Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal

2002-03-16 Thread Jason Dillon
Sorry for the late response, but this doesn't exist right now, but could be implemented to add jboss dependency managmenet to j2ee deployables. Probably just :SomeObjectName... --jason Bill Burke wrote: >Can you put a dependency tag in jboss.xml? What's the syntax? > >>-Original Messag

Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal

2002-03-16 Thread Jason Dillon
> > >this is great, this is today in cvs, unless a certain someone removed this >as well. > =P >The problem is a painful russian doll structure. > >3- however there are 3 static directories deploy/first, deploy/second, >deploy/third, actually i could call them >deploy/deploy1, deploy/deploy2/dep

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 17-March-2002

2002-03-16 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 542 Successful tests: 525 Errors:10 Failures: 7 [time of test: 17 March 2002 5:38 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 17-March-2002

2002-03-16 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 535 Successful tests: 517 Errors:11 Failures: 7 [time of test: 17 March 2002 4:37 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 17-March-2002

2002-03-16 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 542 Successful tests: 525 Errors:10 Failures: 7 [time of test: 17 March 2002 3:15 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 17-March-2002

2002-03-16 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 542 Successful tests: 525 Errors:10 Failures: 7 [time of test: 17 March 2002 2:5 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 17-March-2002

2002-03-16 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 542 Successful tests: 524 Errors:10 Failures: 8 [time of test: 17 March 2002 1:21 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 17-March-2002

2002-03-16 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 542 Successful tests: 523 Errors:11 Failures: 8 [time of test: 17 March 2002 0:36 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-525412 ] EAR Deployment Problem with

2002-03-16 Thread noreply
Bugs item #525412, was opened at 2002-03-04 07:47 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=525412&group_id=22866 >Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec) >Assigned

Re: [JBoss-dev] deploy: the votes are in

2002-03-16 Thread Marius Kotsbak
I thought this worked in alpha (can't remember having any problem with datasource and jars)? If all .sar's (datasources) are deployed before the .jar's, it will solve my problem. Are there any dependencies at deploy time between .jars with beans and ejb-jar.xmls? ejb-links? Isn't most dependenci

Re: [JBoss-dev] deploy: the votes are in

2002-03-16 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 15-03-2 22.05, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My opinion still is that handling this automatically is the best solution, > by converting every kind of dependency into an mbean dependency. If we get > people used to numbering their files, then they will have a delightful > opportun

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-530672 ] JBossMX 1.0 testing

2002-03-16 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #530672, was opened at 2002-03-16 12:50 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=530672&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/query QueryTestCase.java QuerySUITE.java BasicQueryExpTestCase.java

2002-03-16 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/03/16 04:38:52 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/query Tag: BranchMX_1_0 QuerySUITE.java Added: src/main/test/compliance/query Tag: BranchMX_1_0 QueryTestCase.java Removed: src/main/test/compliance/que

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management AndQueryExp.java BetweenQueryExp.java BinaryComparisonQueryExp.java BinaryOpValueExp.java InQueryExp.java MBeanServerNotification.java MatchQueryExp.java NotQueryExp.java OrQueryExp.java

2002-03-16 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/03/16 04:38:50 Modified:src/main/javax/management Tag: BranchMX_1_0 AndQueryExp.java BetweenQueryExp.java BinaryComparisonQueryExp.java BinaryOpValueExp.java InQueryExp.java MBeanServerNotifi

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/server/registry BasicMBeanRegistry.java

2002-03-16 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/03/16 04:38:52 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/server/registry Tag: BranchMX_1_0 BasicMBeanRegistry.java Log: Relations, Queries and MBeanRegistry synched with head Revision ChangesPath No revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/javax/management/relation RelationService.java RelationServiceMBean.java RelationTypeSupport.java Role.java RoleList.java RoleUnresolved.java RoleUnresolvedList.java RoleValidator.java

2002-03-16 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/03/16 04:38:51 Modified:src/main/javax/management/relation Tag: BranchMX_1_0 RelationService.java RelationServiceMBean.java RelationTypeSupport.java Role.java RoleList.java RoleUnresolved.jav

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/query/support BooleanTest.java BooleanTestMBean.java NumberTest.java NumberTestMBean.java

2002-03-16 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/03/16 04:38:52 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/query/support Tag: BranchMX_1_0 NumberTest.java NumberTestMBean.java Added: src/main/test/compliance/query/support Tag: BranchMX_1_0 BooleanTest.java BooleanT

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/server MBeanServerTEST.java

2002-03-16 Thread Adrian Brock
User: ejort Date: 02/03/16 04:38:53 Modified:src/main/test/compliance/server Tag: BranchMX_1_0 MBeanServerTEST.java Log: Relations, Queries and MBeanRegistry synched with head Revision ChangesPath No revision No

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-530635 ] Lead developer needs some time off

2002-03-16 Thread noreply
Bugs item #530635, was opened at 2002-03-16 01:33 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=530635&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sorry Anonymous (concerneduser) Assigned to: Nobody/

Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL

2002-03-16 Thread Brian Sondergaard
Comments like this jeopardize the investment of a bunch of hard-working JBoss developers and an even larger number of corporate developers that are attempting to server as evangelists for the product. James politely made perfectly valid comments about his experience and offered intelligent sugges

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-530635 ] Lead developer needs some time off

2002-03-16 Thread noreply
Bugs item #530635, was opened at 2002-03-16 01:33 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=530635&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sorry Anonymous (concerneduser) Assigned to: Nobody/

Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL

2002-03-16 Thread Greg Wilkins
Guys, I'm not sure why James is getting flamed to such an extent for mostly saying that the Flashline system is not working??? Whatever - I just tested it and it worked fine for me??!?!?!? James' suggestion about a summary of the new features and current state is not a bad one. but I gues

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-530635 ] Lead developer needs some time off

2002-03-16 Thread noreply
Bugs item #530635, was opened at 2002-03-16 09:33 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=530635&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sorry Anonymous (concerneduser) Assigned to: Nobody/

Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL

2002-03-16 Thread Jason Dillon
Does it really matter that the wiki be j2ee? What about one just based on servlets? I expect that we will want to run a Java based system too... though that is kind of a shame, since there are lots of PHP apps out there which could complement JBoss.org. Anyways, I just took a quick look at th

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scanner URLDeploymentScanner.java

2002-03-16 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/03/16 00:40:44 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scanner URLDeploymentScanner.java Log: o Directory listings are now sorted as a shorterm fix for some deployment dependency issues. Revision ChangesPath 1.5

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/deployment DeploymentSorter.java

2002-03-16 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 02/03/16 00:40:44 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment DeploymentSorter.java Log: o Directory listings are now sorted as a shorterm fix for some deployment dependency issues. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +32 -1 jboss-system/src/main/org