Re: [JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread Greg Wilkins
Sorry, but I've been away from my computer, so I have not been able to contribute to this discussion But looking over what has been said - my quick response is If WARDeployer is handling the WEB-INF/lib jars *and* the WEB-INF/classes directory, then I think the simplest thing to do is to sw

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-513605 ] InitialStartDate Bug in Scheduler

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #513605, was opened at 2002-02-05 20:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=513605&group_id=22866 >Category: JBossServer >Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Corby (corby) >Assigned

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/util Scheduler.java

2002-02-05 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 02/02/05 21:28:49 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/util Tag: Branch_2_4 Scheduler.java Log: Fixed a problem with Initial Start Date in the future. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.4.4.3

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/util Scheduler.java

2002-02-05 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 02/02/05 21:25:13 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/util Scheduler.java Log: Fixed a problem with Initial Start Date in the future. Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +2 -0 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/util/Scheduler.java Index: Scheduler.java ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-513605 ] InitialStartDate Bug in Scheduler

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #513605, was opened at 2002-02-05 20:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=513605&group_id=22866 >Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Corby (corby) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (n

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-02-05 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 491 Successful tests: 481 Errors:1 Failures: 9 [time of test: 6 February 2002 5:13 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-02-05 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 491 Successful tests: 483 Errors:1 Failures: 7 [time of test: 6 February 2002 4:22 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-513605 ] InitialStartDate Bug in Scheduler

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Patches item #513605, was opened at 2002-02-05 20:16 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=513605&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Corby (corby) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymou

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-02-05 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 491 Successful tests: 481 Errors:1 Failures: 9 [time of test: 6 February 2002 3:22 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2002-02-05 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 491 Successful tests: 482 Errors:1 Failures: 8 [time of test: 6 February 2002 2:53 GMT] [java.version: 1.3

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system Server.java ServerMBean.java

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/02/05 18:20:48 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Server.java ServerMBean.java Log: o Added getHostName() & getHostAddress() Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +21 -1 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system/Server.java Index: Server.java =

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-511977 ] exception in addShutdownHook some JVM's

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #511977, was opened at 2002-02-01 16:10 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=511977&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Tulley (jtulley) >A

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment MainDeployer.java

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/02/05 17:58:42 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment MainDeployer.java Log: o changed a few info's to debugs o added exitOnShutdown flag to Server, which when set to true will call System.exit and when false will only invoke the shutdown hook. o

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system Server.java ServerMBean.java ServiceCreator.java

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/02/05 17:58:43 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Server.java ServerMBean.java ServiceCreator.java Log: o changed a few info's to debugs o added exitOnShutdown flag to Server, which when set to true will call System.exit and w

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss Main.java

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/02/05 17:58:42 Modified:src/main/org/jboss Main.java Log: o changed a few info's to debugs o added exitOnShutdown flag to Server, which when set to true will call System.exit and when false will only invoke the shutdown hook. o exposed exit() to c

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: build/jbossmx build.xml

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/02/05 17:01:26 Modified:jbossmx build.xml Log: o cleaned up unused bits. this file should be further customized to generate the proper distribution (via the release targets) to include the proper bits (as well as the proper versions identifiers a

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system Server.java

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/02/05 16:42:33 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Server.java Log: o catching & logging exceptions thrown when adding a shutdown hook o added gaurds around debug calls (for minor speed increase, since this uses the bootstrap logger fluff). Revis

Re: [JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread Jules Gosnell
Thanks, Marc, for taking the time to spell this out Hopefully Greg will come on line soon. I'm sure he'll have some comments. I'll get back to you all when I have had chance to think about this, probably tomorrow night. My gut feeling is that: 1. If a quick fix is available, perhaps we should

RE: [JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
Sorry thinking some more and answering some |2- Jetty CLs bypass the JDK parent delegation model and do |explicit creation |of classes from their classloaders. So any new class seen by Jetty is |loaded by Jetty CL, delegated to JBoss CL if not found. THIS IS SPEC |COMPLIANT. THIS COMPLETELY BR

RE: [JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
|We (Jetty) need to understand exactly how the new classloader strategy is |expected to work and what the contract between JBoss and Jetty has |now become, |with respect to this new behaviour, because we need to come up |with a solution |that will work for JBoss/Jetty and standalone Jetty. |> |I

[JBoss-dev] NullPointerException inorg.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStoreManager.getApplicationTxDataMap

2002-02-05 Thread Jules Gosnell
I'm doing a simple lookup by getPrimaryKey() for an EJB which I know IS there, then calling a method on it (getData()). AbstractHttpSessionData data=null; try { CoarseHttpSession ejb=_home.findByPrimaryKey(id); if (ejb!=null) { data= ejb.getData(); if (delete) e

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-498054 ] Cannot undeploy stateful session bean

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #498054, was opened at 2001-12-31 02:45 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=498054&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-482875 ] OutOfMemory after many Deploy cycles

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #482875, was opened at 2001-11-17 12:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=482875&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 7 Submitted By: Joel Boehland (jolby) Ass

Re: [JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread Jules Gosnell
Either : This is a new bug in Jetty - unlikely Or: It is a misunderstanding about ClassLoading between JBoss & Jetty - very likely since this has all reecently changed in JBoss. - much more likely. We (Jetty) need to understand exactly how the new classloader strategy is expected to work and

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504827 ] Example in the doc not comform to DTD

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504827, was opened at 2002-01-17 04:00 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504827&group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guillaume Coté (gcote) Assig

Re: [JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread Scott M Stark
WEB-INF/classes should not be handled by the unified class loader as web containers typically allow classes under this directory to be dynamically updated. - Original Message - From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dave Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Julian Go

Re: [JBoss-dev] login process with session and state

2002-02-05 Thread Jules Gosnell
  1. jboss-development is for JBoss developers - you should post this question in the forums hanging off www.jboss.org 2. get yourself a book on servlets, or look around the web for information on HttpSessions In JBoss3 /Jetty HttpSessions (where you store conversational state) will be able to be

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-504895 ] missing removal of lock on Entity Beans

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #504895, was opened at 2002-01-17 07:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=504895&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins StatefulSessionInstanceInterceptor.java

2002-02-05 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 02/02/05 14:03:27 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins StatefulSessionInstanceInterceptor.java Log: The security context must be established before the cache lookup because the SecurityInterceptor is after the instance interceptor

RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze?

2002-02-05 Thread Jason Dillon
What ever happened to the IIOP support? Is that stable and/or going to be included into the 3.0 release? --jason At 09:49 AM 2/5/2002 -0800, marc fleury wrote: >|I'm tootin hereBut calling for a freeze will get people up off >|there ass > >I did call a functional freeze, Dain is "function

RE: [JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
Jules, the unified deployer on WAR just delegates to you. I ignore the WEB-INF/classes although it would be quite trivial to deploy it at the UCL level. Should this be done internally to your deployer in which case you want to use a UCL to point to wherever to unpack the WEB-INF/classes (under

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-512826 ] RH shows quadratic behaviour in inserts

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #512826, was opened at 2002-02-04 08:26 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=512826&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42) Assigne

RE: [JBoss-dev] login process with session and state

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
this is the development list please post to the forum on clustering for your answer thanks marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |srinath |Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:49 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] login pro

[JBoss-dev] login process with session and state

2002-02-05 Thread srinath
I am working on a project which will have 2 web applications. First time user has to provide login and password. At that time I have to store his profile in the session and all the other requests to servlet/jsp by the same user should have access to that profile. That state expands to other inf

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-511280 ] principal=null after bean passivation

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #511280, was opened at 2002-01-31 08:49 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=511280&group_id=22866 Category: JBossSX Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Annegret Sternagel (annegret) >Assi

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-512826 ] RH shows quadratic behaviour in inserts

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #512826, was opened at 2002-02-04 08:26 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=512826&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42) Assigne

[JBoss-dev] Status of ear deployment

2002-02-05 Thread Dave Smith
I am using the current tip (9 am this morning). This ear deployed and worked before (the marc unified class loading) and now I am getting a class not found exception. Inside the war is WEB-INF/classes/tests/cadex/TestCompanyInfoBean.class and when I try to access it via a servlet I get (see b

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc JDBCStartCommand.java

2002-02-05 Thread David Budworth
User: dbudworth Date: 02/02/05 12:31:23 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc JDBCStartCommand.java Log: Fixed typo in log message Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +2 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/JDBCStartCommand

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-512760 ] Patch: Add NOT NULL for pk in createSQL

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #512760, was opened at 2002-02-04 06:08 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=512760&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matt (mpetteys) Assigned to: Nobody/

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-513441 ] ReadAheadCache patch to use 'page-size'

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Patches item #513441, was opened at 2002-02-05 11:42 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=513441&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole (unstable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Newcomb (mn

Re: [JBoss-dev] ReadAheadCache patch to use 'page-size' attribute

2002-02-05 Thread Scott M Stark
Submit patches through sourceforge pages: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1

[JBoss-dev] ReadAheadCache patch to use 'page-size' attribute

2002-02-05 Thread MNewcomb
This is a patch to ReadAheadCache.java that uses the 'page-size' attribute under the 'read-ahead' element. Michael <> Index: ReadAheadCache.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/ReadAhe

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosssx/src/main/org/jboss/security/auth/spi UsersRolesLoginModule.java

2002-02-05 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 02/02/05 10:59:04 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/auth/spi Tag: Branch_2_4 UsersRolesLoginModule.java Log: Fix problem with role assignment with users have a common prefix in their username. Bug #513245 Revision ChangesPa

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosssx/src/build build.xml

2002-02-05 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 02/02/05 10:57:42 Modified:src/build Tag: Branch_2_4 build.xml Log: Add org.jboss.security.Base64Encoder to the jboss-jaas.jar Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.11.2.8 +3 -1 jboss

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosssx/src/main/org/jboss/test LoginModulesTest.java roles.properties users.properties

2002-02-05 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 02/02/05 10:54:02 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test Tag: Branch_2_4 LoginModulesTest.java roles.properties users.properties Log: Add test of UsersRolesLoginModule with two users with a common prefix for bug #51324

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-510130 ] missing class in binary distribution

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #510130, was opened at 2002-01-29 05:29 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=510130&group_id=22866 Category: JBossSX Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Kaltz (jwkaltz) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-513245 ] wrong assigned roles

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #513245, was opened at 2002-02-05 02:48 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=513245&group_id=22866 Category: JBossSX Group: v2.4 (stable) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guenter Gartner (gartnerg) >Assigne

RE: [JBoss-dev] New Classloader Question

2002-02-05 Thread Ignacio Coloma
> Some time ago I was discussion the new JBoss > features and I told him about the new dynamic > classloader in JBoss. He then asked me what > happens with Class-variables when we drop > the old class and load the new class. This also happened since the beginning of the days when garbage collecto

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-484776 ] Dead connection in Pool

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #484776, was opened at 2001-11-23 00:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=484776&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bani Greyling (banigreyling) >Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-476565 ] GC pool contention throws exception

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #476565, was opened at 2001-10-30 15:06 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=476565&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-458168 ] PropVals for PrincipalMappingProperties

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #458168, was opened at 2001-09-03 14:20 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=458168&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Langelage (lafr) >Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-456257 ] entity may not be released on TX timeout

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #456257, was opened at 2001-08-28 12:45 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=456257&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assign

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-505657 ] ServiceConfiguration XML attributes

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #505657, was opened at 2002-01-18 22:07 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=505657&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer >Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan W. Phelps (nphelps)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-445705 ] Cannot use pk-constraint with mySQL

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #445705, was opened at 2001-07-29 08:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=445705&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.2.2 (stable) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assign

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite build.xml

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
User: mnf999 Date: 02/02/05 09:45:01 Modified:.build.xml Log: Oops : Revision ChangesPath 1.30 +2 -6 newsite/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/newsite/bui

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/common picabanner.jsp picateam.jsp team.jsp

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
User: mnf999 Date: 02/02/05 09:39:50 Modified:src/docs/common picabanner.jsp picateam.jsp team.jsp Log: Updated Website: updated team, updated partners Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +3 -1 newsite/src/docs/common/picabanner.jsp Index: picabanner.jsp ===

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup training.jsp

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
User: mnf999 Date: 02/02/05 09:39:50 Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup training.jsp Log: Updated Website: updated team, updated partners Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +0 -12 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/training.jsp Index: training.jsp ===

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs index.jsp testimonials.jsp

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
User: mnf999 Date: 02/02/05 09:39:50 Modified:src/docs index.jsp testimonials.jsp Log: Updated Website: updated team, updated partners Revision ChangesPath 1.38 +22 -69newsite/src/docs/index.jsp Index: index.jsp =

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/pictures bela2.jpg geraldbrose.jpg julia.JPG rs-jboss.gif Thumbs.db cogito.gif

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
User: mnf999 Date: 02/02/05 09:39:51 Modified:src/docs/pictures Thumbs.db cogito.gif Added: src/docs/pictures bela2.jpg geraldbrose.jpg julia.JPG rs-jboss.gif Log: Updated Website: updated team, updated partners Revision ChangesPath 1.2

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite build.xml

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
User: mnf999 Date: 02/02/05 09:39:50 Modified:.build.xml Log: Updated Website: updated team, updated partners Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +6 -1 newsite/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/loading/support/mlet MissingEndTag.mlet UnexpectedEnd.mlet BasicConfig.mlet

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 08:22:59 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/loading/support/mlet BasicConfig.mlet Added: src/main/test/compliance/loading/support/mlet MissingEndTag.mlet UnexpectedEnd.mlet Log: Revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management/loading MLet.java

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 08:20:45 Modified:src/main/javax/management/loading MLet.java Log: don't add the mbean to be registered until the MLET end tag is found. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +3 -4 jmx/src/main/javax/management/loading/MLet.java Index

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/loading MLetTEST.java

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 08:22:59 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/loading MLetTEST.java Log: Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +103 -5jmx/src/main/test/compliance/loading/MLetTEST.java Index: MLetTEST.java =

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx build.xml

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 07:02:38 Modified:.build.xml Log: also remove from system classpath to force mlet loading from jars Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +7 -1 jmx/build.xml Index: build.xml =

RE: [JBoss-dev] Optimized Class Location Marshalling versus Jasper *was* AW: [JBo ss-dev] CVS update: contrib/jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty JBossWebApplic ationContext.java

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
go ahead and give me times on the client marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oleg |Nitz |Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:36 AM |To: 'Jboss-Development' |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Optimized Class Location Marshalling versus |Jasper

RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze?

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
|I'm tootin hereBut calling for a freeze will get people up off |there ass I did call a functional freeze, Dain is "functional" he is CMP 2.0. is this clear? marcf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.ne

RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze?

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
|> completely off-topic but i couldn't resist: |> |> On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 03:18, marc fleury wrote: |> > Bill, you win, throw a party today, |> |> looking at bill's sourceforge login (patriot1burke) i guess that bill |> has already won sunday night and is still partying 8). good game by the |> pa

RE: [JBoss-dev] Optimized Class Location Marshalling versus Jasper *was* AW: [JBo ss-dev] CVS update: contrib/jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty JBossWebApplic ationContext.java

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
|-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung |, Dr. Christoph |Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:10 AM |To: 'Jboss-Development' |Subject: [JBoss-dev] Optimized Class Location Marshalling versus Jasper |*was* AW: [JBo ss-dev] CVS update: |cont

RE: [JBoss-dev] new ObjectName(String) is a pig

2002-02-05 Thread marc fleury
Ok so I will cache the ObjectName (I was planning on doing it today) marcf |-Original Message- |From: Trevor Squires [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:24 PM |To: marc fleury |Cc: David Jencks; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] new ObjectName(String)

RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze?

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Burke
I'm tootin hereBut calling for a freeze will get people up off there ass to finish stuff instead of hangin out > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc > fleury > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:29 PM > To: Dain Sundstrom > Cc

RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze?

2002-02-05 Thread Bill Burke
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Christian Riege > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:43 AM > To: marc fleury > Cc: David Jencks; JBoss Dev list > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze? > > > hi, > > completely off-

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx build.xml

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 05:23:21 Modified:.build.xml Log: delete some compiled classes so theyre loaded dynamically from the jars and not from the system classpath Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +14 -8 jmx/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading - New directory

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:53:10 jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading LoaderRepositoryTEST.java LoadingSUITE.java

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:57:57 Added: src/main/test/implementation/loading LoaderRepositoryTEST.java LoadingSUITE.java Log: test for demonstrating class conflict between two mlets Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jmx/src/ma

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading/support/mlet CCTest1.mlet CCTest2.mlet Start.jar Target.jar

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:57:58 Added: src/main/test/implementation/loading/support/mlet CCTest1.mlet CCTest2.mlet Start.jar Target.jar Log: test for demonstrating class conflict between two mlets Revision ChangesPath 1.1

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation ImplementationSUITE.java

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:53:35 Modified:src/main/test/implementation ImplementationSUITE.java Log: LoaderRepository test Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -0 jmx/src/main/test/implementation/ImplementationSUITE.java Index: ImplementationSUITE.java

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading/support AClass.java Start.java StartMBean.java Target.java TargetMBean.java

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:57:57 Added: src/main/test/implementation/loading/support AClass.java Start.java StartMBean.java Target.java TargetMBean.java Log: test for demonstrating class conflict between two mlets Revi

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading/support - New directory

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:54:14 jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading/support - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading/support/mlet - New directory

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:54:44 jmx/src/main/test/implementation/loading/support/mlet - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management/loading MLet.java

2002-02-05 Thread Juha Lindfors
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/05 04:50:59 Modified:src/main/javax/management/loading MLet.java Log: Fix: malformed URL with default codebase Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +4 -3 jmx/src/main/javax/management/loading/MLet.java Index: MLet.java ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-513245 ] wrong assigned roles

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #513245, was opened at 2002-02-05 02:48 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=513245&group_id=22866 Category: JBossSX Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guenter Gartner (gartnerg) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Optimized Class Location Marshalling versus Jasper *was* AW: [JBo ss-dev] CVS update: contrib/jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty JBossWebApplic ationContext.java

2002-02-05 Thread Oleg Nitz
Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: > Btw: We got rid of the location annotation by using our own MarshalledObject > implementation that uses subclasses of > MarshalledObject{InputStream/OutputStream} with annotateClass(Class) and > readLocation() methods disabled. This does not require to change the > ge

RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze?

2002-02-05 Thread Christian Riege
hi, completely off-topic but i couldn't resist: On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 03:18, marc fleury wrote: > Bill, you win, throw a party today, looking at bill's sourceforge login (patriot1burke) i guess that bill has already won sunday night and is still partying 8). good game by the patriots, was worth

[JBoss-dev] Optimized Class Location Marshalling versus Jasper *was* AW: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty JBossWebApplicationContext.java

2002-02-05 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Jules (Oleg!), just seeing your code line and guessing that it serves to support jasper with the right classpath for compilation ... I remember a (reasonable) patch that Oleg did yesterday and that lets the new unified classloaders return null for getURLs() in order to reduce the annotation

AW: [JBoss-dev] New Classloader Question

2002-02-05 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Andreas, -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Do we have to take care about this by transfering >the values if possible ? I think that this feature would be highly dangerous ... New classes, different variables, other semantics ... The dependency checker should care about redeploying the code t

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-435463 ] Distributed transactions

2002-02-05 Thread noreply
Bugs item #435463, was opened at 2001-06-22 07:10 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=435463&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v2.2.2 (stable) Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Ass