[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 9-August-2002

2002-08-09 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 897 Successful tests: 891 Errors:3 Failures: 3 [time of test: 9 August 2002 0:35 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.] [j

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-592495 ] Validate void return type for CMP setter

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #592495, was opened at 2002-08-08 10:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=592495&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Meadows (legerdemain)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-592495 ] Validate void return type for CMP setter

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #592495, was opened at 2002-08-08 08:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=592495&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Meadows (legerdemain)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-592495 ] Validate void return type for CMP setter

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #592495, was opened at 2002-08-08 10:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=592495&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Meadows (legerdemain)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-592495 ] Validate void return type for CMP setter

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #592495, was opened at 2002-08-08 10:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=592495&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Meadows (legerdemain)

[JBoss-dev] YAJI (Yet Another JBoss Invoker)

2002-08-09 Thread Francisco Reverbel
Hi, I am also playing with a new invoker. Well, not really new... It is actually the JRMP invoker code, with just a few changes to sent the Invocation over IIOP rather than JRMP. In the lack of a better name, I am calling it JavaIIOPInvoker. JavaIIOPInvoker is quite different from the plain I

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-593047 ] Bad web.xml resource-ref is't notified

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #593047, was opened at 2002-08-09 09:26 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=593047&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Marcano (robmv) Assigned

Re: [JBoss-dev] YAJI (Yet Another JBoss Invoker)

2002-08-09 Thread Holger Baxmann
... and runs _only_ on SUSE linux 8-) bax - Original Message - From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:12 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] YAJI (Yet Another JBoss Invoker) > Hi, > > I am also playing with a new invoker. Well, not rea

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-593047 ] Bad web.xml resource-ref isn't notified

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #593047, was opened at 2002-08-09 09:26 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=593047&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Marcano (robmv) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-593047 ] Bad web.xml res-auth isn't notified

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #593047, was opened at 2002-08-09 09:26 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=593047&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Marcano (robmv) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-562972 ] Error in PortableRemoteObject.narrow()

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #562972, was opened at 2002-05-31 09:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562972&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak) Assign

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-562972 ] Error in PortableRemoteObject.narrow()

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #562972, was opened at 2002-05-31 09:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562972&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak) Assign

[JBoss-dev] Container.getJmxName()

2002-08-09 Thread Alex Loubyansky
Hello! Recently, I had problems with scoped-EARs deployment. I checked the working test case and found that a bean despite of whether it has only a local interface must have unique besides . The reason is that Container's jmx name is constructed with the following method: public ObjectName getJ

Re: [JBoss-dev] Container.getJmxName()

2002-08-09 Thread Scott M Stark
This one: > Say, change jndiName in the getJmxName() as: > BeanMetaData bmd = getBeanMetaData(); > jndiName = bmd.getHome() != null ? bmd.getJndiName() : bmd.getLocalJndiName(); Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original

Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Container.getJmxName()

2002-08-09 Thread Alex Loubyansky
Scott, does it mean I should commit it? :) Friday, August 09, 2002, 7:39:36 PM, you wrote: SMS> This one: >> Say, change jndiName in the getJmxName() as: >> BeanMetaData bmd = getBeanMetaData(); >> jndiName = bmd.getHome() != null ? bmd.getJndiName() : bmd.getLocalJndiName(); -- Best regards

Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Container.getJmxName()

2002-08-09 Thread Scott M Stark
Yes. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:35 AM Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Containe

Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] Container.getJmxName()

2002-08-09 Thread Alex Loubyansky
I committed it to HEAD. Also I removed jndi-name tags from jboss.xml files in cts testcase where entities don't have home interfaces. I couldn't commit to Branch_3_0, because "commit" requires write access to the repository So, please, someone who has access update it. TIA, alex Friday, Augu

Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] Container.getJmxName()

2002-08-09 Thread Scott M Stark
There is only one level of commit access, so your 3.0 working directory must be checked out as anonymous or something. If you can commit to head you can commit to any branch. I'm working on a scoping issue so leave the branches to me. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer

Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] Container.getJmxName()

2002-08-09 Thread Alex Loubyansky
SMS> There is only one level of commit access, so your 3.0 working SMS> directory must be checked out as anonymous or something. If SMS> you can commit to head you can commit to any branch. But that's not my fiction. It's a quote. Maybe it was eventually. SMS> I'm working on a scoping issue so l

[JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-09 Thread Scott M Stark
When one registers an MBean that is a ClassLoader the BasicMBeanRegistry adds it to the the default LoaderRepository. This breaks scoped class loading of services, and it really seems to be out of the scope of functionality that the BasicMBeanRegistry should assume. Really I don't see why the Basi

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 9-August-2002

2002-08-09 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 897 Successful tests: 890 Errors:3 Failures: 4 [time of test: 9 August 2002 12:35 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.] [

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-593236 ] EJB query fails in 3.0.1RC1, ok in 3.0.0

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #593236, was opened at 2002-08-09 16:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=593236&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone) Assigned to: Nobody/Ano

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-593265 ] better deadlock detection

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #593265, was opened at 2002-08-09 17:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=593265&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v2.4.8 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-593268 ] FIFO queue for Connection pooling

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #593268, was opened at 2002-08-09 17:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=593268&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v2.4.8 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-593269 ] bind XAPool NonSerial

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #593269, was opened at 2002-08-09 17:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=593269&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v2.4.8 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (

[JBoss-dev] Castor XML users; can you drop some knowledge

2002-08-09 Thread Jason Dillon
Hiya, I am looking for someone who is familiar with Castor XML to bind XML to Java (and via versa). Basically what I would like is for you to take an example XML document, create the XML schema and either provide the impl classes or provide a runnable example to make use of the class generator.

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-593300 ] farm service update

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #593300, was opened at 2002-08-09 18:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=593300&group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymo

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-593319 ] JBuilder WAR in WinXP/Win2K

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #593319, was opened at 2002-08-10 00:37 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=593319&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-593319 ] JBuilder WAR in WinXP/Win2K

2002-08-09 Thread noreply
Bugs item #593319, was opened at 2002-08-09 17:37 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=593319&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD Matrix2) Testsuite Results: 10-August-2002

2002-08-09 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 896 Successful tests: 871 Errors:18 Failures: 7 [time of test: 10 August 2002 3:1 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1_03] [java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc

[JBoss-dev] µçÄÔÅä¼þµÍ¼Û¹©Ó¦

2002-08-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
̨ÖÐÊ¢´ï¼¯ÍÅ´ó½°ìÊ´¦ ÎÒ¹«Ë¾³¤ÆÚ¾­ÓªÔ­×°½ø¿Ú²úÆ·.ÏÖÓеçÄÔÅä¼þ.±Ê¼Ç±¾.±Ê¼Ç±¾Åä¼þ.ÊýÂëÏà»ú.ÉãÏñ»ú.ͶӰÉè ±¸. ͶӰ¸½¼þ.Æû³µ.ÊÖ»ú.<¼ÒÓõçÆ÷.²Êµç.¿Õµ÷.>.ÓÐÒâÔÚ¸÷µØ³ÏÕ÷´úÀíÖ±ÏúÉÌ. Ϊ±£Ö¤ÐÅÓþ ʵÐлõµ½¸¶¿î. Ò²ÐíÄú¶ÔÎÒÃǵļ۸ñÖ®µÍ±íʾ»³ÒÉ,µ«ÄúÊÇ·ñÖªµÀÎÒÃÇ´ÓµçÄÔÊг¡»òÉ̵êÂò»ØÀ´µÄ²úÆ·ÊǾ­ ¹ý¸÷¼¶´úÀí²ã²ã¼

RE: [JBoss-dev] Castor XML users; can you drop some knowledge

2002-08-09 Thread James Higginbotham
It just so happens that I was doing some of this work yesterday. I will send an email to you directly with a zip archive (as not to spam the general jboss group) of a generated XSD from your sample, and simple .bat to kick off Castor's src generator, and the resulting classes. James > -Orig

[JBoss-dev] Re:

2002-08-09 Thread sucivi
confirm 105513 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists