Hi alls!
Have you recompiled with jdk 1.4?
Claudio
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo Argüello [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:16 AM
To: Francisco Reverbel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ?
Bugs item #527328, was opened at 2002-03-08 11:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=527328group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assigned
Yes, Claudio. I recompiled it with jdk 1.4.
Plain build and iiop build (-Dmodules=iiop) worked fine.
On the testsuite (-Dmodules=testsuite) I got a compilation error.
Cheers,
Francisco
Claudio Vesco wrote:
Hi alls!
Have you recompiled with jdk 1.4?
Claudio
Hi,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 532
Successful tests: 204
Errors:319
Failures: 9
The problem is in the parsing of conf/auth.conf. jboss-sdk1.4 crashes
when parses this fragment:
// Security domain for testing new jca framework
DefaultDbRealm {
//
// Security domain for new jca framework.
// One per ManagedConnectionFactory are required.
Hunter, Thomas,
Yea I agree that there should be an independent version as well. I was
thinking that the first round would require web/servlet support as well as
JAAS or JBOSSSX support. I really think this will be the norm. And with
all the support it should be fairly simple.
Thomas
Marcus,
I don't know the level of JSR 77 support at this time in JBoss and hadn't
thought about it.
Does anyone else know? I know this is the future and want it.
I did notice your patch. Nice use of JMX! wrapping the original bean and
extending the functionality, looks good.
Ken
-
OK, I have recompiled in Windows NT jboss with jdk 1.4 and I have the
exception.
Quick and dirty hack: start jboss with
JAVA_OPTS=-Dpolicy.expandProperties=false (see jboss.bat or jboss.sh) or
modify conf/auth.conf + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
Claudio
on 27-03-2 15.33, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
whats that ? where ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for my English :-)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fagerlund [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Vesco Claudio; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ?
on 27-03-2 15.33, Vesco Claudio at
on 27-03-2 16.18, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
modify passord in Default Db
have You tried instead of ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
on 27-03-2 15.15, Ken Sipe at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know the level of JSR 77 support at this time in JBoss and hadn't
thought about it.
look in test.managment.test
a servlet talking to the MEJB might be a good start ? i thought there was
one allready ?
/peter_f
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Vesco Claudio wrote:
Quick and dirty hack: start jboss with
JAVA_OPTS=-Dpolicy.expandProperties=false (see jboss.bat or jboss.sh) or
modify conf/auth.conf + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
Yes, this worked for me. Thanks, Claudio! Thanks, Xavier!
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2002/jw-0326-awards-p3.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Erm. quite honestly, those guys at Javaworld must have been drunk
when they made those awards. I mean, JBoss is quite good, and I'm using
it, but comparing JBoss 2.4.x and Weblogic 6.1 is ridiculous, they're
not even in the same league, as 2.4 doesn't even has clustering
support... If
I am trying to upgrade from 2.4 to 3.0 in order to use CMP 2.0. However, in moving my
application over to 3.0 I'm having trouble using the AutoNumber class. In 2.4 it was
in org.jboss.util; in 3.0 it is in org.jboss.varia.autonumber (so far, so good). In
2.4 it was available in ext/jboss.jar;
Yannick Menager wrote:
Erm. quite honestly, those guys at Javaworld must have been drunk
when they made those awards. I mean, JBoss is quite good, and I'm using
it, but comparing JBoss 2.4.x and Weblogic 6.1 is ridiculous, they're
not even in the same league, as 2.4 doesn't even has
I think some people might get offended about my last message, I can
imagine the flame throwers starting up *grin* But I want to explain why
I was shocked (in a negative way) about that javaworld award.
Unless I mis-read, that award was for BEST application server, comparing
it to BEA weblogic
Yes, that is true, but we are talking about J2EE application server Java 2
_enterprise_ edition and for such a server requires at least
clustering support ( even though I must admit weblogic 5.x didn't even reach those
basic requirements as they didn't support distributed transactions
Yannick Menager wrote:
...
But saying that JBoss can
do everything a commercial appserver like wls, is to raise expectations
in such a way that it can actually harm JBoss If some people have
high requirements in terms of scalability and fault tolerance, and
decide to use JBoss
Yannick Menager wrote:
Yes, that is true, but we are talking about J2EE application server
Java 2 _enterprise_ edition
Ah, the dreaded e-word. OK, so what's best depends on the
size/requirements of your enterprise :).
But if you mean enterprise as in bold and enterprising, as
on 28-03-2 00.25, Yannick Menager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
keep the flame throwers away :)
Listen - .
..
..
Once
-I was young
- a long time ago
- true
- when
Yes, of course it depends it the company's requirement, and also on
the design of the system. If the whole architecture is screwed up, no
matter how good the application server is, it won't cut it. And off
course JBoss has a major price advantage ( My own company's servers are
running on
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 563
Successful tests: 534
Errors:20
Failures: 9
[time of test: 28 March 2002 0:46 GMT]
[java.version:
That's absolutely true. I must admit my point of view when it comes to
enterprise is more in the area of large distributed system.. Like for
example Deutsche Bank trading systems are all J2EE based, and
*unfortunatly* initially based on weblogic 5.x. *arg* I won't tell
you how much
One thing to consider with the clustering argument is that there are
very many ways to skin that cat. I can get plain-jane stand-alone
Tomcat to scale sufficiently, and without too much work. I guess once
you get to distributed transactions, you need something better, that
built-in clustering
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
on 28-03-2 00.25, Yannick Menager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
keep the flame throwers away :)
Listen - .
..
..
Morse code? ?
Could be a
Yannick Menager wrote:
...
Like I mentioned in the other email, it's a question of
expectations. and that kind of award bumps up ALOT people's expectation
alot. And when it comes to this kind of products, you don't get many
chances to win people's hearts. If you burn them once, you
Isn't THE BEST determined in this case by user votes... so it is
always going to be scewed twords the varing oppion of the subset of
actual users of the product who took the time to vote, and more so by
the people who registered the product for voting in the first place.
THE BEST has
Oh, I *did* fail to notice the awards were based on user votes, now I
understand much better Well, anyway that's a good point ( the back
to work, that is ), I'll follow that thought :)
Jason Dillon wrote:
Isn't THE BEST determined in this case by user votes... so it is
always going to
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 562
Successful tests: 532
Errors:20
Failures: 10
[time of test: 28 March 2002 2:0 GMT]
[java.version:
User: chirino
Date: 02/03/27 19:08:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/server JMSDestination.java
MessageReference.java
Log:
Adding a new JDBC PersistenceManager/CacheStore. Better than the original:
- does not need the NoTransDS anymore.
- All SQL
User: chirino
Date: 02/03/27 19:02:45
jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/pm/jdbc2 - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 553
Successful tests: 525
Errors:20
Failures: 8
[time of test: 28 March 2002 3:8 GMT]
[java.version:
User: chirino
Date: 02/03/27 19:13:35
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceConfigurator.java
Log:
Added support for setting mbean attributes that are of the ObjectName or Property
type.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +27 -1
User: chirino
Date: 02/03/27 19:08:04
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mq/pm/jdbc2 PersistenceManager.java
PersistenceManagerMBean.java
Log:
Adding a new JDBC PersistenceManager/CacheStore. Better than the original:
- does not need the NoTransDS anymore.
Great job on JBossOne, Mark et al. Very informative
sessions.Pleasure meeting you and best of luck!
Brian
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 563
Successful tests: 537
Errors:20
Failures: 6
[time of test: 28 March 2002 4:48 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 556
Successful tests: 527
Errors:20
Failures: 9
[time of test: 28 March 2002 6:29 GMT]
[java.version:
The MESSAGE is more important than the details.
Pluggable, micro kernel, add-on products, add-on services, free base
product.
2.4/3.0 does not mind here.
You do not choose a product after reading a best of vote from anybody.
Jboss is recognized now.
Peace.
-Original Message-
From:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 563
Successful tests: 535
Errors:19
Failures: 9
[time of test: 28 March 2002 7:30 GMT]
[java.version:
41 matches
Mail list logo
