Bugs item #623562, was opened at 2002-10-15 10:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=623562&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTest
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Matthew Munz (mattmunz)
Assigned to: Nobod
Bugs item #624449, was opened at 2002-10-17 01:01
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=624449&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Archimedes Trajano (trajano)
Assign
Patches item #624402, was opened at 2002-10-16 20:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=624402&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dave Slotnick (slotnick2)
Ass
oops : ) i did it with default conf. : )
Scott M Stark wrote:
> You need to run the testsuite against the all configuration. Was that the case?
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
Emerson,
./run.sh -c all
David.
Your fix from 4.0 works in 3.0 with some small modifications,
but it broke the MBean context classloader.
Don't worry, I've fixed it in head.
I want to change registerMBean to automatically pick up the current
context classloader, just like it does when you fork
You need to run the testsuite against the all configuration. Was that the case?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Howdy all
Ive been messing with the JMS Selectors to implement the ability to do a
delivery time on a message for MDBs. Basically added in a
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP into the selector which gets translated into the
current time on parsing. (Its not in spec but i need some sort of delay
mechanism).
Pro
I tested 3.0.4RC2 from jboss 3.0 HEAD and i got the following results
(using "jboss-3.0/testsuite> ./build.sh tests")
tests FailuresErrors Success rateTime
917 1 41 95.42% 2341.579
is this correct or i missed something?
run-basic-testsuite target
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>Hiram,
>>
>>great news!
>>
>>Two things though,
>>
>>a) does this explain how to get servlet, jsp and ejb debugging
>>working with
>>jboss? Some of the other help files explain how to do this with
>>independent
>>versions of jboss and tomcat, but not for the integrated
JBoss clustering does load-balanching for ejb types.
EB's and SFSB's are "sticky" for performance reasons.
But all home invocations and SLSB invocations are round-robin by default.
IN JBoss 3.0.x CMP does not have a distributed cache. So you would need to
use commit 'B'.
Hire us, we'll help y
Easy.
How to sync Entities? Use Commit 'B' and if using CMP, or
select...for update for BMPs in ejbLoad. uses Select ...FOR
UPDATE on ejbLoad.
In CVS HEAD, Sacha and I have implemented a distributed cache via cache
invalidation, but we still rely on DB for the distributed lock. A real
Clust
The service missing a class test which is expected to fail in 3.0.
- Original Message -
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 16-October-2002
> H
other unrelated point :
We'll use web layer at the bank offices to avoid wasting band, so : is
there a way to use load-balance at the ejb layer???
because I think that modjk does it just for http request, am I right??
lsanders wrote:
> Some additional comments:
>
> 1) If a hardware load balanc
While we're on the subject -- I'm unable to reach the junit reports from
lubega.com. Does anyone have the right links for this?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PR
Hey scott, just what is this last failing test anyway?
david jencks
On 2002.10.16 16:05:11 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Number of tests run: 949
>
>
>
> Successful tests: 948
> Errors:1
> Failures: 0
>
> -
Number of tests run: 949
Successful tests: 948
Errors:1
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 October 2002 12:52 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Some additional comments:
1) If a hardware load balancer is out of the budget (Cisco local director series
start at about $4000 - not too expensive), then I would recommend looking at
"Linux Virtual Server" (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/). It is basically a
customized Linux kernel to do the
Hey, all.
I'm trying to build a JBoss 3.0.x / Tomcat 4.1.x bundle (for internal use at
my company) as an interim until JBoss 3.0.4 is officially released. When I
build a bundle with Tomcat 4.0.x, following the instructions in the readme
file in the catalina directory works fine. However, whe
Bill,
This is interesting about not using clustering.. Are you guys using CMP at all? If so,
how do you suggest synching the entity beans without using clustering? On a site
without CMP, you can usually get away from clustering, but wondering if you have used
the equiv of Javelin to do distrib
- You'll probably want to buy some Hardware based HTTP load-balancer for
your web traffic. Make sure it supports "sticky" sessions. You can try
Apache + modjk + AJP13 if you want a cheap software solution. Jetty and
Tomcat can be hooked in.
- Do you require HTTP Session replication and failove
Today i got a question from my manager (i work in a bank, there will be
a web layer at the bank office and a central ejb layer) :
"Emerson, how many boxes in the ejblayer do we need to support 800
offices and more than 4000 simultaneous clients (from the offices).
Imagine that you have available
21 matches
Mail list logo
