Bugs item #652520, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652520&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 9
Submitted By: Artemiy Zinoviev (bedriven)
Assigne
Bugs item #652520, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652520&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Artemiy Zinoviev (bedriven)
Assigned
I used
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss login
cvs -z9 -dP -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss/
update jboss-head
Is it something wrong?
tnx,
Calin
- Original Message -
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12,
Bill,
> 1. What have you worked on in the past?
Management. XMBean Persistence.
> 2. What are you currently working on?
I'm not actively working on JBoss code at the moment.
> 3. What will you be working on and when?
At some point, I plan on returning to the XMBean Persist
Bugs item #649143, was opened at 2002-12-05 20:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=649143&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Colin Sampaleanu (colins)
Assigned to: Nob
Hi all!
Its time to gear up and embark on the journey that is JBoss 4.0. Our
schedule is ambitious. We want to get a release done by JavaOne(the next
JBossOne) in June 2003 so its gonna take a lot of hard work and focus from
us over the next 6 months. That being said, I need some information fr
What did you use to check out? That stuff has been there a week or two and
checks out and compiles fine for me.
david jencks
On 2002.12.11 17:18:10 -0500 Calin Lupa Crisan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the head compiling?
>
> I check it out and get the following errors:
>
>
> C:\jboss_head\jboss-head\s
Bugs item #652411, was opened at 2002-12-12 00:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652411&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Bugs item #652411, was opened at 2002-12-12 00:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=652411&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (n
btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a
whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or similar
ieee implementations.
few catchwords:
Utility Communications Architecture (UCA)
Generic Object Models for Substation and Feeder Equipment (GOMSFE)
==>
i understand 'it would be great, but we shouldn't do it.'
bax
> Von: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:09:46 -0600
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME
>
> Once again Peter I have no idea what you mean.
>
> -d
Hi,
Is the head compiling?
I check it out and get the following errors:
C:\jboss_head\jboss-head\server\src\main\org\jboss\invocation\trunk\client\C
lien
tSetup.java:16: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class Client
location: package client
import org.jboss.system.client.Client;
Once again Peter I have no idea what you mean.
-dain
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 03:42 PM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
Yes - a separated JBossClient project would be clean in diff'ing the
different built's for target'ed device VM's.
JBoss Serving up J2ME is natural without any further coup
Yes - a separated JBossClient project would be clean in diff'ing the
different built's for target'ed device VM's.
JBoss Serving up J2ME is natural without any further coupling ... Then
- *WoW* - when adding jboss-client into the mix - gives - having an
object inside the client *mirroring* the J
Does the jboss.net testsuite currently build and run? Looks to me like
the build.xml is a generation behind, since it isn't using the new
buildmagic stuff in JBOSS_HOME/tools/lib/etc
Anyone have an updated version?
Thanks,
fawce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1001
Successful tests: 991
Errors:8
Failures: 2
[time of test: 2002-12-11.12-17 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
because of the 'hard' nature of the hardware [hardware is alive - and
hardware is mad!] i have to contribute the following:
- systronix JStick (ajile aj-100) + development board
- dallas tini; and if they are available tini400
- ez80 development system
all these devices are able to be online - ev
That is way smaller then I personally would use, but it is a good
target. I would like to have a few distros available, headless-small,
cellphone, and handheld.
-dain
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 01:56 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
Are any of you guys interested in working on a JBossME proj
> Are any of you guys interested in working on a JBossME project?
just working in this direction - need a secure device for a mobile pki ca/ra
with some java ibuttons. my constraints are:
- no os, no fs
- only jboss 4.0 - weboss kernel
- ca. 100mhz clk
- 1..16mbyte
- headless
- jca arch for drivi
Márcio Emílio Cruz Vono de Azevedo wrote:
Yes, you found the solution indeed!!!
I've tried it and it solved my problem!!!
Thank you very much!
--
Márcio Emílio Cruz Vono de Azevedo
System Specialist
Inatel Competence Center
http://www.inatel.br
The solution is not actually correct in case you
or you could just skip the whole pain in the ass I just described and
use that jar :-)
-jason
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 11:57 AM, John Fawcett wrote:
Pardon my stupidity.
The appropriate jar built in the jboss.net module and after a build is
located at:
/jboss-head/jboss.net/output/
You bet I am !!!
shhh... don't tell my boss :)
/Lennart
- Original Message -
From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss on j2me?
>
> Are any of you guys interested in working on
hi fawce
the files you are looking for are:
JBOSS_HOME/jboss.net/src/resources/xdoclet/modules/jboss/net/resources/jboss-net_xml.xdt
JBOSS_HOME/jboss.net/src/tools/xdoclet/modules/jboss/net/JBossNetSubTask.java
to create a version of xDoclet that has this subtask
get a current copy of the xDoc
Pardon my stupidity.
The appropriate jar built in the jboss.net module and after a build is
located at:
/jboss-head/jboss.net/output/lib/xdoclet-module-jboss-net.jar
Sorry for the remedial posts.
Later,
fawce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_01"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
Hi,
This has been discussed before, but does anyone know that
status/location of the ant task? I can't seem to find it in
jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet-xdoclet/lib
Thanks,
fawce
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Stefan Groschupf wrote:
Hi Dain,
My goal is to target the high end handhelds, but thoes are getting so
powerful (400 MHz 256MB)
that I don't know if we need a 'micro' vm.
Thank you for taking the stress and test it. ;-)
You are every time some st
When the binary comes out later this week (or next) I would like to
have a build for it.
-dain
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 10:13 AM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
my work is more targeted to the small 1..16mbyte devices, like ajile,
ds80400 and ez80. should be possible to port the cvm to this o
Hi Dain,
>My goal is to target the high end handhelds, but thoes are getting so
powerful (400 MHz 256MB)
>that I don't know if we need a 'micro' vm.
Thank you for taking the stress and test it. ;-)
You are every time some steps before the "main stream".
What you had tried exactly? I'm interested t
Bugs item #648344, was opened at 2002-12-04 06:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=648344&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Barrow (bruce_b)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
my work is more targeted to the small 1..16mbyte devices, like ajile,
ds80400 and ez80. should be possible to port the cvm to this ones.
bax
> Von: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:33:20 -0600
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re:
i found at:
http://www.oetrends.com/cgi-bin/page_display.cgi?62
one statement:
OET: Do you have any plans yet for a JBoss 4.0? If so, what are they?
Fleury: It's time for us to push the standard [for embedded devices].
What I mean by that is that we can take EJB, embed it in JMX and really
foc
OK. Good luck.
Cheers,
sacha
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> Jeremy Boynes
> Envoyé : mercredi, 11 décembre 2002 16:56
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to clean
> up netboo
Feature Requests item #652101, was opened at 2002-12-11 16:03
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=652101&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTest
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to
Sacha Labourey wrote:
>
> You should check this as well:
> http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/FAQ.html It is not so big and
> implements tons of http stuff (I will most probably use that for HTTP
> Session clustering automated test suite).
Thanks, I will
>
> BTW, what is the "size" of all
Bugs item #648344, was opened at 2002-12-04 11:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=648344&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Barrow (bruce_b)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
It already runs on the Sun CVM. I have personly tried it.
-dain
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 09:41 AM, Stefan Groschupf wrote:
Hi guys,
Christoph Ebro told me in the jmx forum mailing list that sun has a
CLDC
j2me prototype of jmx.
Would that be interesting for other here to port the j
Hi guys,
Christoph Ebro told me in the jmx forum mailing list that sun has a CLDC
j2me prototype of jmx.
Would that be interesting for other here to port the jboss jmx to j2me? I
cant do this, since I'm to poor in knowledge about that. But I see the need
since then jboss can run on mobile and embe
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 06:24 AM, Stefan Groschupf wrote:
Hope it will... cause i will use it like that in a project :)
So we can try it together.. ;-)
May be some more people will take the same trip.
I have. I got the JBoss MBean kernel to boot with the Sun CVM, but I
couldn't
Thanks for fixing the duplicate mbeanserver error, obviously I didnt test
for it:-)
I'm finding few (ie. about the same as 3.2) errors when I start jboss and
run the testsuite by itself, so I think the problems I was having are in
the ant script code that runs everything at once rather than in jb
>Hope it will... cause i will use it like that in a project :)
So we can try it together.. ;-)
May be some more people will take the same trip.
cheers
Stefan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibili
Yes, you found the solution indeed!!!
I've tried it and it solved my problem!!!
Thank you very much!
--
Márcio Emílio Cruz Vono de Azevedo
System Specialist
Inatel Competence Center
http://www.inatel.br
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Em nome de Barlow
Hope it will... cause i will use it like that in a project :)
/L
onsdagen den 11 december 2002 kl 12.03 skrev Stefan Groschupf:
Hi,
some crazy guy had tried to run the jboss micro kernel on a j2me
device?
Should that be possible?
Thanks
Stefan
--
Title: bearshare
Hi,
some crazy guy had tried to run the jboss micro kernel on a j2me device?
Should that be possible?
Thanks
Stefan
Title: bearshare
Hello,
I already saw that when writing the first extension, which is why I ended up
using the GET mechanism to quickly have something working. If you want to
make a second extension, I suggest it to be a real WebDAV one ;)
You should check this as well:
http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/FA
46 matches
Mail list logo
