Bugs item #594563, was opened at 2002-08-13 12:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=594563&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
As
ÄúÒ»¶¨Ìý˵¹ýÏÄÐÂÒ»»úË«¿¨(Ò»¸öÊÖ»ú,Á½¸ö²»Í¬µÄÊÖ»úºÅÂë),ÕâÖÖÒ»»úË«¿¨Ôø¾·çÃÒÖйú,
ÒòΪÕâÖÖ¿¨ºÜ·½±ã,µ«ÊÇÓÉÓÚ¼Û¸ñ¹ý¸ß,ºÜ¶àÈËÖ»ÄÜÍû³¾Äª¼°,ÏÖÔÚÀ´ÖĄ́ÍåµÄÒ»»ú12¿¨
(Ò»¸öÊÖ»ú,Ê®¶þ¸ö²»Í¬µÄÊÖ»úºÅÂë),ÈúܶàÈËÔ¸ÍûµÃÒÔʵÏÖ¡£Ö»ÐèÒ»ÕÅССµÄÊÖ»ú¿¨,
ÔÙ²»ÓÃ×°¶à¸öÊÖ»úÁË¡£ÕâÕÅÊÖ»ú¿¨ÓÐͿд¹¦ÄÜ£¬¿ÉÒÔÌîд²»Í¬µÄºÅÂë½øÈ¥
Number of tests run: 976
Successful tests: 958
Errors:16
Failures: 2
[time of test: 1 October 2002 1:50 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems In
The JBoss-3.0.3 maintence release is available from SourceForge. Also
released are JBoss-3.0.3/Tomcat-4.0.5 and JBoss-3.0.3/Tomcat-4.1.12
bundles.
The files are available here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
The change notes are available here:
http://sourceforge.net
Yes. It appears to work, because the proxy seems to reference the same
object.
At least, it returns the same hashCode, and equals works.
Now I have to figure out why javax.ejb.EntityContext.getEJBObject has
started throwing "java.lang.IllegalStateException: No remote interface
defined.", but
This is in HEAD and 3.2. Both Local and XAConnectionManagers are wrappers
around TxConnectionManager. In XA and TxConnectionManager you can set
TrackConnectionByTx to eliminate all intermediate end(suspend) and
start(resume) calls. Also, all work on one tx will go through one
connection.
A sid
Hi Matt,
Answers in line.
>From: "Matt Munz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically
>Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:08:40 -0400
>
>Juha & group,
>
> It appears that there are two registries available
Hi,
I rememeber there was a discussion about keeping jdbc xa connection
allocated for a transaction until the transaction ends. Is it implemented?
--
Igor Fedorenko
Think smart. Think automated. Think Dynamics.
www.thinkdynamics.com
---
Th
You need to write your own registry implementation. The
JBossMBeanRegistry does
not automatically add classloaders that happen to be mbeans to the
loader
repository which the BasicMBeanRegistry does. I believe our
implementation of
the ModelMBean is the XMBean stuff.
S
Thanks for pointing out this problem. I applied your change and a couple
others that provide a more permanent solution to Branch_3_2 and HEAD.
Does your fix really work? I'd expect the proxy and actual instance not to
be equal since they have different classes...
Thanks again... I should have
Number of tests run: 939
Successful tests: 936
Errors:3
Failures: 0
[time of test: 30 September 2002 13:8 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.
ÕÐƸ¹«¸æ £¨±¾ÐÅÏ¢Ö»·¢Ò»´Î£¬ÎÞÒâÕßÇëɾ³ý£¬Ð»Ð»£©
±¾¹«Ë¾ÒòÒµÎñÐèÒª£¬¾ö¶¨ÔÚÈ«¹ú·¶Î§ÄÚÕÐƸ¸÷µØר¡¢¼æÖ°ÒµÎñÔ±¡£
ÕÐƸÓйØÊÂÒËÈçÏ£º
£¨1£© ÉêÇëÌõ¼þ£º
* ÈÈ°®µçÄÔ¼°ÍøÂçÊÂÒµ£¬ÊìϤINTERNET£¬ÒªÇó¿Ú´ÊÁ÷Àû£¬»á´ò×Ö£¬»áÉÏ»¥ÁªÍø£¬»áÔÚÍøÉÏ϶¨µ¥£¬»á°²×°¼òµ¥Èí¼þ£¬ÓÐÒ»¶¨µÄÒµÎñ¹µÍ¨ÄÜÁ¦¡£ÓÐÊг¡ÓªÏú¾ÑéÕßÓÅÏÈ£¬¡£
*
Sacha,
great work, please put this in documentation as I mentioned before.
documentation-getting-started.text and/or documentation-advanced.text
(or word).
Then we will collect these and make a compilation.
marc f
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Juha & group,
It appears that there are two registries available in
org.jboss.mx.server.registry. org.jboss.mx.server.ServerConstants seems to
indicate that org.jboss.mx.server.registry.BasicMBeanRegistry is the
registry that is actually used. Is this the registry that you refer to?
What does
Thanks!!
david jencks
On 2002.09.30 10:19:22 -0400 Adrian Brock wrote:
> Fixed in HEAD.
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
>
>
> >From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: jboss-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMX -- Problem with dynamic mbean w/null info
Bugs item #616546, was opened at 2002-09-30 06:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=616546&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to: Nobod
Hello,
I've just commited a generic cache-invalidation mechansim to HEAD (mainly in
org.jboss.cache.invalidation). Some of the code and ideas comes from Bill
Burke's implementation of the Seppuku algorithm that has been recently
commited.
It allows to have any cache to be invalidated by any reso
Fixed in HEAD.
Regards,
Adrian
>From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: jboss-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMX -- Problem with dynamic mbean w/null info.
>Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:37:02 -0400
>
>Hi,
>
>I'd appreciate it if one of the jmx expert
Bugs item #616546, was opened at 2002-09-30 15:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=616546&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to: Nobod
Bugs item #616546, was opened at 2002-09-30 13:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=616546&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to: Nob
So am I wrong about this problem? Do I simply have something misconfigured
with the container which is causing it to traverse down the wrong path for
remote queue name lookups?
Dustin
> -Original Message-
> From: Barlow, Dustin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26,
Bugs item #616546, was opened at 2002-09-30 15:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=616546&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
Bugs item #594563, was opened at 2002-08-13 05:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=594563&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
As
Hi David,
I'm currently working in Branch_3_2, trying to get our app running
under it, amongst other things.
We set up a number of different datasources, all pointing at various
Oracle databases, using the -service.xml style of configuration, and
also using security domains set up in login-co
24 matches
Mail list logo
