 Thread Tobias Frech
There is a interesting thread on linux threads here: http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=52&thread=2273 tobi Ole Husgaard wrote: > > Hi, > > As most of you are probably aware, JBossMQ creates a _lot_ of > threads. This can be particularly annoying with native threads > Java VMs on Lin