[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652520 ] INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652520, was opened at 2002-12-12 08:04 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652520group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Artemiy Zinoviev (bedriven) Assigned

Re: [JBoss-dev] ATTENTION! Developers with CVS access

2002-12-12 Thread julien viet
hi Bill, - I have done bug fixes a --- Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hi all! Its time to gear up and embark on the journey that is JBoss 4.0. Our schedule is ambitious. We want to get a release done by JavaOne(the next JBossOne) in June 2003 so its gonna take a lot of hard

AW: [JBoss-dev] jbossnet ant task

2002-12-12 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Not yet. I tweaked it ~3 weeks ago to somehow run through, but there may have been changes such that I should change it. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: John Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 22:21 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652576 ] Testsuite build.xml is not up-to-date

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652576, was opened at 2002-12-12 11:13 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652576group_id=22866 Category: JBossSOAP Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung) Assigned

Re: [JBoss-dev] ATTENTION! Developers with CVS access

2002-12-12 Thread Michael Bartmann
Hi Bill, 1. What have you worked on in the past? XSL driven deployment of JMS Providers, XSL driven deployment of NoTx-datasources CronScheduler, ApplicationDeadlockRetryInterceptor various reliability aspects (deadlocks, interceptors, memory leaks, thread leaks) 2. What are you currently

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652628 ] Typo in ejb verify error message

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652628, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652628group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] compiling head SOLVED

2002-12-12 Thread Calin Lupa Crisan
Solved, a fresh checkout is compiling, sorry to bother. I thought that cvs update -dP jboss-head should work also but it didn't... Calin - Original Message - From: Calin Lupa Crisan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:42 AM Subject: Re:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652628 ] Typo in ejb verify error message

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652628, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652628group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652628 ] Typo in ejb verify error message

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652628, was opened at 2002-12-12 13:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652628group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann: btw: who is talking about jboss-client? All I am saying is that there will be many different devices with different VM's out there soon ... and for us to have a compatible jboss-client build for each and every one of them is a

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Holger Baxmann
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann: btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or similar ieee implementations. Utility Communications Architecture (UCA) Generic Object

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652717 ] JB 3.0.4 / Cat 4.1.12: Coyote-Config ign

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652717, was opened at 2002-12-12 16:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652717group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Halil-C. Gürsoy (che---)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652717 ] JB 3.0.4 / Cat 4.1.12: Coyote-Config ignored

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652717, was opened at 2002-12-12 16:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652717group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Halil-C. Gürsoy (che---)

RE: [JBoss-dev] ATTENTION! Developers with CVS access

2002-12-12 Thread MNewcomb
-Original Message- From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 1. What have you worked on in the past? Various bug fixes: worked with Dain on some of the read-ahead performance issues; worked with David to get the EAR deploying *-ds.xml and *-service.xml files; etc... 2. What are

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-652743 ] Jmx-console is requesting bg.gif

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #652743, was opened at 2002-12-12 17:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=652743group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds. If anyone wants to make the other ones, that would be cool. -dain On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 08:53 AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote: torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann: btw: who is talking about

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-629145 ] ejb-link bug

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #629145, was opened at 2002-10-26 19:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=629145group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Wachter (stefanwachter) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-650929 ] ejb-link doesn't work in deployment

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #650929, was opened at 2002-12-09 16:54 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=650929group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Strachan (strachancambs)

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom: I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds. oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of - Phones - PDA's - SBC (Single Board Computers) If anyone wants to make the other ones, that would be cool. yes it

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Holger Baxmann
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 16.01 skrev Holger Baxmann: embedded systems constits normally of many - some 1...k - devices, clustering comes to my mind ... Yes - but lets try break embedded down some, to devise's that use a Mobile Phone Wire and device's using a SBC

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Holger Baxmann
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom: I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds. oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of - Phones - PDA's - SBC (Single Board Computers) i do not know the structure of this bullet list is, what the

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote: btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc) which is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael block cipher. is this powerfull? I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Peter Fagerlund
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann: according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend. what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any halfway intelligent

[JBoss-dev] helloejb web service error

2002-12-12 Thread John Fawcett
Hi, I've been having trouble deploying one of my EJBs as a web service on jboss-head, so I went back and tried the example from: http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~bscharla/teaching/mtp_software/jboss/jboss-ne t-EJB-example.shtml I get the same error for both my ejb/webservice and the hello example

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Holger Baxmann
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote: btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc) which is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael block cipher. is this powerfull? I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Holger Baxmann
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann: according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend. what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any halfway intelligent

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Holger Baxmann
JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ? emboss was being mentioned by marc back in april. but it is an dna sequencing software name too. The project should look into investing in DASH-O Pro to compress the binary

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-554535 ] Oracle BLOB and byte array

2002-12-12 Thread noreply
Bugs item #554535, was opened at 2002-05-10 04:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554535group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Niall O'Sullivan (nosullivan)

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 12-December-2002

2002-12-12 Thread scott . stark
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1001 Successful tests: 992 Errors:8 Failures: 1 [time of test: 2002-12-12.12-07 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1]

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 01:33 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote: I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with enough power to run the current version of WindowCE (handheld version). What I mean are the IPaq and Zauras, both of which are currently 200 MHz 64 Meg on the low end currently and

Re: [JBoss-dev] ATTENTION! Developers with CVS access

2002-12-12 Thread Aaron Lindsey
Hey Bill, 1. What have you worked on in the past? JMS bug fixes 2. What are you currently working on? 3. What will you be working on and when? Nothing at the moment. We're doing a lot with JMS at my company, so I've been fixing bugs as I find them. 4. What do you want to work on? I

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME

2002-12-12 Thread Holger Baxmann
it is late in the night 2:50am, but i have the idea: why not embedded jboss? -- ejboss -- ok, going fishing some sleep... bax JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ? The project should look into investing in DASH-O

[JBoss-dev] NEED YOUR HELP!

2002-12-12 Thread Bill Burke
Hi all! JBoss has become a huge success and has reached the milestone of over 2 million downloads. Unfortunately though, because we're open-source and free, we rarely get any testamonials on JBoss success stories. Please help us spread the word! Enter your testamonial at the forum below.

[JBoss-dev] NEED JBOSS SUCCESS STORIES!

2002-12-12 Thread Bill Burke
Hi all! JBoss has become a huge success and has reached the milestone of over 2 million downloads. Unfortunately though, because we're open-source and free, we rarely get any testamonials on JBoss success stories. Please help us spread the word! Enter your testamonial at the forum below.